Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of reproducibility and measurement uncertainty of a viscosity test method from proficiency test data

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of laboratory test results in a proficiency test should preferably be done against a predetermined standard deviation. This standard deviation may be derived from the reproducibility of a standardized test method. However, in practice, the respective test method may lack precision data. The often used alternative, the use of a characteristic function, of which the Horwitz function is the most well known, is only applicable for chemical parameters where the concentration of an analyte is measured. For physical parameters, like viscosity, the concentration-dependent functions cannot be used. In this article, an example is presented on the estimation of the reproducibility (reproducibility limit R) and the measurement uncertainty of a viscosity test method from historical proficiency test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. ISO 5725, parts 1–6:1994–2002, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results, ISO, Geneva

  2. ISO 4259:2006—Petroleum products—determination and application of precision data in relation to methods of test, ISO, Geneva

  3. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, ISO, Geneva

  4. NEN 7779 (2008), Environment—measurement uncertainty, NEN, Delft, Netherlands

  5. AMC technical brief (2003) No. 15, Is my uncertainty estimate realistic? Royal Society of Chemistry. http://www.rsc.org

  6. Analytical Method Committee (2010) Accred Qual Assur 15:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LaBudde RA (2012) Statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies XXXV, reproducibility estimates from proficiency test data, TR322, least cost formulations, Virginia Beach, USA

  8. Koch M, Magnusson B (2012) Accred Qual Assur 17:399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Côté I, Robouch P, Robouch B, Bisson D, Gamache P, LeBlanc A, Dumas P, Perdneault M (2012) Accred Qual Assur 17:389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stefanelli P, Generali T, Barbini DA, Girolimetti S (2013) J Environ Sci Health Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 48(7):523–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Visser RG (2009) Accred Qual Assur 14:29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvis B, Corry JEL, Hedges AJ (2007) J Appl Microbiol 103(2):462–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Young WC, Roberton RS (eds) (1989) Turbine oil monitoring. ASTM International, STP1021

  14. Rand SJ (2003) Significance of tests for petroleum products, STP7, 7th edition. ASTM International

  15. Totten GE (ed) (2003) Fuels and lubricants, handbook: technology, properties, performance and testing. ASTM Manual Series: MNL 37 WCD. ASTM International

  16. ASTM D445-2014e1, Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids. ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19428-2959, United States

  17. ISO 3104:1994/Cor 1:1997, Petroleum products—transparent and opaque liquids—determination of kinematic viscosity and calculation of dynamic viscosity. ISO, Geneva

  18. ASTM D2162-2014, Standard practice for basic calibration of master viscometers and viscosity oil standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19428-2959, United States

  19. Visser RG (2006) Accred Qual Assur 10:521–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson M, Ellison SLR (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horwitz W, Kamps LR, Boyer KW (1980) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:1344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson M, Wood R (2006) Accred Qual Assur 10:471. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0040-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. PT-data. http://www.iisnl.com. Section ‘news and reports’

  24. Rosner B (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ISO 21748:2010—Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. ISO, Geneva

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert George Visser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Visser, R.G., Nijssen-Wester, C. Estimation of reproducibility and measurement uncertainty of a viscosity test method from proficiency test data. Accred Qual Assur 20, 125–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1110-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1110-y

Keywords

Navigation