Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure the same constructs across time?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Women's Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is the most widely used measure for screening for depression in perinatal populations. A weakness is that the factor structure of the scale is inconsistent across studies. It is unclear the degree to which this inconsistency results from variability arising from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The present study aimed to determine whether the EPDS factor structure remained stable in the same individuals reporting on their levels of distress across two testing occasions. Data were analysed for 636 postpartum inpatient females who were administered the EPDS at admission and discharge from a psychiatric mother and baby unit. Exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted separately on the admission and discharge data to determine the optimal factor structure at each time point. The EFAs and CFAs supported a two-factor model at admission and a three-factor model at discharge. Given that the EPDS did not demonstrate an invariant number of factors, no further tests of measurement invariance were conducted. The EPDS does not appear to be invariant from admission to discharge. These findings suggest that individuals may respond differently to items depending on their level of distress. Potential implications for the EPDS in terms of comparability of scores across groups/time and its screening abilities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adouard F, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NMC, Golse B (2005) Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 8(2):89–95

  • Agampodi SB, Agampodi TC (2013) Antenatal depression in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka and the factor structure of the Sinhalese version of Edinburgh post partum depression scale among pregnant women. PloS One 8(7):e69708

  • Astbury J, Brown S, Lumley J, Small R (1994) Birth events, birth experiences and social differences in postnatal depression. Aust J Public Health 18(2):176–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88(3):588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle JÃ, Aarre TF, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Holsten F (2003) Screening for postnatal depression: validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression. J Affect Disord 76(1):151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom D (2006) When does measurement invariance matter? Med Care 44(11):S176–S181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd RC, Le HN, Somberg R (2005) Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression. Arch Womens Ment Health 8(3):141–153. doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0096-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers EPM, van Baar AL, Pop VJM (2001) Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? J Psychosom Res 51(5):659–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabrol H, Teissedre F (2004) Relation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks postpartum. J Reprod Infant Psychol 22(1):33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen FF (2008) What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. J Pers Soc Psychol 95(5):1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LA, Watson D (1991) Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 100(3):316–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150(6):782–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cudeck R, Browne MW (1983) Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivar Behav Res 18(2):147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham NK, Brown PM, Brooks J, Page AC (2013) The structure of emotional symptoms in the postpartum period: is it unique? J Affect Disord 151(2):686–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Ove Samuelsen S (2001) Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104(4):243–249. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 4(3):272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J, McKenzie-McHarg K, Shakespeare J, Price J, Gray R (2009) A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatr Scand 119(5):350–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich SE (2006) Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Med Care 44(11 Suppl 3):S78

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guedeney N, Fermanian J (1998) Validation study of the French version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): new results about use and psychometric properties. European Psychiatry 13(2):83–89

  • Hartley CM, Barroso N, Rey Y, Pettit JW, Bagner DM (2014) Factor structure and psychometric properties of English and Spanish versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale among Hispanic women in a primary care setting. J Clin Psychol 70:1240–1250

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heron J, O’Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V (2004) The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord 80(1):65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L t, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomeen J, Martin CR (2005) Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 23(2):143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomeen J, Martin CR (2007) Replicability and stability of the multidimensional model of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in late pregnancy. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 14(3):319–324. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01084.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee King PA (2012) Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status. Arch Womens Ment Health 15(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 33(3):335–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massoudi P, Hwang CP, Wickberg B (2013) How well does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale identify depression and anxiety in fathers? A validation study in a population based Swedish sample. J Affect Disord 149(1):67–74

  • Matthey S (2008) Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety 25(11):926–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazhari S, Nakhaee N (2007) Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Iranian sample. Arch Womens Ment Health 10(6):293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58(4):525–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millsap RE, Kwok O-M (2004) Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychol Methods 9(1):93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montazeri A, Torkan B, Omidvari S (2007) The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Psychiatry 7(1):11

  • Muthén BO (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for Classification in Health Publications (2002). The international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM). Geneva: National Centre for Classification in Health Publications

  • Phillips J, Charles M, Sharpe L, Matthey S (2009) Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants. J Affect Disord 118(1–3):101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pink B (2013) Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2011 – technical paper. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

  • Pop VJ, Komproe IH, van Son MJ (1992) Characteristics of the Edinburgh post natal depression scale in The Netherlands. J Affect Disord 26(2):105–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenheim M, Moraes C, Oliveira A, Lobato G (2011) Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): empirical evidence for a general factor. BMC Med Res Methodol 11(1):93

  • Ross LE, Evans SEG, Sellers EM, Romach MK (2003) Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Arch Womens Ment Health 6(1):51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sass DA (2011) Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. J Psychoeduc Assess 29(4):347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper AM, Rooney BL, Kay NR, Silva PD (1994) Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to identify postpartum depression in a clinical setting. J Reprod Med 39(8):620–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Small R, Lumley J, Yelland J, Brown S (2007) The performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in English speaking and non-English speaking populations in Australia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42(1):70–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville S, Dedman K, Hagan R, Oxnam E, Wettinger M, Byrne S . . . Page AC (2014). The Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale: development and preliminary validation. Arch Womens Ment Health 1–12

  • Töreki A, Andó B, Dudas RB, Dweik D, Janka Z, Kozinszky Z, Keresztúri A (2014) Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a screening tool for postpartum depression in a clinical sample in Hungary. Midwifery 30(8):911–918

  • Töreki A, Andó B, Keresztúri A, Sikovanyecz J, Dudas RB, Janka Z, . . . Pál A (2013) The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample. Midwifery 29(4):308–315

  • Tuohy A, McVey C (2008) Subscales measuring symptoms of non-specific depression, anhedonia, and anxiety in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 47:153–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vivilaki VG, Dafermos V, Kogevinas M, Bitsios P, Lionis C (2009) The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: translation and validation for a Greek sample. BMC Public Health 9:329

  • Widaman KF, Ferrer E, Conger RD (2010) Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: measuring the same construct across time. Child Dev Perspect 4(1):10–18. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Q, Gelaye B, Rondon M, Sánchez SE, García PJ, Sánchez E, Barrios YV, . . . Williams MA (2014) Comparative performance of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening antepartum depression. J Affect Disord 162:1–7

Download references

Acknowledgments

NKC was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a University of Western Australia Safety Net Top-Up Scholarship. The authors would like to thank the women who participated in this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia K. Cunningham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunningham, N.K., Brown, P.M. & Page, A.C. Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure the same constructs across time?. Arch Womens Ment Health 18, 793–804 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-014-0485-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-014-0485-9

Keywords

Navigation