Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the relationship between radiological, clinical and perceived shoulder balance (ShB) in a sample of non-operated, moderate, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients.

Methods

80 patients (85 % women) with a mean age of 20.3 years (SD 8.6, 12–40 years) were included. Mean Cobb angle was 45.9° (SD 12.9, 25.1°–77.2°). All patients had full spine X-ray and a digital photography from the front. To determine clinical ShB, shoulder height angle (SHA) and axilla height angle (AHA) were measured on clinical photographs. Radiological ShB was assessed with the clavicle–rib intersection angle and T1-tilt. Patients also completed different patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments: SRS-22, TAPS and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ). SAQ included two questions concerning the shoulder area (SAQ-6 = perception and SAQ-13 = expectation) which were used to assess perceived ShB. Patients were divided into two groups: balanced (SHA <3.0°), and imbalanced (SHA ≥3.0°) according to minimal detectable change of SHA. The correlations between variables and mean differences between the two groups were analyzed.

Results

No statistically significant correlations were found between clinical (SHA and AHA) and perceived ShB (SAQ-6), or with PRO scores. 62.5 % of patients were in the “Balanced” group. 46.6 % (14/30) of patients in the clinically imbalanced group (≥3.0°) perceive themselves as totally balanced (score 1 and 2 in SAQ-6), while 10 % (5/50) of patients in the balanced group (SHA <3.0°) perceive themselves as totally imbalanced (score 4 and 5 in SAQ-13). No differences were found between both groups in terms of radiological and perceived ShB, or in PRO scores.

Conclusion

We have not found a significant correlation between clinical/radiological ShB and perceived ShB in non-operated IS patients. It seems that ShB is not a key factor in patient trunk deformity perception. In addition, patient expectations regarding improvement with treatment are not directly related to actual clinical imbalance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ, Durdle NG (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:222–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, Won DS, Sweet FA, Blanke KM, Bridwell KH (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus non-fusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:2013–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, Webb JK (2002) Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine 27:1543–1550 (discussion 1551–1552)

  4. Hong JY, Suh SW, Yang JH, Park SY, Han JH (2013) Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison of the 4 available methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1684–E1690. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a18486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, Griffin JW, Reddi V, Novicoff W, Shilt J, Bersusky E, Defino H, Ouellet J, Arlet V (2011) Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? Eur Spine J 20:1039–1047. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1808-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. X-s Qiu, W-w Ma, W-g Li, Wang B, Yu Y, Z-z Zhu, B-p Qian, Zhu F, Sun X, Ng BKW, Cheng JCY, Qiu Y (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine J 18:45–51. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0833-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ono T, Bastrom TP, Newton PO (2012) Defining 2 components of shoulder imbalance: clavicle tilt and trapezial prominence. Spine 37:E1511–E1516. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826e2bbb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matamalas A, Bago J, D’Agata E, Pellise F (2014) Reliability and validity study of measurements on digital photography to evaluate shoulder balance in idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 9:23. doi:10.1186/s13013-014-0023-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Bridwell KH, Diab M, Dormans JP, Drummond DS, Emans JB, Johnston CE 2nd, Lenke LG, McCarthy RE, Newton PO, Richards BS, Sucato DJ (2007) The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32:2719–2722. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Polly DW, Sucato DJ, Parent S, Roy-Beaudry M, Hopkins J, McClung A, Bratcher KR, Diamond BE (2011) Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing. Spine 36:E1240–E1244. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318204f987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matamalas A, Bago J, D’Agata E, Pellise F (2014) Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:81. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bagó J, Carrera L, March B, Villanueva C (1996) Four radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 5:31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJS, Izquierdo E (2004) The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 29:1676–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bago J, Sanchez-Raya J, Perez-Grueso FJS, Climent JM (2010) The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 25;5:6. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B (2003) Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28:74–78. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000047636.95839.f5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaton DE (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3192–3199

  18. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181

  19. Iwahara T, Imai M, Atsuta Y (1998) Quantification of cosmesis for patients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:12–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JC (1993) Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 18:909–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, Fitoussi F, Presedo A, Souchet P, Pennecot GF, Mazda K (2008) How to determine the upper level of instrumentation in Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 132 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 28:733–739. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e318185a36b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smyrnis PN, Sekouris N, Papadopoulos G (2009) Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:522–530. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0902-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bridwell KH, Shufflebarger HL, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Betz RR, Bassett GS (2000) Parents’ and patients’ preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2392–2399

  24. Sanders JO, Carreon LY, Sucato DJ, Sturm PF, Diab M (2010) Preoperative and perioperative factors effect on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1867–1871. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181efa6f5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W, Jones J, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF, Stephens Richards B, Sucato DJ (2003) Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 28:2158–2163. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bago J, Climent JM, Pineda S, Gilperez C (2007) Further evaluation of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: correlation with curve pattern and radiological deformity. Scoliosis 2:12. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang S, Feuchtbaum E, Werner BC, Cho W, Reddi V, Arlet V (2012) Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically? Eur Spine J 21:1978–1983. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2434-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, Genc Y, Kocak O, Derman O, Erdoğan I, Yazici M (2008) Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 17:348–354. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0546-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortin C, Ehrmann Feldman D, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2013) Differences in standing and sitting postures of youth with idiopathic scoliosis from quantitative analysis of digital photographs. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. doi:10.3109/01942638.2012.747582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Gravel D, Gauthier F, Labelle H (2012) Reliability of a quantitative clinical posture assessment tool among persons with idiopathic scoliosis. Physiotherapy 98:64–75. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a research grant from Biomet/Justimplant and the Spanish Spine Society (GEER).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Vall d’Hebrón, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    Antonia Matamalas, Juan Bagó & Ferran Pellisé

  2. Institute of Research Hospital Vall d’Hebrón, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    Elisabetta D’Agata

Authors
  1. Antonia Matamalas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Bagó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisabetta D’Agata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ferran Pellisé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Matamalas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matamalas, A., Bagó, J., D’Agata, E. et al. Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?. Eur Spine J 25, 3560–3567 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3971-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3971-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation