Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Specimen Size on Strength and Other Properties in Laboratory Testing of Rock and Rock-Like Cementitious Brittle Materials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of specimen size on the measured unconfined compressive strength and other mechanical properties has been studied by numerous researchers in the past, although much of this work has been based on specimens of non-standard dimensions and shapes, and over a limited size range. A review of the published literature was completed concentrating on the presentation of research pertaining to right cylindrical specimens with height:diameter ratios of 2:1. Additionally, new data has been presented considering high strength (70 MPa) cement mortar specimens of various diameters ranging from 63 to 300 mm which were tested to failure. Currently, several models exist in the published literature that seek to predict the strength–size relationship in rock or cementitious materials. Modelling the reviewed datasets, statistical analysis was used to help establish which of these models best represents the empirical evidence. The findings presented here suggest that over the range of specimen sizes explored, the MFSL (Carpinteri et al. in Mater Struct 28:311–317, 1995) model most closely predicts the strength–size relationship in rock and cementitious materials, and that a majority of the empirical evidence supports an asymptotic value in strength at large specimen diameters. Furthermore, the MFSL relationship is not only able to model monotonically decreasing strength–size relationships but is also equally applicable to monotonically increasing relationships, which although shown to be rare do for example exist in rocks with fractal distributions of hard particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (2001) Standard practices for preparing rock core specimens and determining dimensional and shape tolerances, Designation: D 4543–01. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2004) Standard test method for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures, Designation: D 7012-04. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils, Designation: D422-63. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Bazant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete rock metal. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 110:518–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanks RF, Mcnamara CC (1935) Mass concrete tests in large cylinders. J Am Concr Inst 31:280–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace WF (1981) The effect of size on mechanical properties of rock. Geophys Res Lett 8:651–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Ferro G (1995) Size effects on nominal tensile strength of concrete structures: multifractality of material ligaments and dimensional transition from order to disorder. Mater Struct 28:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinteri A, Ferro G, Monetto I (1999) Scale effects in uniaxially compressed concrete specimens. Mag Concr Res 51:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha AP (1990) Scale effects in rock mass. In: Cunha AP (ed) Proceeding of International Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Balkema

  • Hawkins AB (1998) Aspects of rock strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2000) Rock engineering course notes by Evert Hoek. http://www.rocscience.com/education/hoeks_corner

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground Excavations in Rock. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins JR, Horino FG (1969) Influence of spherical head size and specimen diameters on the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington

  • Jackson R, Lau JSO (1990) The effect of specimen size on the laboratory mechanical properties of Lac du Bonnet grey gragranite. In: Cunha P (ed) Scale effects in rock masses. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1961) The influence of the dimensions of specimens on the fracture strength of rocks. Bull Earthq Res Inst 40:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Natau O, Frolich BO, Mutschler TO (1983) Recent development of the large scale triaxial test. In: ISRM Congress, Melbourne, pp A65–A74

  • Nishimatsu Y, Yamaguchi U, Motosugi K, Morita M (1969) The size effect and experimental error of the strength of rocks. J Min Mater Process Inst Jpn 18:1019–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Pells PJN (2004) On the absence of size effects for substance strength of Hawkesbury Sandstone. Aust Geomech 39:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt HR, Black AD, Brown WS, Brace WF (1972) The effect of specimen size on the mechanical properties of unjointed diorite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey CCM-VD, Galindo MP, Velarde MAA (2001) Effects of using mean scores in regression models: an example from environmental psychology. Qual Quant 35:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons IF (1970) The effect of size and shape of specimen upon the unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized materials. Mag Concr Res 22:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuro K, Plinninger RJ, Zah S, Schutz S (2001) Scale effects in rock strength properties. Part1: Unconfined compressive test and Brazilian test. In: Rock mechanics—a challenge for society, June 3-7 2001. ISRM, Espoo, pp 169–174

  • Weibull W (1951) A statistical function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuki N, Aoto S, Yoshinaka R, Yoshihiro O, Terada M (1995) The scale and creep effect on the strength of welded tuff. In: Yoshinaka R, Kikuchi K (eds) International Workshop on Rock Foundation. Balkema, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their thanks and appreciation to the undergraduate student Sajmir Bella for his assistance with the laboratory work associated with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Darlington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darlington, W.J., Ranjith, P.G. & Choi, S.K. The Effect of Specimen Size on Strength and Other Properties in Laboratory Testing of Rock and Rock-Like Cementitious Brittle Materials. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44, 513–529 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0161-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0161-6

Keywords

Navigation