Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomographic evaluation of odontoid process: implications for anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures in an adult population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Odontoid diameter in some individuals may not be large enough to accommodate two 3.5-mm cortical screws for anterior odontoid fracture fixation. The study was performed to evaluate, in a Brazilian population, the diameter of the odontoid process and the feasibility of using two 3.5-mm cortical screws for anterior odontoid fracture fixation.

Materials and methods

Computed tomographic (CT) scans of 88 adult patients (aged 18–78 years) were analyzed; 40 patients (45%) were male (mean age: 43.08 years) and 48 (55%) were female (mean age: 43.39 years). The minimum external and internal anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the odontoid process on sagittal and coronal planes were measured on CT multiplanar reconstructions of the cervical spine.

Results

The mean value of the minimum external anteroposterior diameter was 10.83 ± 1.08 and 7.53 ± 1.10 mm for the minimum internal anteroposterior diameter. The mean value of the minimum external transverse diameter was 9.19 ± 0.91 and 6.07 ± 1.08 mm for the minimum internal transverse diameter. The mean AP diameter was significantly larger than the mean transverse diameter; 57 (65%) individuals had the minimum external transverse diameter >9.0 mm that would allow the insertion of two 3.5-mm cortical screws with tapping, and five (6%) individuals had the minimum internal transverse diameter >8.0 mm that would allow the insertion of two 3.5-mm cortical screws without tapping.

Conclusions

The insertion of two 3.5-mm cortical screws was possible for anterior fixation of odontoid fracture in 57 (65%) individuals of our study, and there was no statistical difference between males and females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1663–1674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Apfelbaum RI, Lonser RR, Veres R, Casey A (2000) Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. J Neurosurg 93:227–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohler J (1982) Anterior stabilization for acute fractures and non-unions of the dens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:18–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grauer JN, Shafi B, Hilibrand A, Harrop JS, Kwon BK, Beiner JM, Albert TJ, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR (2005) Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures. Spine J 5:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henry AD, Bohly J, Grosse A (1999) Fixation of odontoid fractures by an anterior screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:472–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubner AR, Spinelli LF, Grosse A (1999) Decisão no tratamento das fraturas do odontóide. COLUNA/COLUMNA 9:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins JD, Coric D, Branch CL Jr (1998) A clinical comparison of one- and two-screw odontoid fixation. J Neurosurg 89:366–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maak TG, Grauer JN (2006) The contemporary treatment of odontoid injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:S53–S60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakanishi T, Sasaki T, Takahata T, Aoki Y, Sueyasu M, Uzawa M, Washiya S, Imanaka K (1980) Internal fixation of odontoid process. Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:399–406

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nucci RC, Seigal S, Merola AA, Gorup J, Mroczek KJ, Dryer J, Zipnick RI, Haher TR (1995) Computed tomographic evaluation of the normal adult odontoid. Implications for internal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:264–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel AA, Lindsey R, Bessey JT, Chapman J, Rampersaud R (2010) Surgical treatment of unstable type II odontoid fractures in skeletally mature individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S209–S218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasso R, Doherty BJ, Crawford MJ, Heggeness MH (1993) Biomechanics of odontoid fracture fixation. Comparison of the one- and two-screw technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1950–1953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaffler MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Garfin SR (1992) Morphology of the dens. A quantitative study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:738–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yusof MI, Yusof AH, Abdullah MS, Hussin TM (2007) Computed tomographic evaluation of the odontoid process for two-screw fixation in type-II fracture: a Malaysian perspective. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15:67–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murilo Tavares Daher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daher, M.T., Daher, S., Nogueira-Barbosa, M.H. et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of odontoid process: implications for anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures in an adult population. Eur Spine J 20, 1908–1914 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1879-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1879-2

Keywords

Navigation