Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for a sub-classification of hepato-biliary-pancreatic operations for surgical site infection surveillance following assessment of results of prospective multicenter data

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance in Japan is based on the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system, which categorizes all hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgeries, except for cholecystectomy, into “BILI.” We evaluated differences among BILI procedures to determine the optimal subdivision for SSI surveillance.

Methods

We conducted multicenter SSI surveillance at 20 hospitals. BILI was subdivided into choledochectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction, pancreatoduodenectomy with hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy and total pancreatectomy to determine the optimal subdivision. The outcome of interest was SSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive significance of variables in each type of surgery.

Results

1,926 BILI cases were included in this study. SSI rates were 23.2 % for all BILI; for choledochectomy 23.6 %, pancreatoduodenectomy 39.3 %, hepatectomy 12.8 %, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction 41.9 %, pancreatoduodenectomy with hepatectomy 27.3 %, distal pancreatectomy 31.8 %, and total pancreatectomy 20.0 %. SSI rates for hepatectomy were significantly lower than those for non-hepatectomy BILI. Risk factors for developing SSI with hepatectomy were drain placement and long operative duration, while for non-hepatectomy BILI, risk factors were use of intra-abdominal silk sutures, SSI risk index and long operative duration.

Conclusions

Hepatectomy and non-hepatectomy BILI differ with regard to the incidence of and risk factors for developing SSI. These surgeries should be assessed separately when conducting SSI surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–78 (quiz 79–80).

  2. Olson MM, Lee JT Jr. Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg. 1990;125:794–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60:27–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–85.

  5. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–7S.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ambiru S, Kato A, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Otsuka M, et al. Poor postoperative blood glucose control increases surgical site infections after surgery for hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a high-volume institute in Japan. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68:230–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Ohtsuka M, Kato A, Yoshitomi H, et al. Increased plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8 are associated with surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas. 2006;32:178–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakata J, Shirai Y, Tsuchiya Y, Wakai T, Nomura T, Hatakeyama K. Preoperative cholangitis independently increases in-hospital mortality after combined major hepatic and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:1065–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM, et al. Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg. 2004;239:194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg. 2006;93:422–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg. 1996;171:158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okabayashi T, Maeda H, Nishimori I, Sugimoto T, Ikeno T, Hanazaki K. Pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy; for prevention of this deep surgical site infection after pancreatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:519–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Togo S, Kubota T, Takahashi T, Yoshida K, Matsuo K, Morioka D, et al. Usefulness of absorbable sutures in preventing surgical site infection in hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1041–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimizu J, Ikeda K, Fukunaga M, Murata K, Miyamoto A, Umeshita K, et al. Multicenter prospective randomized phase II study of antimicrobial prophylaxis in low-risk patients undergoing colon surgery. Surg Today. 2010;40:954–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Condon RE, Schulte WJ, Malangoni MA, Anderson-Teschendorf MJ. Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program. Arch Surg. 1983;118:303–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Panis Y, Fekete F. Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1993;218:748–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Shimabukuro R, Yamanaka T, Iso Y, Baba H, et al. Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 2008;38:404–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kronborg O. Polyglycolic acid (Dexon) versus silk for fascial closure of abdominal incisions. Acta Chir Scand. 1976;142:9–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Abe T, Yukaya T, Tsujita E, Gion T, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2338–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:783–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC, Daily MF, Gedaly R. Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB (Oxford) 2012;14:136–41.

  23. Sorensen LT, Horby J, Friis E, Pilsgaard B, Jorgensen T. Smoking as a risk factor for wound healing and infection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:815–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1209–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chong T, Sawyer R. Update on the epidemiology and prevention of surgical site infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2002;4:484–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Qadan M, Akca O, Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Polk HC, Jr. Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 2009;144:359–66 (discussion 66–7).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the nurses and physicians who cooperated in this project. Special thanks to Ikeda Municipal Hospital, NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka Senin Hoken Hospital, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Kanou Hospital, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Nara Hospital Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Kinki Central Hospital Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Kobe Ekisaikai Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Shitennoji Hospital, Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Itami City Hospital, Kawanishi City Hospital, Sakai Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Suita Municipal Hospital, Higashiosaka City General Hospital, Fujimoto Hospital, Minoh City Hospital, and Yao Municipal Hospital.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Nakahira.

About this article

Cite this article

Nakahira, S., Shimizu, J., Miyamoto, A. et al. Proposal for a sub-classification of hepato-biliary-pancreatic operations for surgical site infection surveillance following assessment of results of prospective multicenter data. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20, 504–511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0590-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0590-y

Keywords

Navigation