Skip to main content
Log in

Does modern space suit reduce intraoperative contamination in total joint replacement? An experimental study

  • Original Article • ARTHROPLASTY - INFECTION
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a potential risk of intraoperative contamination associated with clothing systems and surgeon’s motion in total joint replacement.

Methods

The airborne particle concentrations at different locations around a single operating surgeon wearing standard surgical gown (SG) or modern “space suit” (SS) were compared. The particles in the size of ≥0.5 μm (roughly corresponding to a mean diameter of squamous epithelial cells) were counted at the following three locations: (1) ≈10 cm inferior to the wrist; (2) ≈10 cm posterior to the feet; and (3) near the chest (operative field) under condition either with or without the surgeon’s motion (stepping in place at ~1 Hz).

Results

The difference in the surgical clothing systems did not significantly affect the mean particle counts detected near the wrist and chest (p = 0.307 and 0.155, respectively). However, the particle count near the feet was 154 times higher in SS than SG (4630 ± 2795 vs. 30 ± 23 N/F3, p = 0.023). The simple stepping of the surgeon with SS increased contaminants near the chest 31 times as compared to the condition without motion (1053 ± 709 vs. 34 ± 31 N/F3, p = 0.0032). Although the particle count was less affected by the motion in SG than SS, contaminants near the chest increased ten times after the stepping in the use of SG (p = 0.032).

Conclusion

The present results suggest that the intraoperative motion of a surgeon may considerably increase airborne particle/bacterial concentration in the operative field. This can be a much higher likelihood in SS rather than SG because of air blow-off from the incorporated cooling fan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perl TM, Cullen JJ, Wenzel RP, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, Sheppard D, Twombley J, French PP, Herwaldt LA (2002) Intranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 346:1871–1877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skråmm I, Moen AEF, Arøen A, Bukholm G (2014) Surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery demonstrate clones similar to those in orthopaedic staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:882–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charnley J (1964) A clean-air operating enclosure. Br J Surg 51:195–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnley J (1972) Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop Relat Res 87:167–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lidwell O, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D (1982) Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomized study. Br Med J 285:10–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh VK, Kalairajah Y (2009) Splash in elective primary knee and hip replacement: are we adequately protected? J Bone Jt Surg Br 91:1074–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C, Wyatt MC (2011) Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement? The ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:85–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young SW, Chisholm C, Zhu M (2014) Intraoperative contamination and space suits: a potential mechanism. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:409–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosden PE, MacGowan AP, Bannister GC (1998) Importance of air quality and related factors in the prevention of infection in orthopaedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect 39:173–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ (2011) Update recommendations for control of SSI. Ann Surg 253:1082–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasquarella C, Pitzurra O, Herren T, Poletti L, Savino A (2003) Lack of influence of body exhaust gowns on aerobic bacterial surface counts in a mixed-ventilation operating theatre. A study of 62 hip arthroplasties. J Hosp Infect 54:2–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bohn WW, McKinsey DS, Dykstra M, Koppe S (1996) The effect of a portable HEPA-filtered body exhaust system on airborne microbial contamination in a conventional operating room. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17:419–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw JA, Bordner MA, Hamory BH (1996) Efficacy of the Steri-Shield filtered exhaust helmet in limiting bacterial counts in the operating room during total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11:469–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blomgren G, Hambraeus A, Malmborg AS (1983) The influence of the total body exhaust suit on air and wound contamination in elective hip-operation. J Hosp Infect 4:257–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGovern PD, Albrecht M, Khan SK, Muller SD, Reed MR (2013) The influence of surgical hoods and togas on airborne particle concentration at the surgical site: an experimental study. J Orthop Sci 18:1027–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Namba RS, Inacio MCS, Paxton EW (2013) Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:775–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scaltriti S, Cencetti S, Rovesti S, Marchesi I, Bargellini A, Borella P (2007) Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect 66(4):320–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayliffe GA (1991) Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis 13:800–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Nakajima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors, and all the experimental procedures were preliminary approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of our institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakajima, D., Tateiwa, T., Masaoka, T. et al. Does modern space suit reduce intraoperative contamination in total joint replacement? An experimental study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 1139–1143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1874-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1874-8

Keywords

Navigation