Abstract
The development of new vaccines remains an attractive goal for disease prevention and therapy, in combination or alternative to drug-based treatment. In parallel, a growing awareness of the importance of early diagnosis in successful disease management is driving the demand for new reliable diagnostic tools. As a consequence, over the last decades an impressive amount of work has been directed toward the search for new solutions to address vaccine design and biomarker discovery. In this context, peptides have generated considerable interest thanks to their general accessibility and ease of manipulation. The aim of this review is to provide the reader a general picture of the traditional peptide-based strategies adopted in immunology and to report on recent advances made in this field, highlighting advantages and limitations of classic versus innovative approaches. Case studies are described to provide illustrative examples, and cross references to more topic-focused and exhaustive reviews are proposed throughout the text.
Similar content being viewed by others
General concepts to epitope prediction and design
Disclosing the molecular mechanisms that drive biologically relevant processes is a fundamental goal for biological chemistry. Understanding how biomolecules interact, unveiling which key interactions are involved in cellular pathways and revealing which of them are misregulated in the development of a pathological condition may help defining new targets for pharmacological intervention. As proteins modulate the majority of biological functions, exploiting structural information on how protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are controlled at the atomic level can pave the way toward their rational manipulation. In this context, the popularity of peptides as modulators/inhibitors of PPIs has consistently grown over the last few years, thanks to the synthetic accessibility and flexible application potential of these molecules. For instance, peptides and peptidomimetics with different conformational dynamic properties and designed structural preferences have been used to probe the role of conformational selection and preorganization in regulating key interactions involving proteins (Bock et al. 2013; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Goodman et al. 2007; Haridas 2009; Pedersen and Abell 2011; Souroujon and Mochly-Rosen 1998). The amount of knowledge generated by experimentally determined sequence–structure–function relationships contributed to lay the foundations for computational design methods. In general, computational peptide or protein design entails the search for peptidic sequences and amino acids that adopt defined structures and functions (Floris and Moro 2012; Fung et al. 2008; Nikiforovich 2009; Renfrew et al. 2012; Yin et al. 2007). Computational methods have further evolved into the re-design of protein–protein interfaces. The work of Kortemme (Mandell and Kortemme 2009; Smith and Kortemme 2010), Kuhlman (Der et al. 2012; Lewis and Kuhlman 2011; Sammond et al. 2011), Baker (Fleishman et al. 2011; Koga et al. 2012; Richter et al. 2012) provides elegant examples of how interfaces can be redesigned to modulate in vitro functions. These efforts brought about the realization that functional protein/peptide interactions are determined by a well-balanced interplay of sequence, physico-chemical, structural and conformational properties. As a consequence, predictions of protein interaction properties aimed at supporting the design of functional molecules should take into account not only sequence and structural similarities or homologies, but also the dynamic and energetic properties that occur at protein interfaces (Hoffman et al. 2005; Keskin 2007; Sheinerman et al. 2000; Ulucan et al. 2012; Zen et al. 2010).
Among other fields, these concepts find application in immunology where considerable effort has been put into developing platforms to screen candidate protein antigens and to identify/predict minimal antigenic regions (epitopes) responsible for immunoreactivity. In particular, a lot of interest has been conveyed toward the antibody-mediated (humoral) components of the immune system since, due to their peculiar role and activity, antibodies can represent valuable tools for both therapy and diagnosis (Peters 2000; Waldmann 1991). Indeed, the identification of reactive antigen regions that are determinant for antibody elicitation and recognition still represents an attractive and challenging opportunity for predictive rational-based computational methods. Epitopes are conventionally classified as continuous, i.e., sequential and relatively short peptides from the protein sequence able to bind anti-antigen antibodies, or discontinuous, i.e., patch of atoms/fragments from not-contiguous protein regions which are brought to close proximity by protein folding and whose antigenicity depends upon the protein conformation. It is worth underlining that epitopes do not exist as discrete and structured entities, but rather have fuzzy boundaries and are defined by their functional ability to bind antibodies (Van Regenmortel 2009a). While continuous epitopes can in theory be predicted out of the protein sequence by consensus of available datasets of immunogenic peptides (Greenbaum et al. 2007), the prediction of discontinuous epitopes relies upon the knowledge of the protein 3D structure. Over the last few decades, several approaches have been tested to run epitope prediction from protein structure. Some groups attempted to correlate antigenicity with protein region properties such as solvent accessibility or flexibility (Novotný et al. 1986; Westhof et al. 1984). For instance, electrostatic desolvation profiles (EDP) method hypothesizes that surface protein regions with a small free energy penalty for water removal may correspond to preferred interaction sites and may, accordingly, in the case of antigens, constitute binding sites for antibodies (Fiorucci and Zacharias 2010). Others based their approach on identifying those regions that protrude out of the protein globular surface and relating them to antigenicity (Ponomarenko et al. 2008; Thornton et al. 1986). In a reverse approach, Molina and colleagues targeted the identification of epitopes within the protein structure through a bioinformatic analysis of sets of mimitope sequences, i.e., randomly generated peptides mimicking epitopes functional antibody recognition properties (Moreau et al. 2006). By integrating mimitopes’ alignments and consensus, the authors were able to identify the original epitope regions targeted by antibodies within the native antigen in a series of case models where antibody–antigen crystal structures were available. In this direction, our group has recently developed a new way to approach in silico epitope prediction based on the integrated analysis of the dynamical and energetic properties of an antigen, namely matrix of local coupling energies (MLCE) (Scarabelli et al. 2010). The key assumption of MLCE method is that epitopes may correspond to protein regions that are not involved in stabilizing interactions within the protein fold, since they must continuously evolve to escape recognition by the immune system without affecting protein functional structure. To be recognized by a (antibody) binding partner, these regions should also well tolerate conformational changes with minimal energetic expense. Accordingly, MLCE prediction is based on antigen structure analysis identifying those localized regions that are less energetically coupled with the rest of the protein, and that consequentially fit basic criteria for representing epitope candidates. To date, the MLCE method found successful application in epitopes prediction for proteins FABP3 and S100B (Peri et al. 2013) and for the discovery of biomarker and vaccine candidates for the Burkholderia Pseudomallei pathogen (Lassaux et al. 2013). MCLE and EDP methods, along with many others, are intrinsically limited to predict regions exposed on the protein surface. As a methodological evolution, in silico dissection of proteins into domains prior to epitope prediction may expose low-accessibility regions that may be targeted by antibodies under conditions of partial unfolding/degradation, thus improving prediction performances (Genoni et al. 2012). By applying this strategy, we indeed showed an improved match between theoretical and experimental epitope mapping (Lassaux et al. 2013).
A landmark integration of atomic-resolution information with computational techniques was reported by Schief and collaborators working on a hybrid method for the grafting of functional motifs onto unrelated protein scaffolds to accurately replicate the antigenic surface recognized by target antibodies (Azoitei et al. 2011; Correia et al. 2010; Ofek et al. 2010). Epitope scaffolding strategy, by mimicking complex antigenic targets, might be particularly useful to reproduce discontinuous epitopes and enhance the extent of the immune response against antigens for which elicitation of antibodies has been demonstrated to be particularly challenging (e.g., transient, immunorecessive, cryptic). Indeed, the scaffold-supported antigen is ‘presented’ in a context that lacks pathogen defensive mechanisms that have evolved to elude the immune response (Burton 2010). In one case example, the authors’ work focused on transplanting a two-segment discontinuous HIV gp120 epitope on a suitable scaffold that may accommodate the entering motif without altering its original functional conformation (Azoitei et al. 2011). Scaffold selection and design for optimal motif transplantation were computationally assisted, as well as the generation of a small set of mutagenesis libraries to undergo functional screening. The authors were able to generate a scaffold-bound motif displaying specificity and affinity for antibody recognition similar to the original gp120. This strategy may be then potentially suitable for using grafted epitopes as immunogens to elicit neutralizing antibodies.
Overall, many different approaches have been exploited toward epitope identification, prediction and design. The need to overcome limits associated to mere (time consuming) experimental methods has strongly oriented research in this area toward computationally assisted schemes, where information from experimental evidence is merged with in silico methodologies to investigate protein ‘interactome’. As general knowledge is progressing, new perspectives and solutions are expected to come to light. The generation of more and more reliable methods to approach complex models might then represent a closer step toward the full realization of rational-based manipulation of PPIs. In this scenario, the fast prediction and successful design of epitope candidates aimed to finalize their therapeutical/diagnostic application is not out of reach.
Peptides as vaccine candidates
Despite the progresses made in the field of drug discovery, vaccination still remains an inescapable approach in modern medicine. Indeed, the increasing incidence of drug resistance, which conventional antibiotic therapies are facing, poses a serious threat to maintaining the current public health status (Loddenkemper and Hauer 2010; Nikaido 2009). In addition, a strong demand for vaccine development is arising for the prevention of noninfectious diseases such as cancer, for which immunotherapy may represent a valid alternative/adjuvant to pharmacological treatment (Sharav et al. 2007; Tsunoda 2004). Last but not least, the access to prolonged and expensive drug-based therapies still remains a major issue in the less developed countries, making disease prevention more desirable. Vaccines have traditionally consisted of attenuated or inactivated microorganisms delivered by injection. However, since a series of inherent practical issues is associated to this approach along with increasing safety demands from regulation authorities, research in the vaccine field has witnessed a growing interest toward attempts to develop protein- and peptide-based vaccine candidates (Purcell et al. 2007). In this context, reverse vaccinology (RV) (Masignani et al. 2002) and structure-based antigen design (Dormitzer et al. 2008), a.k.a. structural vaccinology (SV) techniques, have generated high expectations toward a ‘new era’ of fast and safe vaccine development (Fig. 1). RV encompasses in silico pathogen genome analysis aimed to identify those protein antigens that, among all, are most likely to represent vaccine candidates (e.g., cell-surface exposure, protein stability). Candidate identification disregards traditional limitations such as whether an antigen is abundantly or modestly expressed, whether it is constantly or temporarily expressed and whether it is easily isolated or not. Virtually, all genes of a pathogen can be screened, enabling this platform to generate vaccine candidates in a fast, safe and effective way even for pathogens against which classical approaches have failed. With regard to SV, the approach relies on the concept that by knowing which parts of an antigen are effectively responsible for antigenicity, it is possible to engineer the native antigen to improve its feasibility as vaccine candidate. In particular, identifying those components within the antigen structure that elicit protecting immunity allows performing antigen manipulation driven by structural considerations (e.g., domain stabilization, conformational constraints). In this way, efforts toward vaccine optimization can be focused on those antigen regions that play a significant role in immunity. As a further development of the SV approach, it may then be viable to select only the antigen regions able to elicit an immune response and translate them in the form of peptides as potential vaccine candidates. Although often underestimated, there are several advantages to peptide-based vaccine approaches over traditional ones, ranging from avoiding the injection of infectious and potentially harmful material to the ease of synthesis, manipulation and storage with respect to in vitro culture and handling of dangerous pathogens and to the possibility of focusing on the use of minimal immunogenic regions of a protein antigen (Purcell et al. 2007). While very promising, regardless of the considerable efforts, the full realization of peptide-based approach toward vaccine development is still to be fulfilled (Van Regenmortel 2009b). Nevertheless, the search for new strategies to deliver peptide vaccines remains vivid, as potential advantages may overcome current limitations.
