Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wurzelkanalaufbereitung mit der 1-Feilen-Technik

Eine Übersicht

Root canal preparation using a single instrument technique

A review

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Stomatologie

Zusammenfassung

Im vorliegenden Übersichtsartikel werden die Vor- und Nachteile der neuen maschinellen Aufbereitungstechnik der Wurzelkanäle nach G. Yared diskutiert. In den letzten 3 Jahren wurden mehrere Studien zur maschinellen Aufbereitung mit alternierendem (reziprokem) Bewegungsablauf und einem einzigen Instrument publiziert. Die Erweiterung und die Formgebung von Wurzelkanälen mit nur einem Nickel-Titan(NiTi)-Instrument (Reciproc®, WaveOne®) in alternierender Rotation werden als sicher und zufriedenstellend bewertet.

Abstract

In this review article the advantages and disadvantages of a novel instrumentation technique for root canal preparation as described by G. Yared will be discussed. In the past 3 years many articles have been published on the use of a single nickel-titanium (NiTi) instrument with alternating (reciprocating) movement for mechanical canal preparation. In comparison to continuous rotation, NiTi instruments (e.g. Reciproc® and WaveOne®) seem to have superior mechanical properties when used in reciprocating motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F (2001) Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 27(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paque F, Peters OA (2011) Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod 37(4):517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters OA, Paque F (2011) Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 37(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiger R, Bruckner M, ElAyouti A, Lost C (2003) Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files. Int Endod J 36(7):483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu MK, Sluis LW van der, Wesselink PR (2003) The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 36(3):218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salzgeber M, Brilliant D (1977) An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod 3(10):394–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hörman N (2012) One-file Endodontics. Junge Zahnarzt 2012/1:13–24

  8. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG (1985) The „Balanced Force“ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 11(5):203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W (1995) Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2: Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 21(10):493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruddle CJ (2012) Endodontic canal preparation: WaveOne single-file-technique. Dent Today 31(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endodontie (2007) Die Fraktur von Wurzelkanalinstrumenten. DZZ 62(8):534–534

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elliott LM, Curtis RV, Pitt Ford TR (1998) Cutting pattern of nickel-titanium files using two preparation techniques. Endod Dent Traumatol 14(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P (1999) Cyclic fatigue of profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. Int Endod J 32(2):115–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M et al (2009) Micro-XRD and temperature-modulated DSC investigation of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. Dent Mater 25(10):1221–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ye J, Gao Y (2012) Metallurgical characterization of M-wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod 38(1):105–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI (2010) Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 36(2):305–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. VDW-Dental (2012) Die Reziprok-Technik. http://www.vdw-dental.com/fileadmin/redaktion/downloads/produkte/reciproc-anwender_a5_rev3.pdf

  18. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endodontie (2005) Die maschinelle Wurzelkanalaufbereitung. DZZ 60(8):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yared G (2008) Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 41(4):339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. You S-Y, Bae K-S, Baek S-H et al (2012) Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved canals. J Endod 36(12):1991–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paque F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G (2011) Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod 37(10):1394–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De-Deus G, Brandao MC, Barion B et al (2010) Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by he single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110(3):390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. You S-Y, Kim H-C, Bae K-S et al (2011) Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography. J Endod 37(9):1296–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi RQ et al (2010) Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals. J Endod 36(11):1897–1900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oh M-J U (2009) Vorgaben zur manuellen Aufbereitung von Wurzelkanalinstrumenten. Dissertation, FU Berlin. http://www.diss.fuberlin.de/diss/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDISS_derivate_000000006194/diss_oh.pdf?hosts=

  26. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E (2012) Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int J Endod 45(5):449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Castello-Escriva R, Alegre-Domingo T et al (2012) In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod 38(11):1521–1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS et al (2012) Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 38(4):505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L et al (2013) Micro-computed tomography of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. J Endod 39(8):1060–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baugh D, Wallace J (2005) The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. J Endod 31(5):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M. Marotti gibt an, dass sie als Referentin bei den Workshops „Reciproc – one file endo“ tätig ist (Interdent Celje, Slowakei, in Kooperation mit VDW Dental, Deutschland) bzw. war (Pluradent, Österreich, in Kooperation mit VDW Dental). Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinische Abteilung für Zahnerhaltungskunde, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde , Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4/6, 8036, Graz, Österreich

    M. Marotti

Authors
  1. M. Marotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Marotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marotti, M. Wurzelkanalaufbereitung mit der 1-Feilen-Technik. Stomatologie 111, 321–328 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-014-0358-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-014-0358-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation