Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring masseter muscle evoked responses enables faster tracheal intubation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate whether monitoring neuromuscular block at the masseter muscle (MM) would allow faster tracheal intubation when compared with that at the adductor pollicis muscle (APM).

Methods

Twenty female patients undergoing gynecological surgery were enrolled into this study. Immediately after inducing anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol, both the left masseter and ulnar nerves were stimulated in a 2 Hz train-of-four (TOF) mode using peripheral nerve stimulators. Contractions of the MM were felt with the anesthesiologist’s left hand lifting the patient’s jaw and holding an anesthesia facemask, while those of the APM were visually observed. Immediately after the contracting responses of the muscles were confirmed, all of the patients received an iv bolus of vecuronium 0.1 mg kg−1. Onset times after vecuronium were defined as the duration until the contractions became impalpable at the MM or invisible at the APM. When the contraction of the MM could no longer be felt, the conditions for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were assessed.

Results

Onset time evaluated tactually at the MM (mean ± SD, 108.4 ± 27.7 s) was significantly shorter than that evaluated visually at the APM (181.2 ± 32.1 s, P < 0.0001). The intubating conditions for all patients were graded as either excellent or good.

Conclusion

Tactual evaluation of muscle paralysis of the MM during induction of anesthesia is clinically useful since it leads to faster tracheal intubation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meistelman C, Plaud B, Donati F. Rocuronium (ORG 9426) neuromuscular blockade at the adductor muscles of the larynx and adductor pollicis in humans. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39:665–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantineau JP, Porte F, d’Honneur G, Duvaldestin P. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauvin M, Lebrault C, Duvaldestin P. The neuromuscular blocking effect of vecuronium on the human diaphragm. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Mey JC, De Baerdemaeker L, De Latt M, Rolly G. The onset of neuromuscular block at the masseter muscle as a predictor of optimal intubating conditions with rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16:387–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Rossi L, Preußler NP, Pühringer FK, Klein U. Onset of neuromuscular block at the masseter and adductor pollicis muscles following rocuronium or succinylcholine. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:1133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR. Differential effects of pancuronium on masseter and adductor pollicis muscles in humans. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hemmerling TM, Donati F. Neuromuscular blockade at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilli muscle: a review. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:779–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Plaud B, Proost JH, Wierda MKH, Barre J, Debaene B, Meistelman C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium at the vocal cords and the adductor pollicis in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;58:185–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura Y, Torisu T, Noguchi K, Fujii H. Changes in masseter muscle blood flow during voluntary isometric contraction in humans. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:545–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdulatif M, El-Sanabary M. Blood flow and mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block at the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis muscles. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:24–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi WW, Gergis SD, Sokoll MD. The effects of d-tubocurarine, pancuronium and atracurium on the responses of gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the cat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984;28:608–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibebunjo C, Srikant CB, Donati F. Morphological correlates of the differential responses of muscles to vecuronium. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:284–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowlerson A, Raoul G, Daniel Y, Close J, Maurage CA, Ferri J, et al. Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Helbo-Hansen HS, Bang U, Nielsen HK, Skovgaard LT. The accuracy of train-of-four monitoring at varying stimulating currents. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:199–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was performed using the institutional fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Suzuki.

About this article

Cite this article

Kitajima, O., Suzuki, T., Watanabe, N. et al. Monitoring masseter muscle evoked responses enables faster tracheal intubation. J Anesth 24, 173–176 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-009-0848-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-009-0848-y

Keywords

Navigation