Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor diameter and Ki-67 expression in biopsy could be diagnostic markers discriminating from adenoma and early stage cancer in patients with ampullary tumors

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

Ampullary early stage cancer (early CA) potentially harbors lymphovascular invasion; there are few data on markers that could differentiate adenoma and early CA.

Aim

To investigate those markers, we compared the tumor diameter and Ki-67 expression in endoscopy biopsy specimens of adenoma with those of early CA.

Methods

Patients on whom endoscopic papillectomy (EP) was performed (n = 35) with histopathologically proven adenomas and with low/high grade dysplasia and early CA were studied. We made pre-procedure evaluations of ampullary tumors by using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and transpapillary intraductal ultrasonography. Tumor diameter was measured by EUS. Endoscopic biopsy using immunostaining of Ki-67 labeling index (LI) prior to EP were evaluated.

Results

The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for tumor diameter and Ki-67 expression were 0.824 and 0.873, respectively. Cut-off values calculated based on AUROC data were 15 mm in tumor diameter and 32 cells/high-power field (HPF) in Ki-67. Early CA (n = 11) was diagnosed by using a cut-off value for tumor diameter in 8 out of 11 patients (sensitivity 72.7 %, specificity 66.7 %, accuracy 68.6 %). Significant infiltration of the major duodenal papilla by Ki-67 positive tumor cells (>31/HPF) was recognized in 8 of the 11 patients with early CA (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 54.2 %, accuracy 62.9 %).

Conclusions

Observation of tumor diameter and Ki-67 LI would be helpful for safety EP. EP should not be indicated for ampullary tumors more than 15 mm in diameter and/or Ki-67 LI 31/HPF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoon SM, Kim MH, Kim MJ, Jang SJ, Lee TY, Kwon S, et al. Focal early stage cancer in ampullary adenoma: surgery or endoscopic papillectomy? GIE. 2007;66:701–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salmi S, Ezzedine S, Vitton V, Menard C, Gonzales JM, Desjeux A, et al. Can papillary carcinomas be treated by endoscopic ampullectomy? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:920–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Olono K, Herman JM, de Jong MC, Hruban RH, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of ampullary neoplasms in 450 patients: implication for surgical strategy and long-term prognosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:379–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Irani S, Arai A, Ayub K, Biehl T, Brandabur JJ, Dorerr, R et al. Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period. GIE. 2009;70:923–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda N, Kobayashi G, Horaguchi J, Takazawa O, et al. Preoperative evaluation of ampullary neoplasm with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and transpapillary intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS)—a prospective and histopathologically controlled study. GIE. 2007;60:740–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M, Kitamura K. Endoscopic biopsy has limited accuracy in diagnosis of ampullary tumors. GIE. 1990;36:588–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kubota K, Kakuta Y, Kawamura S, Saito S, Seki H, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic biopsy using immunostaining of p53 and Ki-67 in tumor of the ampulla of Vater. Pathol Int. 2003;53:361–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel R, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic ampullectomy techniques and outcomes. J Clin Gastoenterol. 2012;46:8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woo SM, Ryu JK, Lee SH, Lee WJ, Hwang JH, Yoo JW, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic papillectomy in early stage ampulla of Vater cancer. GIE. 2008;24:120–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Itoh A, Tsukamoto Y, Naitoh Y, Gotoh H, et al. Intraductal ultrasonography in diagnosing tumor extension of cancer the papilla of Vater. GIE. 1997;45:251–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlemper AD, Riddle RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, et al. The Vienna classification of the gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. GUT. 2000;47:251–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Igarashi Y, Okano N, Ito K, Miura T, Nakano S. Endoscopic snare excision of a major duodenal papillary tumor. Dig Surg. 2010;27:119–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH, Kim JH, Han JH, Yoo BM, Kim MW, Kim WH. Is endoscopic papillectomy safe for ampullary adenomas with high-grade dysplasia? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2547–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kensuke Kubota.

About this article

Cite this article

Kubota, K., Fujita, Y., Sato, T. et al. Tumor diameter and Ki-67 expression in biopsy could be diagnostic markers discriminating from adenoma and early stage cancer in patients with ampullary tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20, 531–537 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-013-0594-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-013-0594-2

Keywords

Navigation