Skip to main content
Log in

Klinische Erfahrungen mit silikatkeramischen Restaurationen

Clinical experience with silicate ceramic restorations

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
Stomatologie

Summary

The demand for esthetic restorations has resulted in an increased use of dental ceramics as a biocompatible and functional sufficient alternative to conventional restorative materials. Silicate ceramic restorations are widely used for veneers, inlays, onlays and crowns in dentistry. Longevity and reasons for failure are reviewed. Additionally, this article addresses the Innsbruck practical guidelines regarding indications and detailed cementation procedure for silicate ceramics.

Zusammenfassung

Der zunehmende Wunsch der Patienten nach ästhetischen Restaurationen hat das Interesse an vollkeramischen Restaurationen als biokompatibel und funktionell zufriedenstellende Alternative zu konventionellen restaurativen Materialien verstärkt. Silikatkeramiken verfügen mit Veneer-, Inlay-, Onlay- und Kronenversorgungen über ein weites Indikationsspektrum. Klinische Langzeitergebnisse und Gründe für Mißerfolge werden besprochen. Desweiteren stellt die Arbeit das Innsbruck Zementierungsprotokoll für die adhäsive Befestigung der Silkatkeramiken vor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Beall GH (1992) Design and Properties of Glass-Ceramics. Annu Rev Mater Sci 22: 91–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H (2012a) Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 25(1): 70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H (2012b) Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 25(1): 79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatz MB (2002) Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 33 (6): 415–426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler-Zemp P, Thomas Völkel T, Fischer K (2011) IPS e.max® Press Wissenschaftliche Dokumentation. Ivoclar Vivadent AG Forschung und Entwicklung Wissenschaftlicher Dienst. FL- Schaan

  • Chang JC, Hart DA, Estey AW, Chan JT (2003) Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 90(1): 18–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad HJ, Seong W-J, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 98(5): 389–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Bona A, Kelly JR (2008) The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 139: Suppl (8S–13S)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fradeani M, Redemagni M (2002) An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 33(7): 503–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn R, Löst C (1992) Konventionelle Dentalporzellane versus bruchzähe Hochleistungskeramiken. Deutsche Zahnärztl Z 47(10): 659–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda R (1993) Kleben und Klebetechniken, Teil 2: Adhäsiv-Systeme für Zahntechnik und -medizin. Dent Lab 40: 615–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JR (2008) Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc 139: Suppl 4S–7S

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JR, Benetti P (2011) Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 56: Suppl 1: 84–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Kohal RJ, Mehl A, Pospiech P, Frankenberger R, Reiss B, Wiedhahn K, Kunzelmann KH (2010). Dentalkeramiken-Struktur und Einsatzzweck.Vollkeramik auf einen Blick. AGKeramik. Ettlingen

  • Lindemann W (2000) Dentalkeramiken-mineralogisch betrachtet. ZMK - Zahnheilkunde, Management & Kultur 16 (5): 280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29,(5): 481–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan PW (1979) Glass-ceramics. London, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B (2004) A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 6,(1): 65–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pospiech P, Ed. (2004) Keramik-Vollkeramik. Ein Kompendium für die keramikgerechte Anwendung volkeramischer Systeme in der Zahnmedizin. 3 M ESPE

  • Schüller KH, Hennicke HW (1985) Zur Systematik der keramischen Werkstoffe. CFI. Ceramic forum international, Göller 62: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Stookey SD (1959) Catalyzed Crystallization of Glass in Theory and Practice. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 51(7): 805–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L (2010) A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 26(9): 929–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Stephanie Beier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beier, U., Kapferer, I., Matkulcik, M. et al. Klinische Erfahrungen mit silikatkeramischen Restaurationen. Stomatologie 109, 19–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-012-0132-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-012-0132-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation