Abstract
Bundles that define mandatory items or procedures to be performed in clinical practice have been increasingly used in guidelines in recent years. Observance of bundles enables improvement of the prognosis of target diseases as well as guideline preparation. There were no bundles adopted in the Tokyo Guidelines 2007, but the updated Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) have adopted this useful tool. Items or procedures strongly recommended in clinical practice have been prepared in the practical guidelines and presented as management bundles. TG13 defined the mandatory items for the management of acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis. Critical parts of the bundles in TG13 include diagnostic process, severity assessment, transfer of patients if necessary, therapeutic approach, and time course. Their observance should improve the prognosis of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. When utilizing TG13 management bundles, further clinical research needs to be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of the bundles. It is also expected that the present report will lead to evidence construction and contribute to further updating of the Tokyo Guidelines.
Free full-text articles and a mobile application of TG13 are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/tg13.html.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A bundle is a group of therapies for a disease that, when implemented together, may result in better outcomes than if implemented individually. In recent years, bundles that define mandatory items or procedures to be performed in clinical practice have been increasingly used in guidelines [1]. Compliance with bundles results in the preparation of guidelines as well as an improved prognosis of targeted diseases arising from the use of the guidelines [2, 3]. Levy et al. [4] reported that data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality, and compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9 % in the first site quarter to 31.3 % by the end of 2 years. Furthermore the odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8 % per quarter and 5.4 % over 2 years.
Murata et al. [5, 6] examined a total of 60,842 patients with acute cholangitis using the Japanese national administrative database. This report demonstrated the improved prognosis of in-hospital mortality with odds ratio of 0.856 among patients who were managed with high compliance with the items of recommendation Grades A and B in Tokyo Guidelines 2007 (TG07) as compared with the patients who were low-compliance. This shows the importance of preparing bundles by setting the recommended items to be observed in the guidelines. Although TG07 did not prepare bundles at that time, the updated Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13) have adopted the management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. The care bundles are designed to be easily achievable and sustainable both to implement and to audit.
Furthermore, we made a checklist. We hope to use the acute cholangitis and cholecystitis bundle checklist to help track your organization’s compliance with implementing each element of these bundles.
Efficacy of the bundle
In the process of developing TG13, mandatory items or procedures to be included in the management bundles have been discussed and defined among the Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee members. The bundles have been developed and finalized by obtaining consensus. Based on the recommendations in TG13, items which are expected to yield favorable treatment results are included in the bundles. To underscore the time course or timing of the performance of each item, management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis have been developed. A checklist has also been prepared to confirm compliance with the bundles.
The bundles such as sepsis bundle [7–9], ventilator bundle [10, 11] or central line bundle [12], when implemented together, may result in better outcomes than if implemented individually. Good prognosis is also reported in cases in which a bundle has been achieved, but this may show that those cases which have achieved a bundle are in such good condition as to enable achievement of a bundle.
However, the improvement in prognosis in patients achieved through education concerning bundles demonstrates that implementation of bundles and education concerning them have been useful [9, 13].
Controversial points and harmful effects of bundles
There are many problems to be solved for the spread and implementation of bundles. In the guidelines, even if useful items have been implemented, the prognosis in patients is not improved without common knowledge of management bundles among medical care workers [13]. Furthermore, it is not possible to put bundles into practice without sufficient manpower and equipment [14], which should be improved, if possible. If improvement is impossible, an alternative treatment should be provided or patients should be transferred to a medical facility where the contents of bundles can be put into practice [15].
There is also a concern that bundles are used not for the purpose of improving the prognosis in patients and increasing efficiency, but for limiting the contents of medical care to keep health care costs down. Furthermore, failure to carry out the contents of bundles should not lead to lawsuits [15].
Acute cholangitis management bundle (Table 1)
Items in the cholangitis management bundle are described in Table 1. The content of every bundle is developed from the recommendation of TG13. The mandatory items or procedures to be included in the management bundles have been discussed and defined among the Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee members. The diagnostic criteria and the severity assessment of acute cholangitis in TG13 was made based on the article of Kiriyama et al. [16].
Acute cholecystitis management bundle (Table 2)
Items in the cholecystitis management bundle are described in Table 2. The content of every bundle is classified into the recommendation of TG13. The mandatory items or procedures to be included in the management bundles have been discussed and defined among the Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee members. The diagnostic criteria and the severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in TG13 was made based on the article of Yokoe et al. [17].
Check list for the use of management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis (Tables 3, 4)
A check list is shown for the effective use of bundles. The use of this list for medical care ensures standards, and is thought to improve effectiveness of the bundles. These check lists, including procedures, laboratories, monitoring and interventions required, should be placed by the bedside.
Conclusions
Bundles consist of important items for the effective use of TG13. Compliance with the bundles is expected to improve the prognosis of acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis. Reports from various facilities have demonstrated that improved prognosis is expected through the use of the Tokyo Guidelines for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Furthermore, good use of those reports will contribute to evidence construction and future revision of TG13.
References
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327.
Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, Galvin C. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:507–12.
Benneyan JC, Taseli A. Exact and approximate probability distributions of evidence-based bundle composite compliance measures. Health Care Manag Sci. 2010;13:193–209.
Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Linde-Zwirble WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:222–31.
Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, et al. Evaluation of compliance with the Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis based on the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:53–9.
Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, et al. An observational study using a national administrative database to determine the impact of hospital volume on compliance with clinical practice guidelines. Med Care. 2011;49:313–20.
Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2005;9:R764–70.
Nguyen HB, Corbett SW, Steele R, Banta J, Clark RT, Hayes SR, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1012–105.
Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, Blanco J, González-Díaz G, Garnacho-Montero J, et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA. 2008;299:2294–303.
Galpern D, Guerrero A, Tu A, Fahoum B, Wise L. Effectiveness of a central line bundle campaign on line-associated infections in the intensive care unit. Surgery. 2008;144:492–5.
Berriel-Cass D, Adkins FW, Jones P, Fakih MG. Eliminating nosocomial infections at Ascension Health. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:612–20.
Crocker C, Kinnear W. Weaning from ventilation: does a care bundle approach work? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24:180–6.
De Miguel-Yanes JM, Andueza-Lillo JA, Gonzalez-Ramallo VJ, Pastor L, Muñoz J. Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24:553–9.
McNeill G, Dixon M, Jenkins P. Can acute medicine units in the UK comply with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s six-hour care bundle? Clin Med. 2008;8:163–5.
Mayumi T, Takada T, Hirata K, Yoshida M, Sekimoto M, Hirota M, et al. Pancreatitis bundles. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:87–9.
Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Pitt HA, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholangitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:548–56.
Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:578–85.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our deep gratitude to the following organizations for their great support and guidance in the preparation of TG13: Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, Japan Biliary Association, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Okamoto, K., Takada, T., Strasberg, S.M. et al. TG13 management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20, 55–59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0562-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0562-2