Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive video-assisted versus conventional open thyroidectomy: a systematic review of available data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is now emerging as a novel and less invasive procedure for thyroid diseases. This study conducted a systematic review of the available data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new technique over conventional procedure.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials comparing the MIVAT with open thyroidectomy were selected and meta-analyzed.

Results

Nine RCTs involving 730 patients were included and all were restricted to patients with a thyroid nodule no larger than 4 cm and surgery did not involve lymph node dissection. Both procedures were of similar efficacy in nodule resection. Open surgery had a 1.6 times higher rate of postoperative complications than the novel technique, with no significant difference (P = 0.08), especially in transient recurrent nerve palsy (OR = 0.93, P = 0.87). Although longer operative time was required for MIVAT (MD = 15.0 min, P < 0.00001), patients experienced less postoperative pain, especially in the early postoperative period (MD = −11.52, P = 0.0003). There was also a shorter incision length (MD = −2.36 cm, P < 0.00001), better cosmetic results and greater patient satisfaction in the novel technique group (WD = 2.59; P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

MIVAT is a feasible, practical, and safe alternative with better cosmetic benefits, and it can be performed with an ease of manipulation that is similar to that of conventional neck surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MIVAT:

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy

References

  1. Huscher CS, Recher A, Napolitano G, Chiodini S. Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeung GH. Endoscopic surgery of the neck: a new frontier. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Rubino F, Boscherini M, Perilli W. Minimally invasive, totally gasless video-assisted thyroid lobectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:342–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimazu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY, Kitamura Y, Kitagawa W, Akasu H. Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C. Minimally invasive surgery for small thyroid nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22:849–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Timon C, Miller IS. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and technique. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1046–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Minuto M, Barellini L. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C. Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22:849–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferzli GS, Sayad P, Abdo Z, Cacchione RN. Minimally invasive, nonendoscopic thyroid surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:665–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rafferty M, Miller I, Timon C. Minimal incision for open thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:295–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruggieri M, Zullino A, Straniero A, Maiuolo A, Fumarola A, Vietri F, D’Armiento M. Is minimally invasive surgery appropriate for small differentiated thyroid carcinomas? Surg Today. 2010;40:418–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos GC, Neuhauser M, Musholt TJ, Karaliotas C, Lang H. Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence-based information? Thyroid. 2008;7:721–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao-dong C, Bing P, Ri-xiang G, Li W, Bo L, Chun-lin L. Endoscopic thyroidectomy: an evidence-based research on feasibility, safety and clinical effectiveness. Chin Med J. 2008;121(20):2088–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Minor KS, Turina M, Galandiuk S. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist. Br J Surg. 2000;93:1315–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G. Comparison between minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 2001;130:1039–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, Crea CD, Alesina PF, et al. Video-assisted vs. conventional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2002;137:301–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chao TC, Lin JD, Chen MF. Video-assisted open thyroid lobectomy through a small incision. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, Lulli P, Rossi ED, Fadda G, Bellantone R. Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery. Head Neck. 2005;27:58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hegazy MAF, Khater AA, Setit AE, Amin MA, Kotb SZ, ElShafei MA, et al. Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 2007;31:1743–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gal I, Solymosi T, Szabo Z, Balint A, Bolgar G. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2445–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alesina PF, Rolfs T, Rühland K, Brunkhorst V, Groeben H, Walz MK. Evaluation of postoperative pain after minimally invasive video-assisted and conventional thyroidectomy: results of a prospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:845–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El-labban GM. Comparison of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Open Access Surg. 2010;3:17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dionigi G, Boni L, Rovera F, Rausei S, Dionigi R. Wound morbidity in mini-invasive thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:62–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bliss RD, Gauger FG, Delbridge LW. Surgeon’s approach to the thyroid gland: surgical anatomy and the importance of technique. World J Surg. 2000;24:891–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bayat A, McGrouther A, Ferguson J. Skin scarring. BMJ. 2003;326:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. John L, Frank K, Chris M. Visual analogue scale (VAS): a method of scoring pain. Br J Aneth. 2000;80:154–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Burguera B, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: prevalence, diagnosis, significance, and management. Endocrinol Metab. 2000;14:559–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mortensen IC, Woolner LB, Bennett WA. Gross and microscopic findings in clinically normal thyroid glands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1955;15:1270–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multiinstitutional experience. World J Surg. 2002;26:972–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner HE, Seiler Ch. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg. 1994;81:226–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C. Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 1999;126:1117–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors obtained any financial support of any organizations or any companies regarding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingqing Xu.

Additional information

Dr. Liu and Dr. Song contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Song, T. & Xu, M. Minimally invasive video-assisted versus conventional open thyroidectomy: a systematic review of available data. Surg Today 42, 848–856 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0130-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0130-z

Keywords

Navigation