References
Shao ZX, Fang X, Lv QB, Hu ZC, Shao SY, Hu YB et al (2018) Comparison of combined anterior–posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(9):2213–2222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5702-1
Keeler KA, Lenke LG, Good CR, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Luhmann SJ (2010) Spinal fusion for spastic neuromuscular scoliosis: is anterior releasing necessary when intraoperative halo-femoral traction is used? Spine 35:E427–E433. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d9527e
Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D, Boutron I (2017) Chapter 10: addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.2.0. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 11 Nov 2018
Çeçen GS, Gülabi D, Güçlü B, Çeçen DA, Oltulu İ (2016) Comparison of pedicle screw fixation and hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(3):351–355. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Fei Jia and Jianmin Sun declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, F., Sun, J. Letter to the Editor concerning “Comparison of combined anterior–posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Shao ZX, et al. [Eur Spine J; (2018) 27(9): 2213–2222]. Eur Spine J 28, 883–884 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05895-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05895-5