Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive surgical procedure which involves injecting polymethylmethacrylate into the compressed vertebral body. At present the indications include the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures, vertebral myeloma, and metastases. The value of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture has been discussed comprehensively. The surgical operation for burst fractures without neurological deficit remains controversial. Some authors have asserted that vertebroplasty is contraindicated in patients with burst fracture. However, we performed the procedure, after considering the patents general condition, to reduce surgical risks and the duration of immobilisation. The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes, kyphosis correction, wedge angle, and height restoration of thoraco-lumbar osteoporotic burst fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five patients with osteoporotic burst fracture were treated with postural reduction followed by vertebroplasty. We measured the kyphosis, wedge angle, spinal canal compromise and the height of the fractured vertebral body initially, after postural reduction, and after vertebroplasty.

Findings

The average height of the collapsed vertebral bodies was 24.8% of the original height. Average kyphosis angle was 19.4° and average wedge angle was 19.8° at first. Mean canal encroachment was initially 25.1%. Kyphosis angle, wedge angle, and anterior, middle, and posterior height improved significantly after the procedure. The mean amelioration of the spinal canal encroachment after vertebroplasty was 23.3%. The average increase in anterior vertebral body height was 7.5 mm, central was 5.8 mm, and posterior was 0.9 mm. The mean reduction in kyphosis angle was 6.8° and the mean reduction in wedge angle was 9.7°.

Conclusion

Although vertebroplasty has been considered as contraindicated in thoraco-lumbar burst fractures, we successfully used the procedure as a safe treatment in patients with osteoporotic burst fracture without neurologic deficit. This method could eliminate the need for and risks of major spinal surgery. We would like to offer it as a relatively safe and effective methods of management in thoraco-lumbar burst fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Been HD, Bouma GJ (1999) Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson DR, Burkus JK, Montesano PX, Sutherland TB, McLain RF (1992) Unstable thoraco-lumbar and lumbar burst fractures treated with the AO fixateur interne. J Spinal Disord 5:335–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradford DS, McBride GG (1987) Surgical management of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits. Clin Orthop Relat Res(218):201–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ (1993) Nonoperative management of stable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracing. Spine 18:971–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen YJ, Tan TS, Chen WH, Chen CC, Lee TS (2006) Intradural cement leakage: a devastatingly rare complication of vertebroplasty. Spine 31:E379–E382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin DK, Kim YS, Cho YE, Shin JJ (2006) Efficacy of postural reduction in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures followed by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Neurosurgery 58:695–700 (discussion 695–700)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Clarisse J (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200:525–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, Whitehill R, Wang GJ, Szabo TA, Hansen CA, Shaffrey ME, Chan DP (1995) Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 83:977–983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, Matta L (1984) Acute thoraco-lumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(189):142–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, Le Gars D (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 36:533–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Devlin VJ (2003) Spine secrets. Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dickson JH, Harrington PR, Erwin WD (1978) Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:799–805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimar JR 2nd, Wilde PH, Glassman SD, Puno RM, Johnson JR (1996) Thoraco-lumbar burst fractures treated with combined anterior and posterior surgery. Am J Orthop 25:159–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farcy JP, Weidenbaum M, Glassman SD (1990) Sagittal index in management of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. Spine 15:958–965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frymoyer JW, Wiesel SW (2004) The adult and pediatric spine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D (1987) [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM, Marks P, Martin C, Fazl M, Schwartz M, Jacobs RR (1988) The neurological outcome following surgery for spinal fractures. Spine 13:641–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P (2000) Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1410–1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrington KD (2001) Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1070–1073

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heini PF, Walchli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. A prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Eur Spine J 9:445–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hiwatashi A, Moritani T, Numaguchi Y, Westesson PL (2003) Increase in vertebral body height after vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:185–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs RR, Asher MA, Snider RK (1980) Thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. A comparative study of recumbent and operative treatment in 100 patients. Spine 5:463–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobs RR, Casey MP (1984) Surgical management of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. General principles and controversial considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res(189):22–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1897–1904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kramer DL, Rodgers WB, Mansfield FL (1995) Transpedicular instrumentation and short-segment fusion of thoraco-lumbar fractures: a prospective study using a single instrumentation system. J Orthop Trauma 9:499–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, Zeidman SM, Chang AS, Klemme WR (2001) Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 26:61–65 (discussion 66)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Louis R (1985) Spinal stability as defined by the three-column spine concept. Anat Clin 7:33–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, Barr MS, Jensen ME, Deramond H (2001) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:373–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mathis JM, Petri M, Naff N (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment of steroid-induced osteoporotic compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum 41:171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoraco-lumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:461–473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T (2003) The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR (1993) Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoraco-lumbar fractures. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:162–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK (1993) Thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine 18:955–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oner FC, Verlaan JJ, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2006) Cement augmentation techniques in traumatic thoraco-lumbar spine fractures. Spine 31:S89–S95 (discussion S104)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Payer M (2006) Unstable burst fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction: treatment by posterior bisegmental correction/fixation and staged anterior corpectomy and titanium cage implantation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:299–306 (discussion 306)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schnee CL, Ansell LV (1997) Selection criteria and outcome of operative approaches for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures with and without neurological deficit. J Neurosurg 86:48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Seybold EA, Sweeney CA, Fredrickson BE, Warhold LG, Bernini PM (1999) Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3–L5. Spine 24:2154–2161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS (2001) Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 26:1038–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shen WJ, Shen YS (1999) Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 24:412–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Teng MM, Cheng H, Ho DM, Chang CY (2006) Intraspinal leakage of bone cement after vertebroplasty: a report of 3 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:224–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Teng MM, Wei CJ, Wei LC, Luo CB, Lirng JF, Chang FC, Liu CL, Chang CY (2003) Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1893–1900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP (2003) Functional and radiographic outcome of thoraco-lumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine 28:2459–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Trumm CG, Jakobs TF, Zech CJ, Weber C, Reiser MF, Hoffmann RT (2006) [Vertebroplasty in the treatment of back pain]. Radiologe 46:495–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Truumees E, Hilibrand A, Vaccaro AR (2004) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Spine J 4:218–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsai TT, Chen WJ, Lai PL, Chen LH, Niu CC, Fu TS, Wong CB (2003) Polymethylmethacrylate cement dislodgment following percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report. Spine 28:E457–E460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, Rose M, Sola-Martinez T, Enkaoua E (1996) Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 199:241–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilcox RK, Allen DJ, Hall RM, Limb D, Barton DC, Dickson RA (2004) A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach. Eur Spine J 13:481–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Winking M, Stahl JP, Oertel M, Schnettler R, Boker DK (2004) Treatment of pain from osteoporotic vertebral collapse by percutaneous PMMA vertebroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:469–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Winn HR, Youmans JR (2004) Youmans neurological surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Sul Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, J.J., Chin, D.K. & Yoon, Y.S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151, 141–148 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0189-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0189-5

Keywords

Navigation