Skip to main content
Log in

Protoplast-to-plant regeneration of American elm (Ulmus americana)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes a protocol for regeneration of plants from cell suspension-derived protoplasts of American elm (Ulmus americana). Efficient protoplast isolation was achieved from a two-phase culture system through the incorporation of 100 μM 2-aminoindan-2-phosphonic acid, with a yield of approximately 2 × 106 protoplasts/ml packed cell volume. Isolated protoplasts failed to survive in liquid or alginate bead culture systems but initiated and continued to divide when embedded in low melting point agarose beads. Protoplast-derived callus proliferated and differentiated into shoot buds in response to 10 or 20 μM thidiazuron. Differentiated buds elongated and continued to proliferate on elm shoot medium supplemented with 3.0 μM GA3. The protoplast-derived shoots rooted and acclimatized to greenhouse conditions and continued to grow. This system provides the first protoplast-to-plant regeneration system for American elm and provides a framework for the development of protoplast fusion or genome editing technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Ager AA, Guries RP (1982) Barriers to interspecific hybridization in Ulmus americana. Euphytica 31:909–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appert C, Zon J, Amrhein N (2003) Kinetic analysis of the inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase by 2-aminoindan-2-phosphonic acid and other phenylalanine analogues. Phytochemistry 62:415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butt AD (1985) A general method for the high-yield isolation of mesophyll protoplasts from deciduous tree species. Plant Sci 42:55–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conde P, Santos C (2006) An efficient protocol for Ulmus minor mill. Protoplast isolation and culture in agarose droplets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 86:359–366. doi:10.1007/s11240-006-9122-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cvikrová M, Malá J, Hrubcová M et al (2003) Effect of inhibition of biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids on sessile oak somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Anthony P, Power JB, Lowe KC (2005) Plant protoplasts: status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 23:131–71. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.09.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorion N, Godin B, Bigot C (1983) Isolation and culture of leaf protoplasts from Ulmus sp.: preliminary report. Protoplasts 1983. Basel:Birkhäuser Verlag, pp 8–9

  • Dorion N, Jouira HB, Danthu P, Bigot C (1994) Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Ulmus species (elms). Plant Protoplasts Genet. Eng. V. Berlin: Springer, pp 172–190

  • Driver JA, Kuniyuki A (1984) In vitro propagation of paradox walnut rootstock. Hortic Sci 19:507–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Frearson EM, Power JB, Cocking EC (1973) The isolation, culture and regeneration of Petunia leaf protoplasts. Dev Biol 33:130–137. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(73)90169-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George M, Tripepi R (1994) Cytokinins, donor plants and time in culture affect shoot regenerative capacity of American elm leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39:27–36. doi:10.1007/BF00037588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AMP, Saxena PK (2013) Inhibition of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L.: a novel approach to reduce oxidative browning in plant tissue culture. PLoS One 8:e76802

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MP, Yi Z, Murch SJ, Saxena PK (2007) Thidiazuron-induced regeneration of Echinacea purpurea L.: micropropagation in solid and liquid culture systems. Plant Cell Rep 26:13–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AMP, Chattopadhyay A, Shukla M, Saxena PK (2012) Inhibition of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis increases cell wall digestibility, protoplast isolation, and facilitates sustained cell division in American elm (Ulmus americana). BMC Plant Biol 12:75

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AMP, Shukla MR, Chattopadhyay A et al (2013) Investigating the roles of phenylpropanoids in the growth and development of Zea mays L. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49:765–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126:105–110. doi:10.1007/BF00380613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klejdus B, Kováčik J, Babula P (2013) PAL inhibitor evokes different responses in two Hypericum species. Plant Physiol Biochem 63:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.11.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korkina LG (2007) Phenylpropanoids as naturally occurring antioxidants: from plant defense to human health. Cell Mol Biol 53:15–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lange DD, Karnosky DF (1981) Techniques for high-frequency isolation of elm protoplasts. In Proceedings of the Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Burlington: VT, pp 213–222

  • Li J-F, Norville JE, Aach J et al (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 31:688–691

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lineberger RD, Sticklen MB, Pijut PM et al (1990) Use of protoplast, cell, and shoot tip culture in an elm germplasm improvement program. Acta Hortic 280:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu C-Y (1993) The use of thidiazuron in tissue culture. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 29:92–96. doi:10.1007/BF02632259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nybakken L, Keski-Saari S, Falck MA, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2007) Restoration of secondary metabolism in birch seedlings relieved from PAL-inhibitor. Trees-Struct Funct 21:273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh MK, Westfall RD, Karnosky DF (1980) Protoplast isolation from Ulmus americana L. pollen mother cells, tetrads, and microspores. Can J For Res 10:284–289. doi:10.1139/x80-048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh K, Karnosky DF, Westfall RD (1981) Protoplast isolation and fusion in three Ulmus species. Can J Bot 59:1436–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J et al (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:686–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla MR, Jones AMP, Sullivan JA et al (2012) In vitro conservation of American elm (Ulmus americana): potential role of auxin metabolism in sustained plant proliferation. Can J For Res 42:686–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen MB, Daniel Lineberger R, Domir SC (1985) Isolation and culture of protoplasts of Ulmus x “Homestead.”. Plant Sci 41:117–120. doi:10.1016/0168-9452(85)90112-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend AM, Douglass LW (2004) Evaluation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. J Arboric 179–184

  • Townsend AM, Bentz SE, Douglass LW (2005) Evaluation of 19 American elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. J Environ Hortic 23:21–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Gosling Foundation and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Saxena.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Alexander Schulz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, A.M.P., Shukla, M.R., Biswas, G.C.G. et al. Protoplast-to-plant regeneration of American elm (Ulmus americana). Protoplasma 252, 925–931 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0724-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0724-y

Keywords

Navigation