Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of some methods for bounding connected and disconnected solution sets of interval linear systems

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Finding bounding sets to solutions to systems of algebraic equations with uncertainties in the coefficients, as well as rapidly but rigorously locating all solutions to nonlinear systems or global optimization problems, involves bounding the solution sets to systems of equations with wide interval coefficients. In many cases, singular systems are admitted within the intervals of uncertainty of the coefficients, leading to unbounded solution sets with more than one disconnected component. This, combined with the fact that computing exact bounds on the solution set is NP-hard, limits the range of techniques available for bounding the solution sets for such systems. However, the componentwise nature and other properties make the interval Gauss–Seidel method suited to computing meaningful bounds in a predictable amount of computing time. For this reason, we focus on the interval Gauss–Seidel method. In particular, we study and compare various preconditioning techniques we have developed over the years but not fully investigated, comparing the results. Based on a study of the preconditioners in detail on some simple, specially–designed small systems, we propose two heuristic algorithms, then study the behavior of the preconditioners on some larger, randomly generated systems, as well as a small selection of systems from the Matrix Market collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alefeld, G., Kreinovich, V., Mayer, G.: The shape of the symmetric solution set. In: Kearfott, R. B. and Kreinovich, V. (eds.) Applications of interval computations: Papers presented at an international workshop in El Paso, TX, February 23–25, 1995. Applied Optimization, vol. 3, Norwell, MA, pp. 61–80. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)

  2. Alefeld G., Kreinovich V. and Mayer G. (2003). On the solution sets of particular classes of linear interval systems. J Comput Appl Math 152: 1–15

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Boisvert R.F., Pozo R., Remington K., Barrett R. and Dongarra J.J. (1997). The Matrix Market: a web resource for test matrix collections. In: Boisvert, R.F. (eds) Quality of numerical software, assessment and enhancement, pp 125–137. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gau, C.-Y., Stadtherr, M. A.: Reliable high-performance computing strategies for chemical process modelling. (1999) http://www.nd.edu/~markst/dallas99/slides213c.pdf

  5. Hu, C.-Y.: Splitting preconditioners for the interval Newton method. Ph.D thesis, University of Southwestern Louisiana (1990)

  6. Hu, C.-Y., Kearfott, R.B.: A pivoting scheme for the interval Gauss–Seidel method: Numerical experiments. In: Approximation, optimization and computing: Theory and applications, pp. 97–100. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)

  7. Kearfott R.B. (1990). Preconditioners for the interval Gauss–Seidel method. SIAM J Numer Anal 27: 804–822

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kearfott R.B. (1996). Rigorous global search: continuous problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kearfott, R. B., Hongthong, S.: On preconditioners and splitting in the interval Gauss–Seidel method. Tech. report, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (2005) http://interval.louisiana.edu/preprints/2005_new_S_preconditioner.as_submitted.pdf

  10. Kreinovich V., Lakeyev A., Rohn J. and Kahl P. (1998). Computational complexity and feasibility of data processing and interval computations. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Leyffer S., Lopez-Calva G. and Nocedal J. (2006). Interior methods for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. SIAM J Optim 17: 52–77

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Muhanna R.L. and Mullen R.L. (2001). Uncertainty in mechanics problems. J Eng Mech 127: 557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neumaier A. (1990). Interval methods for systems of equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumaier A. and Pownuk A. (2007). Linear systems with large uncertainties, with applications to truss structures. Reliable Comput 13: 149–172

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Novoa, M.: Theory of preconditioners for the interval Gauss-Seidel method and existence/uniqueness theory with interval newton methods. Tech. report, Deptartment of Mathematics, University of Southwestern Louisiana (1993)

  16. Oettli W. (1965). On the solution set of a linear system with inaccurate coefficients. SIAM J Numer Anal 2: 115–118

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Oettli W. and Prager W. (1964). Compatibility of approximate solution of linear equations with given error bounds for coefficients and right-hand sides. Numer Math 6: 405–409

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pryce J.D. and Corliss G.F. (2006). Interval arithmetic with containment sets. Computing 78: 251–276

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Rohn J.: Solving systems of linear interval equations. In: Reliability in computing, perspectives in computing, pp. 171–182 Academic Press, New York (1988)

  20. Rump, S. M.: INTLAB – INTerval LABoratory (INTLAB home page) (2005) http://www.ti3.tu-harburg.de/~rump/intlab/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Baker Kearfott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearfott, R.B. A comparison of some methods for bounding connected and disconnected solution sets of interval linear systems. Computing 82, 77–102 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-008-0258-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-008-0258-2

AMS Subject Classifications

Keywords

Navigation