Skip to main content
Log in

An interlaboratory comparison on whole water samples

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC requires monitoring of organic priority pollutants in so-called whole water samples, i.e. in aqueous non-filtered samples that contain natural colloidal and suspended particulate matter. Colloids and suspended particles in the liquid phase constitute a challenge for sample homogeneity and stability. Within the joint research project ENV08 “Traceable measurements for monitoring critical pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC”, whole water test materials were developed by spiking defined amounts of aqueous slurries of ultra-finely milled contaminated soil or sediment and aqueous solutions of humic acid into a natural mineral water matrix. This paper presents the results of an European-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) using this type of test materials. Target analytes were tributyltin, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ng/L concentration range. Results of the ILC indicate that the produced materials are sufficiently homogeneous and stable to serve as samples for, e.g. proficiency testing or method validation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that ready-to-use water materials with a defined amount of suspended particulate and colloidal matter have been applied as test samples in an interlaboratory exercise. These samples meet the requirements of the European Water Framework Directive. Previous proficiency testing schemes mainly employed filtered water samples fortified with a spike of the target analyte in a water-miscible organic solvent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L 327:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. Off J Eur Union L 348:84–97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lepom P, Hanke G, Wollgast J, Loos R, Duffek A (2009) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Guidance Document, n. 19—guidance on surface water chemical monitoring under the water framework directive. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lepom P, Brown B, Hanke G, Loos R, Quevauviller P, Wollgast J (2009) Needs for reliable analytical methods for monitoring chemical pollutants in surface water under the European water framework directive. J Chromatogr A 1216:302–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ademollo N, Patrolecco L, Polesello S, Valsecchi S, Wollgast J, Mariani G, Hanke G (2012) The analytical problem of measuring total concentrations of organic pollutants in whole water. Trends Anal Chem 36:71–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/90/EC of 31 July 2009 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status. Off J Eur Union L 201:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumeister F, Borchers U, Koch M (2010) PT-WFD: the network of PT providers to support the implementation of the European water framework directive. Accred Qual Assur 15:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. About IMEP—JRC science hub. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/interlaboratory-comparisons/IMEP/about. Assessed 21 Dec 2015

  9. Noergaard J, Van Nevel L, Aregbe Y, Papadakis I, Taylor P (2001) IMEP: bringing SI-traceable values to field laboratories. VAM Bull 24:26–27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brunori C, Morabito R, Ipolyi I, Pellegrino C, Ricci M, Bercaru O, Ulberth F, Sahuquillo A, Rosenberg E (2007) The SWIFT-WFD proficiency testing campaigns in support of implementing the EU water framework directive. Trends Anal Chem 26:993–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van de Kreeke J, de la Calle B, Held A, Bercaru O, Ricci M, Shegunova P, Taylor P (2010) IMEP-23: the eight EU-WFD priority PAHs in water in the presence of humic acid. Trends Anal Chem 29:928–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bercaru O, Ricci M, Ulberth F, Brunori C, Morabito R, Ipolyi I, Sahuquillo A, Rosenberg E (2009) Challenges in preparing water-matrix reference materials for PAHs and pesticides: examples from SWIFT-WFD proficiency-testing schemes. Trends Anal Chem 28:1074–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. European Metrology Research Programme Homepage. http://www.emrponline.eu/. Assessed 21 Dec 2015

  14. Elordui-Zapatarietxe S, Fettig I, Philipp R, Gantois F, Lalere B, Swart C, Petrov P, Goenaga-Infante H, Vanermen G, Boom G, Emteborg H (2015) Novel concepts for preparation of reference materials as whole water samples for priority substances at ng L−1 level using model suspended particulate matter and humic acids. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:3055–3067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ran Y, Fu JM, Sheng GY, Beckett R, Hart BT (2000) Fractionation and composition of colloidal and suspended particulate materials in rivers. Chemosphere 41:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elordui-Zapatarietxe S, Fettig I, Richter J, Philipp R, Vanermen G, Monteyne E, Boom G, Emteborg H (2016) Preparation and evaluation of sufficiently homogeneous and stable reference materials for priority hazardous substances in whole water. Accred Qual Assur. doi:10.1007/s00769-015-1189-1

  17. Elordui-Zapatarietxe S, Fettig I, Richter J, Philipp R, Gantois F, Swart C, Emteborg H (2015) Interaction of 15 priority substances for water monitoring at ng L−1 levels with glass-, aluminium- and fluorinated polyethylene bottles for the containment of water reference materials. Accred Qual Assur 20:447–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. ISO 5725–5:2002 (2002) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 5: Alternative methods for the determination of the precision of a standard measurement method (ISO 5725-5:1998). ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  19. PROLab Software for interlaboratory studies. https://quodata.de/en/software/for-interlaboratory-tests/software-for-interlaboratory-studies-prolab.html. Assessed 21 Dec 2015

  20. Hoch M, Schwesig D (2004) Parameters controlling the partitioning of tributyl tin (TBT) in aquatic systems. Appl Geochem 19:323–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ENV08 project was funded by the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP). The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET, the European Association of National Metrology Institutes and the European Union. The authors would like to thank Andreas Buchholz (BAM) for the statistical analysis of the ILC data and Carine Fallot (LNE), Anaïs Rincel (LNE), Pablo Rodriguez-Gonzalez (University of Oviedo), J. Ignacio Garcia Alonso (University of Oviedo) and Pirjo Sainio (SYKE) for ILC measurements and helpful discussions. The participation of the following laboratories in the ILC is gratefully acknowledged: Administratia Nationala Apele Romane, National Laboratory (LN-AITM), Bucharest, Romania; Administration de la gestion de l’eau, Division du Laboratoire, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxemburg; Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambiente Ligure, Dipartimento della Spezia, U.O. Laboratorio, La Spezia, Italy; APPA Trento, Settore Laboratori, Trento, Italy; ARPAM, Ascoli Piceno, Italy; ARPAM, Dipartimento Provinciale di Ancona, Ancona, Italy; CNR-IRSA Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, Brugherio, Italy; Ramboll Analytics, Lahti, Finland; Regional Environmental Agency of Marche (ARPAM), Macerata Department, Macerata, Italy; RWS Laboratory, Lelystad, The Netherlands; Serbian Agency for Environmental Protection, Beograd, Serbia; and Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, Afdeling Rapportering Water, Sint-Denijs-Westrem, Belgium. Acknowledgements are due to Hanne Leys who coordinated the shipments from IRMM. Irma Huybrechts and Diana Vernelen (also at IRMM) who cleaned all bottles and helped during packing and shipping of the samples are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are finally due to Gerard Boom (TNO, Utrecht, NL), Guido Vanermen (VITO, Mol, BE) and the partners in the ENV08 consortium (BAM, LNE and PTB) who provided important information on homogeneity and stability on the testing parameters before preparation of the ILC samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemarie Philipp.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 548 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richter, J., Elordui-Zapatarietxe, S., Emteborg, H. et al. An interlaboratory comparison on whole water samples. Accred Qual Assur 21, 121–129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1190-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1190-8

Keywords

Navigation