Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late infections after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with Dynesys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Dynamic stabilization of the spine was developed as an alternative to rigid fusion in chronic back pain to reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys, Zimmer CH) is one of the most popular systems available, but some midterm studies show revision rates as high as 30 %. Some late infectious complications in our patients prompted us to review them systematically. Propionibacterium recently has been shown to cause subtle infections of prosthetic material.

Materials and methods

Here, we report on a consecutive series of 50 Dynesys implants. In a median follow-up of 51 months (range 0–91), we identified 12 infectious and 11 non-infectious complications necessitating reoperation or removal of the implant in 17 patients.

Results

Material infections occurred after a median of 52 months (2–77) and were due to Propionibacterium alone (n = 4) or in combination (n = 3) in seven out of 11 patients. Clinical presentation combines new or increasing pain associated with signs of screw loosening on conventional X-rays; however, as many as 73.5 % of patients present some degree of screw loosening without being at all symptomatic of infection.

Conclusion

The high rate of late infections with low-grade germs and the frequency of screw loosening signs made us suspect a lack of integration at the bone-screw interface. Surgeons should be suspicious if the patient presents a combination of new or increasing pain and signs of screw loosening, and aggressive revision is recommended in these cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F, Wardlaw D (2007) The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benezech J, Mitulescu A (2007) Retrospective patient outcome evaluation after semi-rigid stabilization without fusion for degenerative lumbar instability. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, Oberle J (2008) Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev 31:189–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins I, Wilson-MacDonald J, Chami G, Burgoyne W, Vineyakam P, Berendt T, Fairbank J (2008) The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 17:445–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dakhil-Jerew F, Jadeja H, Cohen A, Shepperd JAN (2009) Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients. Eur Spine J 18:1486–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis R, Delamarter R, Maxwell J, Welch W, Wingate J, Sherman J (2009) Preliminary 3-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled IDE study of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system. In: Abstracts of the 24th annual meeting of the North American spine society, San Francisco, 10–17 Nov 2009, The Spine J, 86S

  7. Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert ThJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 18:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Spine 30:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee ChS, Hwang ChJ, Lee SW, Ahn YJ, Kim YT, Lee DH, Lee MY (2009) Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1637–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15:S93–S108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mullholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11:S198–S205

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mullholland RC (2008) The myth of lumbar instability: the importance of abnormal loading as a cause of low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Putzier M, Hoff E, Tohtz S, Gross C, Perka C, Strube P (2010) Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 19(12):2181–2189. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1517-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reyes-Sánchez A, Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Ramírez-Mora I, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Sánchez-Bringas G (2010) Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. doi:10-1007/s00586-010-1417-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. St Schaeren, Broger I, Jeanneret B (2008) Minimum 4-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine 33:E636–E642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schimmel JJP, Horsting PP, de Kleuver M, Wonders G, van Limbeck J (2010) Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 19:1711–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll ThM, Dubois G (2005) Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: Dynesys. Orthop Clin N Am 36:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwarzenbach O, Rohrbach N, Berlemann U (2010) Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique. Eur Spine J 19:1010–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoll ThM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11:S170–S178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Strube P, S Tohtz, Hoff E, Gross C, Perka C, Putzier M (2010) Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1549-9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Würgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M, Landolt H, Fandino J (2008) Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine 33:E66–E72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zappe B, Graf S, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W, Sendi P (2008) Propionibacterium spp. in prosthetic joint infections: a diagnostic challenge. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1039–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Maestretti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, J.A., Otten, P. & Maestretti, G. Late infections after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with Dynesys. Eur Spine J 21, 2573–2579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2366-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2366-0

Keywords

Navigation