Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the static and dynamic radiological findings characteristic of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2011, a total of 114 patients with unilateral leg pain due to L5 nerve root compression were screened to investigate the characteristic radiological findings of symptomatic foraminal stenosis. Static findings on sagittal CT images and dynamic findings on X-rays were compared between 39 surgically treated L5–S1 foraminal stenosis patients (FS group) and 75 surgically treated L4–5 intra-spinal canal stenosis patients (CS group).

Results

There was no significant difference between the FS and CS groups in all demographic data and radiologic findings, except for the segmental range of motion in sagittal plane on functional X-rays and posterior translation on extension. The segmental range of motion in sagittal plane at L5–S1 was significantly larger in the FS group (13.4 ± 3.1 vs. 4.2 ± 2.0; p = 0.03) compared to the CS group. The prevalence of 3 mm or more posterior translation at L5 was significantly higher in the FS group (38 vs. 3 %; p = 0.04) compared to the CS group, and the average posterior translation of L5 was significantly greater in the FS group (3.1 ± 1.6 mm) than that in the CS group (0.3 ± 0.6 mm) (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

A large segmental range of motion in sagittal plane of L5–S1 and posterior instability of L5 are risk factors for symptomatic L5–S1 foraminal stenosis. These dynamic radiological findings support the diagnosis of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S (1995) Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 8:464–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K, Fujiwara A, Asada T, Saito T (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 32:896–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bose K, Balasubramaniam P (1984) Nerve root canals of the lumbar spine. Spine 9:16–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton K, Kirkaldy-Willis W, Yong-Hing K, Heithoff K (1981) Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 157:191–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen M, Wall E, Brown R, Rydevik B, Garfin S (1990) Cauda equina anatomy: extrathecal nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia. Spine 15:1248–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crock H (1981) Normal, pathologic anatomy of the lumbar spinal nerve root canals. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63:487–490

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:E93–E113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara A, An H, Lim T, Haughton V (2001) Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 26:876–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K (2003) Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score with the Oswestry disability index, Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine 28:1601–1607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasegawa T, An H, Haughton V, Nowicki B (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. J Bone Joint Surg 77:32–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, An H (1996) Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 21:1005–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inufusa A, An H, Lim T, Hasegawa T, Haughton V, Nowicki B (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine 21:2412–2420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenis L, An H (2000) Spine update: lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 25:389–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkaldy-Willis W, Wedge J, Yong-Hing K, Tchang S, Korompay V, Shannon R (1982) Lumbar spinal nerve lateral entrapment. Clin Orthop 169:171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krudy AG (1992) MR myelography using heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequences with fat presaturation. Am J Roentgenol 159:1315–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunogi J, Hasue M (1991) Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine 16:1312–1320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee C, Rauschning W, Glenn W (1988) Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy, surgical decompression. Spine 13:313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liyang D, Yinkan X, Wenming Z, Zhihua Z (1989) The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal. Spine 14:523–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacNab I (1971) Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:891–903

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, Cardinal E, Breton G (1999) Differentiating lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity. Spine 24:44–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nowicki B, Haughton V, Schmidt T, Lim T, An H, Riley L, Yu L, Hong J (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. Am J Neuroradiol 17:1605–1614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter R, Hibbert C, Evans C (1984) The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine 9:418–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanderlinden R (1984) Subarticular entrapment of the dorsal root ganglion as a cause of sciatic pain. Spine 9:19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsutaka Yamada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamada, K., Aota, Y., Higashi, T. et al. Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur Spine J 24, 333–338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3683-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3683-2

Keywords

Navigation