The goal of vaccination is to stimulate an antigen-specific response, possibly involving both the cellular (CD8+ cytotoxic and CD4+ helper T cells) and humoral (antibody) components of the immune system. The antigen specificity resides in its minimal regions that are responsible for immunoreactivity, namely epitopes. Due to the different mechanism by which humoral and cellular responses are generated (Fig. 2), requirements for peptide epitope design differ substantially. As the T cell-mediated response follows a complex intracellular antigen processing pathway, only little conformational requirements, if any, have to be taken into account in designing epitopes to induce a CTL-mediated response (Purcell et al. 2007). On the contrary, to elicit a specific antibody response that recognizes the parent antigen, a peptide epitope should in principle trace the conformational properties of the native antigenic region. Unfortunately, only in few cases short peptides extracted out of their original context possess a conformation that mimics the one they adopt within the native antigen (Van Regenmortel 2009b). Thus, despite that in any case an antibody response might be generated against a peptide epitope, antibodies might not be cross-reactive toward the parent antigen. Consequently, unless the peptide used for immunization mimics or is forced to mimic the conformation of the corresponding native antigenic region, elicited antibodies are unlikely to cross-react specifically with the parent protein. Several approaches are available to induce a correct folding of free peptides, but previous knowledge of the whole antigen structure is therefore necessary (Purcell et al. 2003). Moreover, the fact that most protein epitopes are actually discontinuous, i.e., are formed by groups of atoms belonging to residues located on not-contiguous protein segments that are brought together by the peptide chain folding, is often underestimated (Van Regenmortel 2009a). Thus, it is not surprising that most continuous epitopes are not able to elicit really neutralizing antibodies. In recent years, the work of some groups has focused on attempts to reproduce complex discontinuous epitopes by means of synthetic constructs. This approach is usually based on anchoring different peptide sequences to synthetic scaffolds, to contemporarily block peptide conformations and bring in close contact sequences which are assumed to be part of a discontinuous epitope. In this context, it is worth citing the work by Liskamp and collaborators on antigen surface mimicking by the use of a triazacyclophane (TAC) scaffold (Fig. 3a); (Hijnen et al. 2007; Mul der et al. 2012), as well as the functional reconstruction of conformational epitopes by means of the CLIPS technology (Chemical Linkage of Peptides onto Scaffolds) reported by (Fig. 3b) Timmerman et al. (2007, 2009). While the potential of these strategies is still to be fully demonstrated, this kind of approach appears to be promising. As a further complication, inherent limitations to peptide-based vaccination come from the small size of peptide molecules and the low copy number of peptide-based immunogens, along with their poor immunogenicity when administered in the absence of a vaccine adjuvant (Hervé et al. 1997; Van Regenmortel 2001). Traditionally, these problems have been addressed by the conjugation of peptides to protein carriers (BSA, KLH, OVA, etc.) to serve both as delivery systems for multiple epitopes display and as T-helper epitopes source for response amplification (Chiarella et al. 2010). Despite this strategy being widely used, it still suffers from poor homogeneity of peptide-carrier adduct composition and of possible alterations of epitope integrity following conjugation (Briand et al. 1985). Moreover, carrier-induced antigen suppression, i.e., induction of an antibody response against the carrier to a much greater extent than toward the epitope can occur (Herzenberg et al. 1980; Schutze et al. 1985). Multiple antigen display was elegantly pioneered by Tam and co-workers, who first introduced the concept of multiple antigen presentation (MAP) by use of branched oligolysine constructs bearing multiple epitopes (Francis et al. 1991; Huang et al. 1994). Since then, many groups have reported on the advantages of branched over linear peptides as better immunogens (Fitzmaurice et al. 2000; Rosenthal 2005; Schott et al. 1996), paving the way to the search for alternative strategies to combine multiple epitopes in a controlled way. For instance, Jackson and collaborators conceived the synthesis of multi-peptide polymers, by introducing an N-terminal acrylated residue to single peptide epitopes followed by radical-free polymerization to generate a covalently bound platform displaying several copies of the same epitope/different epitopes (Brien-simpson et al. 1997; Jackson et al. 1997; Sadler et al. 2002). Others explored the use of dendrimers (Kowalczyk et al. 2010). More in general, with the progressive development of chemoselective synthetic and conjugation techniques, many strategies have been applied to multiple antigen presentation (Fujita and Taguchi 2011). One critical aspect in the development of peptide vaccines is their low immunogenicity as single entities, as a consequence of their weak activation of antigen-presenting cells (APC) such as dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages, which in turn play a key role in activating B and T lymphocytes. Thus, conventional peptide vaccine formulations usually include adjuvants (e.g., complete Freud’s adjuvant, CFA) to favor the onset of an immune response (Wang 2011). However, most of the adjuvants commonly used in animal vaccination protocols are toxic and therefore not suitable for human administration. The synthesis of platforms bearing both peptide epitopes and a lipophilic moiety is now considered a valuable way to produce self-adjuvanting constructs that allow overcoming intrinsic low peptide immunogenicity (Moyle and Toth 2008). Indeed, bacterial lipid components such as tripalmitoyl-S-glyceryl cysteine (Pam3Cys) and Pam2Cys are known agonists of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) family, a class of receptors expressed on the surface of a wide variety of cells including APC and whose activation is a key step in the generation of an immune response (Jackson et al. 2004; Zhu et al. 2004). Therefore, lipopeptides have found broad application as candidates for vaccine development, since in addition to immunogenicity enhancement none of the side effects associated with the use of adjuvants is usually encountered (Galdiero et al. 2012; Zeng et al. 2002). Similarly, proteins/peptides glycosylation is known to play an important role in immunity, especially in the T-cell stimulation, as carbohydrates act facilitating the cellular uptake through a receptor-mediated internalization (e.g., mannose receptors) (Rudd et al. 1999, 2004; Rudd 2001). It is then not surprising that a deep interest in glycopeptides has been found in the field of synthetic vaccine candidates (Bay et al. 1997; Fujita et al. 2008; Kowalczyk et al. 2012).
In recent years, the field of vaccine development has experienced a growing awareness of the importance of the way through which an antigen is presented to fully ‘realize’ its immunogenic potential. Particularly, considerable interest has been shown in the use of nanoparticles as vaccine delivery systems (Akagi et al. 2012; Foster et al. 2010; Uto et al. 2009; Yoshikawa et al. 2008; Zolnik et al. 2010). Notably, nanoparticles prepared from biocompatible and biodegradable polymers have been proposed not only as mere vaccine carriers, but also as potent immune response adjuvants. Antigen-loaded nanoparticles are indeed claimed to target and activate more specifically APCs, at the same time allowing controlling intracellular antigen release. As further evolution, the interest of many groups is now oriented on the development of peptide-based self-assembling systems, which were shown to be suitable devices to address multiple antigen presentation and self-adjuvation. An elegant explanatory case was reported by Toth and co-workers working on the group A streptococci (GAS) (Skwarczynski et al. 2010). The authors synthesized a polyacrylate dendritic structure that was used as scaffold to attach several copies of a peptide antigen. The whole construct was shown to self-assemble in nanoparticles (20 nm in diameter) possessing a polymeric core and peripherally exposing the antigenic peptide epitope on the particle surface (Fig. 3c). Mice immunization resulted in the production of high titers of antigen-specific antibodies without the need of further adjuvants, validating the initial assumption of a self-adjuvanting system. More recently, Payne and collaborators reported on the design and synthesis of a tricomponent cancer vaccine candidate that consisted of a glycopeptide or peptide antigen, a universal T-helper peptide epitope and a lipophilic moiety as immunoadjuvant (Wilkinson et al. 2012). The system spontaneously self-assembled to form discrete nanoparticles and was shown to be fully self-adjuvanting and to induce a strong and selective humoral response in murine models. As proofs of concepts of the effectiveness of self-adjuvanting and self-assembling systems keep emerging, the interest toward their further development is expected to grow over the next few years.
In conclusion, a tremendous amount of work has been done so far in the search for a peptide-based vaccine development strategy. Although a truly satisfactory success has yet to be reached, new valuable approaches and strategies to overcome traditional limitations are becoming available. Key considerations driving future development efforts might involve improved antigen candidate selection and design, a better understanding of the role of epitope conformation, a more reliable control over it and the realization of complex but well-defined platforms for peptide antigen display and delivery.
Peptides: tools for biomarker discovery
A biomarker can be defined as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention” (Biomarkers definition working group 2001). Over recent years, the increased diffusion of pathologies such as autoimmune diseases and of problems related to pathogen drug resistance, along with sustained efforts in cancer and neurological disorders research, has produced a growing interest in the discovery of new biomarkers as selective tools for disease diagnosis, staging, follow-up and personalization of therapy (Baker 2005; Frank and Hargreaves 2003; Ludwig and Weinstein 2005). It is now widely assumed that an early and timely diagnosis can have a deep impact on disease progression. This is particularly important for those pathologies for which effective therapies are still missing or that are susceptible to misdiagnosis, leading to wrong and potentially harmful treatment. However, biomarkers identification is not always easy, since for many pathologies the molecular causes that trigger disease onset and progression are not known. Furthermore, to be fully reliable a biomarker should be truly specific for a particular biological/pathological status, not leaving space for doubtful interpretation.
In this direction a considerable help comes from the immune system itself, which is ‘designed’ to selectively recognize the presence of non-self entities and to evoke a protective response against them (Gonzalez et al. 2011; Katsikis et al. 2007). Indeed, an adaptive immune response, either humoral (B cell mediated) and/or cellular (T cell mediated), is usually associated with a pathological status, whether considering cancer, an immune-mediated disease or an infective pathology. Of particular interest to biomarker discovery, the immune system acts amplifying particular antibodies that recognize disease-specific antigens. In this context, the detection of those antibodies in the patient biological fluids that are overproduced in a disease status can represent a valuable diagnostic indicator to drive its clinical management (Anderson and LaBaer 2005). As a consequence, attempts to identify candidate biomarkers have traditionally focused on the screening of putative antigen arrays against easily accessible biological fluids to capture overproduced antibodies which may represent good indicators of a pathogenic condition (Blennow et al. 2010; Robinson et al. 2002). In this scenario, the use of peptide libraries in place of whole antigens may represent a faster, more flexible and easily accessible way to target antibody recognition. A focused approach may be offered by small peptide libraries that are designed to represent only those antigen regions that are likely to be responsible for antigen–antibody interaction, i.e., for immunoreactivity. An example is given by our recent work on melioidosis, an endemic and potentially lethal disease spreading in tropical and subtropical regions, which is often misdiagnosed as tuberculosis and consequently mistreated (How and Liam 2006). Working on a collection of protein antigens of the B. Pseudomallei pathogen, melioidosis etiological agent (Wiersinga et al. 2006), we used their 3D structures as the basis for the prediction of potential antibody-binding regions by means of our recently developed MCLE method (Scarabelli et al. 2010). Predictions were then converted in the synthesis of candidate peptides, which were spotted on an ELISA plate and screened for immunoreactivity against sera from healthy donors, and seropositive and seronegative patients. In the case of the OppA antigen (Lassaux et al. 2013), we were able to identify one peptide (COMP3) that showed very interesting discrimination properties, being differently reactive with respect to the three patient groups. Thus, an inherent potential for diagnostic purposes was proven. Notably, COMP3 peptide design was successful out of only three peptides tested, proving the possibility to efficiently connect antigen structure analysis, peptide synthesis and immunoreactivity testing. Working on the same target, a complementary experimental approach based on immunocapturing and proteolytic digestion provided more peptide biomarker candidates (Lassaux et al. 2013). The application of this ‘mixed’ method is currently ongoing on other B. Pseudomallei protein antigens (OmpA, FliC, BPSL 1050, BPSL 0919) with promising preliminary results, especially for the OmpA antigen for whom we were able to deliver a highly and specific immunoreactive synthetic peptide, which was not only able to distinguish among the three patient groups, but also even recognized to the same extent as the whole recombinant protein antigen. As an obvious limitation, MCLE-based strategy is not suitable for those cases where antigens that trigger primary immune response (primary antigens) or their structure are unknown, and more in general the method is biased by the fact that it may not take into account the wide range of post-translational modifications that can be responsible for the development of a pathological condition, which finds an illustrative example in the case of autoimmune diseases (Lindstrom and Robinson 2011). Autoimmune diseases are in fact usually generated by either native or aberrant post-translational modifications of self-proteins that can affect the tolerance of the immune system toward a protein antigen (neo-antigen) and lead to the development of a self-directed immune response (Anderton 2004; Doyle and Mamula 2001). Partially due to this reason, traditional proteomic-based approaches aimed at biomarkers’ identification in autoimmune diseases have often proven unsuccessful. In this case, the use of synthetic peptide libraries that include a wide range of post-translational modifications that occur in proteins, thus generating potential mimetic of the neo-antigens, is surely a valuable approach [for a more extensive review on the topic see (Papini 2009)]. Modifications such as acetylation, glycosylation and citrullination, which cover a part of the possible ones responsible for neo-antigens generation, can indeed be specifically and more easily introduced into peptides with respect to recombinant proteins. This offers a powerful tool to generate candidate biomarkers able to detect autoantibodies in biological fluids. In this strategy, namely ‘chemical reverse approach’ (Alcaro et al. 2007), the autoantibodies ‘select’ those modified peptides which resemble the newly generated antigenic regions that trigger the immune response at the origin of the disease. Thus, the chemical reverse approach is in principle able to identify the side-chain modifications effectively responsible for pathology development. After the identification of candidate biomarkers, structure–activity relationship studies can follow to fully characterize the antigen–antibody binding and to lead candidate peptide development toward high specificity of recognition. Examples of this approach validation can be found in the field of systemic lupus erythematosus (Mahler et al. 2005), rheumatoid arthritis (Girbal-Neuhauser et al. 1999; Vossenaar and Van Venrooij 2004) and in a series of papers by Papini and co-workers on multiple sclerosis where a glycopeptide probe for autoantibodies detection was firstly discovered and then developed by an accurate and extensive refinement work (Carotenuto et al. 2001, 2008; Lolli et al. 2005a, b; Mazzucco et al. 1999; Papini 2005). More recently, Kodadek and collaborators tackled biomarker discovery for pathological conditions for which primary antigens are unknown from a new point of view (Reddy et al. 2011). Rather than focusing on attempts to identify the antigen itself or a close mimic to it, they assumed work in a fully unnatural chemical space, i.e., to use combinatorial libraries of unnatural synthetic molecules that may cover a conformational space not represented by unmodified biomolecules. The key concept behind this approach is that, as the primary immune response to some diseases follows an initial marked aberration in a biomolecule, unnatural molecules are more likely to adopt shapes that allow the binding to antibodies generated in response to the original structural modification with respect to naturally occurring molecules, since those shapes cannot be formed by unmodified molecules. Molecules able to bind selectively antibodies elicited against their triggering agent can be seen as antigen surrogates and can display potential for diagnosis. The authors validated their approach by screening libraries of peptoids (N-substituted oligoglycines) against sera from patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and were able to identify two candidate antibody biomarkers. Not being focused on mimicking a particular antigen, this approach is claimed to be broadly applicable toward the rapid discovery of antibody biomarkers by high-throughput screening of synthetic molecules.
In summary, even if in recent years great expectations have arisen toward modern protein technologies to drive biomarker discovery, they are still to be fully met. Particularly in the case of autoimmune diseases, cancer and neurological disorders, approaches to new candidate biomarker identification are now shifting from traditional antigen arrays toward the application of new strategies bypassing prior antigen knowledge, similarly to recent schemes in the field of drug discovery. Nevertheless, in cases where antigens are known, new design techniques and rational-driven optimization work may represent an added value that could enlarge discovery possibilities. Given their prompt access and ease of manipulation with respect to more complex antigens, the use of peptides and their mimics or derivatives as fundamental tools to satisfactorily address biomarkers discovery is then expected to keep growing.
Conclusion
Over recent years, the scientific community has been struggling to fully realize the potential and the hopes which the advent of the ‘-omic era’ has brought with it. In particular, the development of new and effective methodologies to fulfill unmet therapeutic needs has witnessed a switch from empirical-based to rationally driven approaches, a scenario where computational techniques have found fertile ground. The birth of cutting edge methodologies to assist and accelerate data analysis and comprehension of molecular mechanisms involved in pathological conditions is opening the way for new solutions, for therapeutics and diagnostics. In this context, peptide science constitutes an appealing resource, since, in terms of accessibility and flexibility, enormous advantages are potentially associated with the use of peptides and derivatives in place of whole proteins. It is then not surprising that the interest peptides have aroused in the immunology field has considerably grown in recent times. Although a true feasibility of peptides as vaccine candidates that may lead to their wide application is yet to be demonstrated, emerging considerations, along with awareness of current limitations and new strategies to overcome them, keep this prospective alive. Nonetheless, peptides are finding increasing application in the discovery of new biomarkers, which still remains an attractive target to effectively tackle disease management. Following previous considerations, interest in peptide immunology is thus expected to remain vivid in the future, with the hope of finally achieving worthy goals which current efforts are attempting to address.
References
Akagi T, Baba M, Akashi M (2012) Biodegradable nanoparticles as vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems : regulation of immune responses by nanoparticle-based vaccine. Adv Polym Sci 247:31–64
Alcaro MC, Lolli F, Migliorini P et al (2007) Peptides as autoimmune diseases antigenic probes––a peptide-based reverse approach to detect biomarkers of autoimmune diseases. Chem Today 25:14–16
Anderson KS, LaBaer J (2005) The sentinel within: exploiting the immune system for cancer biomarkers. J Proteome Res 4:1123–1133. doi:10.1021/pr0500814
Anderton SM (2004) Post-translational modifications of self antigens: implications for autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 16:753–758
Azoitei ML, Correia BE, Ban Y-EA et al (2011) Computation-guided backbone grafting of a discontinuous motif onto a protein scaffold. Science 334:373–376. doi:10.1126/science.1209368
Baker M (2005) In biomarkers we trust? Nat Biotech 23:297–304. doi:10.1038/nbt0305-297
Bay S, Lo-Man R, Osinaga E et al (1997) Preparation of a multiple antigen glycopeptide (MAG) carrying the Tn antigen. A possible approach to a synthetic carbohydrate vaccine. J Pept Res 49:620–625
Biomarkers definition working group (2001) Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical Pharmacol Therap 69:89–95. doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.113989
Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 6:131–144
Bock JE, Gavenonis J, Kritzer Ja (2013) Getting in shape: controlling peptide bioactivity and bioavailability using conformational constraints. ACS Chem Biol 8:488–499. doi:10.1021/cb300515u
Briand JP, Muller S, Van Regenmortel MH (1985) Synthetic peptides as antigens: pitfalls of conjugation methods. J Immunol Meth 78:59–69
Brien-simpson NMO, Ede NJ, Brown LE et al (1997) Polymerization of unprotected synthetic peptides: a view toward synthetic peptide vaccines. J Am Chem Soc 7863:1183–1188
Burton DR (2010) Scaffolding to build a rational vaccine design strategy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17859–17860. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012923107
Ca Smith, Kortemme T (2010) Structure-based prediction of the peptide sequence space recognized by natural and synthetic PDZ domains. J Mol Biol 402:460–474. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.032
Carotenuto A, D’Ursi AM, Nardi E et al (2001) Conformational analysis of a glycosylated human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide epitope able to detect antibody response in multiple sclerosis. J Med Chem 44:2378–2381
Carotenuto A, Alcaro MC, Saviello MR et al (2008) Designed glycopeptides with different beta-turn types as synthetic probes for the detection of autoantibodies as biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. J Med Chem 51:5304–5309. doi:10.1021/jm800391y
Chatterjee J, Gilon C, Hoffman A, Kessler H (2008) N-methylation of peptides: a new perspective in medicinal chemistry. Acc Chem Res 41:1331–1342. doi:10.1021/ar8000603
Chiarella P, Edelmann B, Fazio VM et al (2010) Antigenic features of protein carriers commonly used in immunisation trials. Biotech Lett 32:1215–1221. doi:10.1007/s10529-010-0283-z
Correia BE, Ban Y-EA, Holmes Ma et al (2010) Computational design of epitope-scaffolds allows induction of antibodies specific for a poorly immunogenic HIV vaccine epitope. Structure 18:1116–1126. doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.06.010
Der BS, Edwards DR, Kuhlman B (2012) Catalysis by a de novo zinc-mediated protein interface: implications for natural enzyme evolution and rational enzyme engineering. Biochemistry 51:3933–3940. doi:10.1021/bi201881p
Dormitzer PR, Ulmer JB, Rappuoli R (2008) Structure-based antigen design: a strategy for next generation vaccines. Trends Biotech 26:659–667. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.08.002
Fiorucci S, Zacharias M (2010) Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites using covering algorithms. Biophys J 98:1921–1930
Fitzmaurice CJ, Brown LE, Kronin V, Jackson DC (2000) The geometry of synthetic peptide-based immunogens affects the efficiency of T cell stimulation by professional antigen-presenting cells. Internat Immunol 12:527–535
Fleishman SJ, Ta Whitehead, Ekiert DC et al (2011) Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332:816–821. doi:10.1126/science.1202617
Floris M, Moro S (2012) Mimicking peptides… in silico. Mol Inform 31:12–20. doi:10.1002/minf.201100093
Foster S, Duvall CL, Crownover EF et al (2010) Intracellular delivery of a protein antigen with an endosomal-releasing polymer enhances CD8 T-cell production and prophylactic vaccine efficacy. Bioconj Chem 21:2205–2212. doi:10.1021/bc100204m
Francis MJ, Hastings GZ, Brown F et al (1991) Immunological evaluation of the multiple antigen peptide (MAP) system using the major immunogenic site of foot–mouth disease virus. Immunology 73:249–254
Frank R, Hargreaves R (2003) Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:566–580. doi:10.1038/nrd1130
Fujita Y, Taguchi H (2011) Current status of multiple antigen-presenting peptide vaccine systems: application of organic and inorganic nanoparticles. Chem Cent J 5:48. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-5-48
Fujita Y, Abdel-Aal A-BM, Wimmer N et al (2008) Synthesis and immunological evaluation of self-adjuvanting glycolipopeptide vaccine candidates. Bioorg Med Chem 16:8907–8913. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.08.064
Fung HK, Welsh WJ, Floudas CA, Wood R (2008) Computational de novo peptide and protein design: rigid templates versus flexible templates. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:993–1001
Galdiero S, Vitiello M, Finamore E et al (2012) Activation of monocytic cells by immunostimulatory lipids conjugated to peptide antigens. Mol BioSyst 8:3166–3177. doi:10.1039/c2mb25064k
Genoni A, Morra G, Colombo G (2012) Identification of domains in protein structures from the analysis of intramolecular interactions. J Phys Chem B 116:3331–3343. doi:10.1021/jp210568a
Girbal-Neuhauser E, Durieux JJ, Arnaud M et al (1999) The epitopes targeted by the rheumatoid arthritis-associated antifilaggrin autoantibodies are posttranslationally generated on various sites of (pro) filaggrin by deimination of arginine residues. J Immunol 162:585–594
Gonzalez S, González-Rodríguez AP, Suárez-Álvarez B et al (2011) Conceptual aspects of self and nonself discrimination. Selfnonself 2:19–25
Goodman CM, Choi S, Shandler S, DeGrado WF (2007) Foldamers as versatile frameworks for the design and evolution of function. Nat Chem Biol 3:252–262. doi:10.1038/nchembio876
Greenbaum JA, Andersen PH, Blythe M et al (2007) Towards a consensus on datasets and evaluation metrics for developing B-cell epitope prediction tools. J Mol Recognit JMR 20:75–82
Ha Doyle, Mamula MJ (2001) Post-translational protein modifications in antigen recognition and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol 22:443–449
Haridas V (2009) From peptides to non-peptide alpha-helix inducers and mimetics. Eur J Org Chem 2009:5112–5128. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200900280
Hervé M, Maillere B, Mourier G et al (1997) On the immunogenic properties of retro-inverso peptides. Total retro-inversion of T-cell epitopes causes a loss of binding to MHC II molecules. Mol Immunol 34:157–163
Herzenberg LA, Tokuhisa T, Herzenberg LA (1980) Carrier-priming leads to hapten-specific suppression. Nature 285:664–667. doi:10.1038/285664a0
Hijnen M, Van Zoelen DJ, Chamorro C et al (2007) A novel strategy to mimic discontinuous protective epitopes using a synthetic scaffold. Vaccine 25:6807–6817. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.027
Hoffman BM, Celis LM, Da Cull et al (2005) Differential influence of dynamic processes on forward and reverse electron transfer across a protein–protein interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3564–3569. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408767102
How SH, Liam CK (2006) Melioidosis: a potentially life threatening infection. Med J Malaysia 61:386–394 quiz 395
Huang W, Nardelli B, Tam JP (1994) Lipophilic multiple antigen peptide system for peptide immunogen and synthetic vaccine. Mol Immunol 31:1191–1199
Jackson DC, Brien-simpson NO, Brown LE, Ede NJ (1997) Free radical induced polymerization of synthetic peptides into polymeric immunogens. Vaccine 15:1697–1705
Jackson DC, Lau YF, Le T et al (2004) A totally synthetic vaccine of generic structure that targets toll-like receptor two on dendritic cells and promotes antibody or cytotoxic T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15440–15445
Katsikis PD, Schoenberger SP, Pulendran B (2007) Probing the “labyrinth” linking the innate and adaptive immune systems. Nat Immunol 8:899–901
Keskin O (2007) Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations: a case study of antibodies. BMC Struct Biol 7:31
Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G et al (2012) Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491:222–227. doi:10.1038/nature11600
Kowalczyk W, De la Torre BG, Andreu D (2010) Strategies and limitations in dendrimeric immunogen synthesis. The influenza virus M2e epitope as a case study. Bioconj Chem 21:102–110. doi:10.1021/bc9003316
Kowalczyk W, Mascaraque A, Sánchez-Navarro M et al (2012) Convergent synthesis of glycodendropeptides by click chemistry approaches. Eur J Org Chem 2012:4565–4573. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201200428
Lassaux P, Peri C, Ferrer-Navarro M et al (2013) A structure-based strategy for epitope discovery in Burkholderia pseudomallei OppA antigen. Structure 21:167–175. doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.10.005
Lewis SM, Ba Kuhlman (2011) Anchored design of protein–protein interfaces. PloS one 6:e20872. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020872
Lindstrom TM, Robinson WH (2011) Fishing for biomarkers with antigen mimics. Cell 144:13–15. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.022
Loddenkemper R, Hauer B (2010) Drug-resistant tuberculosis: a worldwide epidemic poses a new challenge. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international 107:10–19. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0010
Lolli F, Mazzanti B, Pazzagli M et al (2005a) The glycopeptide CSF114(Glc) detects serum antibodies in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 167:131–137. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.05.016
Lolli F, Mulinacci B, Carotenuto A et al (2005b) An N-glucosylated peptide detecting disease-specific autoantibodies, biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10273–10278. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503178102
Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN (2005) Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nature Rev Canc 5:845–856. doi:10.1038/nrc1739
Mahler M, Fritzler MJ, Blüthner M (2005) Identification of a SmD3 epitope with a single symmetrical dimethylation of an arginine residue as a specific target of a subpopulation of anti-Sm antibodies. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R19–R29. doi:10.1186/ar1455
Mandell DJ, Kortemme T (2009) Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. Nat Chem Biol 5:797–807. doi:10.1038/nchembio.251
Masignani V, Rappuoli R, Pizza M (2002) Reverse vaccinology: a genome-based approach for vaccine development. Exp Opin Biol Ther 2:895–905. doi:10.1517/14712598.2.8.895
Mazzucco S, Matà S, Vergelli M et al (1999) A synthetic glycopeptide of human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein to detect antibody responses in multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 9:167–172
Moreau V, Granier C, Villard S et al (2006) Discontinuous epitope prediction based on mimotope analysis. Bioinformatics 22:1088–1095. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl012
Moyle PM, Toth I (2008) Self-adjuvanting lipopeptide vaccines. Curr Med Chem 15:506–516
Mulder GE, JaW Kruijtzer, Liskamp RMJ (2012) A combinatorial approach toward smart libraries of discontinuous epitopes of HIV gp120 on a TAC synthetic scaffold. Chem Comm 48:10007–10009. doi:10.1039/c2cc35310e
Nikaido H (2009) Multidrug resistance in bacteria. Annual Rev Biochem 78:119–146. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082907.145923
Nikiforovich GV (2009) Computational molecular modeling in peptide drug design. Int J Pept Prot Res 44:513–531. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1994.tb01140.x
Novotný J, Handschumacher M, Haber E et al (1986) Antigenic determinants in proteins coincide with surface regions accessible to large probes (antibody domains). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:226–230
Ofek G, Guenaga FJ, Schief WR et al (2010) Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17880–17887. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004728107
Papini AM (2005) Simple test for multiple sclerosis. Nat Med 11:13. doi:10.1038/nm0105-13
Papini AM (2009) The use of post-translationally modified peptides for detection of biomarkers of immune-mediated diseases. J Pept Sci 15:621–628. doi:10.1002/psc.1166
Pedersen DS, Abell A (2011) 1,2,3-triazoles in peptidomimetic chemistry. Eur J Org Chem 2011:2399–2411. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100157
Peri C, Gagni P, Combi F et al (2013) Rational epitope design for protein targeting. ACS Chem Biol 8:397–404. doi:10.1021/cb300487u
Peters AM (2000) Antibodies in nuclear medicine. Meth Mol Med 40:179–192
Ponomarenko J, Bui H–H, Li W et al (2008) ElliPro: a new structure-based tool for the prediction of antibody epitopes. BMC Bioinform 9:514. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-514
Purcell AW, Zeng W, Na Mifsud et al (2003) Dissecting the role of peptides in the immune response: theory, practice and the application to vaccine design. J Pept Sci 9:255–281. doi:10.1002/psc.456
Purcell AW, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J (2007) More than one reason to rethink the use of peptides in vaccine design. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:404–414. doi:10.1038/nrd2224
Reddy MM, Wilson R, Wilson J et al (2011) Identification of candidate IgG biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease via combinatorial library screening. Cell 144:132–142. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.054
Renfrew PD, Choi EJ, Bonneau R, Kuhlman B (2012) Incorporation of noncanonical amino acids into rosetta and use in computational protein–peptide interface design. PLoS ONE 7:e32637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032637
Richter F, Blomberg R, Khare SD et al (2012) Computational design of catalytic dyads and oxyanion holes for ester hydrolysis. J Am Chem Soc 134:16197–16206. doi:10.1021/ja3037367
Robinson WH, Steinman L, Utz PJ (2002) Protein and peptide array analysis of autoimmune disease. Biotechniques 28:66–69
Rosenthal KS (2005) Immune peptide enhancement of peptide-based vaccines. Frontiers Biosci 10:478–482
Rudd PM (2001) Glycosylation and the immune system. Science 291:2370–2376. doi:10.1126/science.291.5512.2370
Rudd PM, Wormald MR, Stanfield RL et al (1999) Roles for glycosylation of cell surface receptors involved in cellular immune recognition. J Mol Biol 293:351–366. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3104
Rudd PM, Wormald MR, Ra Dwek (2004) Sugar-mediated ligand-receptor interactions in the immune system. Trends Biotech 22:524–530. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.012
Sadler K, Zeng W, Jackson DC (2002) Synthetic peptide epitope-based polymers: controlling size and determining the efficiency of epitope incorporation. J Pept Res 60:150–158
Sammond DW, Bosch DE, Butterfoss GL et al (2011) Computational design of the sequence and structure of a protein-binding peptide. J Am Chem Soc 133:4190–4192
Scarabelli G, Morra G, Colombo G (2010) Predicting interaction sites from the energetics of isolated proteins: a new approach to epitope mapping. Biophys J 98:1966–1975. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.014
Schott ME, Wells DT, Schlom J, Abrams SI (1996) Comparison of linear and branched peptide forms (MAPs) in the induction of T helper responses to point-mutated ras immunogens. Cell Immun 174:199–209. doi:10.1006/cimm.1996.0310
Schutze MP, Leclerc C, Jolivet M et al (1985) Carrier-induced epitopic suppression, a major issue for future synthetic vaccines. J Immun 135:2319–2322
Sharav T, Wiesmüller K-H, Walden P (2007) Mimotope vaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Vaccine 25:3032–3037
Sheinerman FB, Norel R, Honig B (2000) Electrostatic aspects of protein–protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:153–159
Skwarczynski M, Zaman M, Urbani CN et al (2010) Polyacrylate dendrimer nanoparticles: a self-adjuvanting vaccine delivery system. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:5742–5745. doi:10.1002/anie.201002221
Souroujon MC, Mochly-Rosen D (1998) Peptide modulators of protein–protein interactions in intracellular signaling. Nat Biotech 16:919–924. doi:10.1038/nbt1098-919
Thornton JM, Edwards MS, Taylor WR, Barlow DJ (1986) Location of “continuous” antigenic determinants in the protruding regions of proteins. Eur Mol Biol Organiz J 5:409–413
Timmerman P, Puijk WC, Meloen RH (2007) Functional reconstruction and synthetic mimicry of a conformational epitope using CLIPS technology. J Mol Recog 20:283–299. doi:10.1002/jmr
Timmerman P, Puijk WC, Boshuizen RS et al (2009) Functional reconstruction of structurally complex epitopes using CLIPS TM technology. Open Vaccine J 2:56–67
Tsunoda T (2004) Development for a novel cancer vaccine. Gan to kagaku ryoho Cancer chemotherapy 31:2095–2099
Ulucan O, Eyrisch S, Helms V (2012) Druggability of dynamic protein–protein interfaces. Curr Pharmac Des 18:4599–4606
Uto T, Wang X, Akagi T et al (2009) Improvement of adaptive immunity by antigen-carrying biodegradable nanoparticles. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 379:600–604. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.122
Van Regenmortel MH (2001) Antigenicity and immunogenicity of synthetic peptides. Biol J Intern Association Biol Standardization 29:209–213
Van Regenmortel MHV (2009a) What is a B-cell epitope? Meth Mol Biol 524:3–20
Van Regenmortel MHV (2009b) Synthetic peptide vaccines and the search for neutralization B-cell. Open Vaccine J 2:33–44
Vossenaar ER, Van Venrooij WJ (2004) Anti-CCP antibodies, a highly specific marker for (early) rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Appl Immunol Rev 4:239–262. doi:10.1016/j.cair.2003.11.001
Waldmann TA (1991) Monoclonal antibodies in diagnosis and therapy. Science 252:1657–1662
Wang W (2011) Selection of adjuvants for enhanced vaccine potency. World J Vacc 01:33–78. doi:10.4236/wjv.2011.12007
Westhof E, Altschuh D, Moras D et al (1984) Correlation between segmental mobility and the location of antigenic determinants in proteins. Nature 311:123–126
Wiersinga WJ, Van Der Poll T, White NJ et al (2006) Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:272–282
Wilkinson BL, Day S, Chapman R et al (2012) Synthesis and immunological evaluation of self-assembling and self-adjuvanting tricomponent glycopeptide cancer-vaccine candidates. Chem Eur J 18:16540–16548. doi:10.1002/chem.201202629
Yin H, Slusky JS, Berger BW et al (2007) Computational design of peptides that target transmembrane helices. Science 315:1817–1822. doi:10.1126/science.1136782
Yoshikawa T, Okada N, Oda A et al (2008) Development of amphiphilic gamma-PGA-nanoparticle based tumor vaccine: potential of the nanoparticulate cytosolic protein delivery carrier. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 366:408–413. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.153
Zen A, Micheletti C, Keskin O, Nussinov R (2010) Comparing interfacial dynamics in protein–protein complexes: an elastic network approach. BMC Struct Biol 10:26. doi:10.1186/1472-6807-10-26
Zeng W, Ghosh S, Lau YF et al (2002) Highly immunogenic and totally synthetic lipopeptides as self-adjuvanting immunocontraceptive vaccines. J Immun 169:4905–4912
Zhu X, Ramos TV, Gras-Masse H et al (2004) Lipopeptide epitopes extended by an Nepsilon-palmitoyl-lysine moiety increase uptake and maturation of dendritic cells through a toll-like receptor-2 pathway and trigger a Th1-dependent protective immunity. Eur J Immun 34:3102–3114
Zolnik BS, González-Fernández A, Sadrieh N, Ma Dobrovolskaia (2010) Nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology 151:458–465. doi:10.1210/en.2009-1082
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by CARIPLO “From Genome to Antigen: a Multidisciplinary Approach towards the Development of an Effective Vaccine against Burkholderia pseudomallei, the Etiological Agent of Melioidosis” (contract number 2009-3577); GC also acknowledges funding from AIRC (Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro) through the grant: IG 11775; from Fondazione Cariplo through grant 2011-1800 for the RST call—“Premio fondazione cariplo per la ricerca di frontiera” and from the Italian Ministry of Education and Research through the Flagship (PB05) “InterOmics”.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gori, A., Longhi, R., Peri, C. et al. Peptides for immunological purposes: design, strategies and applications. Amino Acids 45, 257–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1526-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1526-9