Abstract
In order to verify that the protocols used for water quality monitoring of surface waters within the Long-term Environmental Research Monitoring and Testing System (OPE), located in the north-eastern part of France in relation with a geological disposal for radioactive waste project, are fit for purpose, a validation study was conducted following the methodology described in the Eurachem/citac and Nordtest guidance documents on uncertainty arising from sampling. As one of the objectives of the OPE water monitoring programme was to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of water quality, quality requirements were set to having a measurement variance, including sampling and analytical contributions, less than 20 % of the total variance to minimise the impact of measurement over the observed environmental variability. The replicate method was then selected in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty, including the sampling contribution, as well as the spatial and temporal variability of water quality of surface waters. To minimise costs, a single-split level was selected. Analytical uncertainties were assessed from inter-laboratory data and/or internal quality control data from the last 2–5 years. Finally, ANOVA was applied to the data sets after elimination of outliers. Results showed that for pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity and nitrate, the sampling uncertainty was negligible, whereas for other parameters such as dissolved oxygen, total suspend solids, total organic carbon, nitrite and phosphate, the sampling contribution to the measurement uncertainty was largely significant. For all parameters except calcium, the sampling and analytical protocols were considered fit for purpose.
References
Harmancioglu NB, Fistikiglu O, Ozkul SD, Singh VP, Alpaslan MN (1999) Water quality monitoring network design. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Sanders TG, Ward RC, Loftis JC, Steele TD, Adrian DD, Yevjevich V (1983) Design of networks for monitoring water quality. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado
Strobl RO, Robillard PD (2008) Network design for water quality monitoring of surface freshwaters: a review. J Environ Manage 87:639–648
Steele TD (1987) Water quality monitoring strategies. Hydrol Sci J 32:207–213
Analytical Methods Committee (2005) Analytical and sampling strategy, fitness for purpose, and computer games. AMC Technical Briefs 16A, The Royal Society of Chemistry, London
Ramsey MH, Thompson M (2007) Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur 12:503–513
Lyn JA, Palestra IM, Ramsey MH, Damant PA, Word R (2007) Modifying uncertainty from sampling to achieve fitness for purpose: a case study on nitrate in lettuce. Accred Qual Assur 12:67–74
Garrett RG (1969) The determination of sampling and analytical errors in exploration geochemistry. Econ Geol 64:568–569
Thompson M, Ramsey MH (1995) Quality concepts and practices applied to sampling: an exploratory study. Analyst 120:261–270
EURACHEM/CITAC, Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling. First Edition (2007) Editors: Ramsey MH (University of Sussex, UK) and Ellison SLR (LGC, UK)
Grøn C, Bjerre Hansen J, Magnusson B, Nordbotten A, Krysell M, Jebjerg Andersen K, Lund U(2007) Uncertainty from sampling—a nordtest handbook for sampling planners on sampling quality assurance and uncertainty estimation. Nordtest TR-604
Ramsey MH, Thompson M, Hale M (1992) Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance. J Geochem Explor 44:23–36
Gy PM (1998) Sampling for analytical purposes. Wiley, Chichester
De Zorzi P, Belli M, Barbizzi S, Menegon S, Deluisa A (2002) A practical approach to assessment of sampling uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 7:182–188
Kurfurst U, Desaules A, Rehnert A, Muntau H (2004) Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use. Accred Qual Assur 9:64–75
Minkkinen P (2004) Practical applications of sampling theory. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 74:85–94
Ramsey MH (1998) Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources. J Anal Atom Spectrom 13:97–104
Ramsey MH (1993) Sampling and analytical quality control, using robust analysis of variance. Appl Geochem 2:149–153
Analytical Methods Committee (2009) The duplicate method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty arising from sampling. AMC technical briefs 40. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London
Boon K, Ramsey MH (2010) Uncertainty of measurement or of mean value for the reliable classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 409:423–429
Bodnar M, Namiesnik J, Konieczka P (2013) Validation of a sampling procedure. Trends Anal Chem 51:117–126
Ramsey MH, Argyraki A, Thompson M (1995) Estimation of sampling bias between different protocols on contaminated land. Analyst 120:1353–1356
Ramsey MH, Argyriaki A (1997) Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 198:243–257
Ramsey MH, Argyraki A, Thompson M (1995) On the collaborative trial in sampling. Analyst 120:2309–2317
Kurfurst U, Buczko U, Kleimeier C, Kuchenbuch RO (2011) Soil sampling uncertainty on arable fields estimated from reference sampling and a collaborative trial. Accred Qual Assur 16:73–81
Squire S, Ramsey MH (2001) Inter-organisational sampling trials for the uncertainty estimation of landfill gas measurements. J Environ Monit 3:288–294
Gluschke M (2008) Collaborative sampling trial in the context of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring program for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Accred Qual Assur 13:101–107
Strub MP, Lepot B, Morin A (2009) Metrological aspects of collaborative field trials, including coping with unexpected events. Trends Anal Chem 28:245–261
Botta F, Lepot B, Leoz-Garziandia E, Morin A (2012) Estimation of sampling uncertainty in lake-water monitoring in a collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 36:176–184
Cotman M, Pintar A (2013) Sampling uncertainty of wastewater monitoring estimated in a collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 51:71–78
Argyraky A, Ramsey MH, Thompson M (1995) Proficiency testing in sampling: pilot study on contaminated land. Analyst 120:2799–2804
Guigues N, Desenfant M, Hance E (2013) Combining multivariate statistics and analysis of variance to redesign a water quality monitoring network. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:1692–1705
JCGM 200 (2012) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms, 3rd edn. http://www.bipm.org/vim
JCGM 100 (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html
EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Third Edition (2012). Editors: Ellison SLR (LGC, UK) and Williams A (UK)
Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M (2004) Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, edn 2. Nordtest TR-537
ISO 11352 (2013) Water quality—estimation of measurement uncertainty based on validation and quality control data. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
Guigues N, Desenfant M (2010) Définition et Expertise du réseau d’observation des eaux et des sédiments de la zone l’Observatoire Pérenne de l’Environnement. Partie I: Validation du plan d’échantillonnage du nouveau réseau d’observation. Rapport LNE: 70p (available from LNE on request—in French)
ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
ISO 5667-1 (2007) Water quality—sampling—part 1: guidance on the design of sampling programmes and sampling techniques. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
FD T90-523-1 (2008) Qualité de l’eau—guide de prélèvement pour le suivi de la qualité des eaux dans l’environnement. Partie 1: Prélèvement d’eau superficielle. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), Paris
ISO 5667-3 (2013) Water quality—sampling—part 3: preservation and handling of water samples. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
Ghestem JP, Fisicaro P, Champion R (2009) Essai collaborative sur l’échantillonnage en eau souterraine. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr
Blanquet JP, Chatellier N, Strub MP, Lepot B (2007) Impact des opérations de prélèvements sur la variabilité des résultats d’analyse. Ineris DRC-07-86076-16167B. www.ineris.fr
Blanquet JP, Botta F, Champion R, Ferret C, Guigues N, Lazzarotto J, Lepot B (2011) Impact des operations sur la variabilité des résultats d’analyses—Essai inter comparaison sur le prélèvement en plan d’eau 2010. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr
Lepot B, Ferret C, Blanquet JP (2013) Essai collaboratif d’intercomparaison sur le prélèvement en rejet canalisé pour la mesure des micropolluants. Aquaref. www.aquaref.fr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guigues, N., Desenfant, M., Lalere, B. et al. Estimating sampling and analysis uncertainties to assess the fitness for purpose of a water quality monitoring network. Accred Qual Assur 21, 101–112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1186-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1186-4