Abstract
Purpose
To determine the static and dynamic radiological findings characteristic of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
Methods
Between 2006 and 2011, a total of 114 patients with unilateral leg pain due to L5 nerve root compression were screened to investigate the characteristic radiological findings of symptomatic foraminal stenosis. Static findings on sagittal CT images and dynamic findings on X-rays were compared between 39 surgically treated L5–S1 foraminal stenosis patients (FS group) and 75 surgically treated L4–5 intra-spinal canal stenosis patients (CS group).
Results
There was no significant difference between the FS and CS groups in all demographic data and radiologic findings, except for the segmental range of motion in sagittal plane on functional X-rays and posterior translation on extension. The segmental range of motion in sagittal plane at L5–S1 was significantly larger in the FS group (13.4 ± 3.1 vs. 4.2 ± 2.0; p = 0.03) compared to the CS group. The prevalence of 3 mm or more posterior translation at L5 was significantly higher in the FS group (38 vs. 3 %; p = 0.04) compared to the CS group, and the average posterior translation of L5 was significantly greater in the FS group (3.1 ± 1.6 mm) than that in the CS group (0.3 ± 0.6 mm) (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
A large segmental range of motion in sagittal plane of L5–S1 and posterior instability of L5 are risk factors for symptomatic L5–S1 foraminal stenosis. These dynamic radiological findings support the diagnosis of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S (1995) Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 8:464–473
Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K, Fujiwara A, Asada T, Saito T (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 32:896–903
Bose K, Balasubramaniam P (1984) Nerve root canals of the lumbar spine. Spine 9:16–18
Burton K, Kirkaldy-Willis W, Yong-Hing K, Heithoff K (1981) Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 157:191–197
Cohen M, Wall E, Brown R, Rydevik B, Garfin S (1990) Cauda equina anatomy: extrathecal nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia. Spine 15:1248–1251
Crock H (1981) Normal, pathologic anatomy of the lumbar spinal nerve root canals. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63:487–490
Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:E93–E113
Fujiwara A, An H, Lim T, Haughton V (2001) Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 26:876–882
Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K (2003) Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score with the Oswestry disability index, Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine 28:1601–1607
Hasegawa T, An H, Haughton V, Nowicki B (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. J Bone Joint Surg 77:32–38
Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, An H (1996) Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 21:1005–1009
Inufusa A, An H, Lim T, Hasegawa T, Haughton V, Nowicki B (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine 21:2412–2420
Jenis L, An H (2000) Spine update: lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 25:389–394
Kirkaldy-Willis W, Wedge J, Yong-Hing K, Tchang S, Korompay V, Shannon R (1982) Lumbar spinal nerve lateral entrapment. Clin Orthop 169:171–178
Krudy AG (1992) MR myelography using heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequences with fat presaturation. Am J Roentgenol 159:1315–1320
Kunogi J, Hasue M (1991) Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine 16:1312–1320
Lee C, Rauschning W, Glenn W (1988) Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy, surgical decompression. Spine 13:313–320
Liyang D, Yinkan X, Wenming Z, Zhihua Z (1989) The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal. Spine 14:523–525
MacNab I (1971) Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:891–903
Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, Cardinal E, Breton G (1999) Differentiating lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity. Spine 24:44–53
Nowicki B, Haughton V, Schmidt T, Lim T, An H, Riley L, Yu L, Hong J (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. Am J Neuroradiol 17:1605–1614
Porter R, Hibbert C, Evans C (1984) The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine 9:418–421
Vanderlinden R (1984) Subarticular entrapment of the dorsal root ganglion as a cause of sciatic pain. Spine 9:19–22
White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, K., Aota, Y., Higashi, T. et al. Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur Spine J 24, 333–338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3683-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3683-2