Skip to main content
Log in

PT as a tool to point out criticalities in the strategy for control of antibiotic residues in milk: the Italian experience

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Screening represents the first step for antibiotic residues control; thus, screening methods play a key role in the entire control procedure. The Italian National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for veterinary antimicrobial residues in food from animal origin organized the first proficiency test (PT) for the screening of antibiotic residues in milk to assess the competence of the official control laboratories. The 38 participants received two series (respectively, at 1.8 % and 3.5 % of fat mass fraction) of eight blind lyophilized milk samples, spiked with cloxacillin (CLX), benzylpenicillin (PEN), sulfadiazine (SDZ) and oxytetracycline (OXY) at once and twice the respective maximum residue limit. In addition, an unspiked sample (blank) was also included in each series. Since the vast majority of false-negative results was associated with OXY, leading to low sensitivity and accuracy, laboratories performances were evaluated separately for OXY (sensitivity 16.44 %, false-negative rate 62.25 % and accuracy 44.54 %) and, respectively, for CLX, PEN and SDZ assessed together (sensitivity 99.56 %, false-negative rate 2.53 % and accuracy 99.63 %); the false-positive rate resulted equivalent to 0 % and the specificity to 100 %. The criticality identified by the PT was that OXY was not detectable under the routine screening analysis conditions adopted because of the use of only two screening methods (Delvotest SP-NT and CMT) both unfit for its detection at mass fractions of interest. As a consequence, the NRL provided guidance to participants to implement different and complementary screening methods. The effectiveness of the corrective actions undertaken by participants will be evaluated with the next PT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. EU Council (1990) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off J L 224:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. EU Commission (2002) Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J L 221:8–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules

  4. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decision 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC

  5. European Medicines Agency (2013) Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 25 EU/EEA countries in 2011: Third ESVAC report (Eur Med Agency, London). www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_listing/document_listing_000302.jsp

  6. International Organization for Standardization (2008) Quality management systems: requirements. ISO 9001:2008. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (2003) Microbiology of foods and animal feeding stuffs-protocol for the validation of alternative methods. ISO 16140:2003. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reybroeck W, Ooghe S, Grijspeerdt K (2004) First results of the validation of the Copan Milk Test for the detection of residues of antibiotics and sulphonamides in milk. UBISI 2004, IDF/FAO/OIE International Symposium on Dairy Safety and Hygiene. A Farm-to-table Approach for Emerging and Developed Dairy Countries, Cape Town, South-Africa

  9. Le Breton MH, Savoy-Perroud MC, Diserens JM (2007) Validation and comparison of the Copan Milk Test and Delvotest SP-NT for the detection of antimicrobials in milk. Anal Chim Acta 586:280–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stead SL, Ashwin H, Richmond SF, Sharman M, Langeveld PC, Barendse JP, Stark J, Keely BJ (2008) Evaluation and validation according to international standards of the Delvotest SP-NT screening assay for antimicrobial drugs in milk. Int Dairy J 18:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Ferrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrini, A.M., Agrimi, U., Appicciafuoco, B. et al. PT as a tool to point out criticalities in the strategy for control of antibiotic residues in milk: the Italian experience. Accred Qual Assur 20, 267–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1127-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1127-2

Keywords

Navigation