Abstract
Evaluation of laboratory test results in a proficiency test should preferably be done against a predetermined standard deviation. This standard deviation may be derived from the reproducibility of a standardized test method. However, in practice, the respective test method may lack precision data. The often used alternative, the use of a characteristic function, of which the Horwitz function is the most well known, is only applicable for chemical parameters where the concentration of an analyte is measured. For physical parameters, like viscosity, the concentration-dependent functions cannot be used. In this article, an example is presented on the estimation of the reproducibility (reproducibility limit R) and the measurement uncertainty of a viscosity test method from historical proficiency test data.
References
ISO 5725, parts 1–6:1994–2002, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results, ISO, Geneva
ISO 4259:2006—Petroleum products—determination and application of precision data in relation to methods of test, ISO, Geneva
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, ISO, Geneva
NEN 7779 (2008), Environment—measurement uncertainty, NEN, Delft, Netherlands
AMC technical brief (2003) No. 15, Is my uncertainty estimate realistic? Royal Society of Chemistry. http://www.rsc.org
Analytical Method Committee (2010) Accred Qual Assur 15:73–79
LaBudde RA (2012) Statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies XXXV, reproducibility estimates from proficiency test data, TR322, least cost formulations, Virginia Beach, USA
Koch M, Magnusson B (2012) Accred Qual Assur 17:399–403
Côté I, Robouch P, Robouch B, Bisson D, Gamache P, LeBlanc A, Dumas P, Perdneault M (2012) Accred Qual Assur 17:389–393
Stefanelli P, Generali T, Barbini DA, Girolimetti S (2013) J Environ Sci Health Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 48(7):523–529
Visser RG (2009) Accred Qual Assur 14:29–34
Jarvis B, Corry JEL, Hedges AJ (2007) J Appl Microbiol 103(2):462–467
Young WC, Roberton RS (eds) (1989) Turbine oil monitoring. ASTM International, STP1021
Rand SJ (2003) Significance of tests for petroleum products, STP7, 7th edition. ASTM International
Totten GE (ed) (2003) Fuels and lubricants, handbook: technology, properties, performance and testing. ASTM Manual Series: MNL 37 WCD. ASTM International
ASTM D445-2014e1, Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids. ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19428-2959, United States
ISO 3104:1994/Cor 1:1997, Petroleum products—transparent and opaque liquids—determination of kinematic viscosity and calculation of dynamic viscosity. ISO, Geneva
ASTM D2162-2014, Standard practice for basic calibration of master viscometers and viscosity oil standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19428-2959, United States
Visser RG (2006) Accred Qual Assur 10:521–526
Thompson M, Ellison SLR (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:373–378
Horwitz W, Kamps LR, Boyer KW (1980) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:1344
Thompson M, Wood R (2006) Accred Qual Assur 10:471. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0040-5
PT-data. http://www.iisnl.com. Section ‘news and reports’
Rosner B (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25(2):165–172
ISO 21748:2010—Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. ISO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, R.G., Nijssen-Wester, C. Estimation of reproducibility and measurement uncertainty of a viscosity test method from proficiency test data. Accred Qual Assur 20, 125–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1110-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1110-y