Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: a single center experience

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Surgery can offer the only chance for a cure in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and a growing number of elderly patients are undergoing resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient age on surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

From 2001 to 2011, 431 consecutive patients underwent a potentially curative resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after surgery were compared between octogenarians (80 years and older, n = 21) and younger patients (less than 80 years old, n = 410).

Results

All 21 octogenarians were healthy and deemed to be candidates for surgery; however, twenty (95 %) had one or more comorbidities. Nineteen (90 %) octogenarians underwent major hepatectomy with bile duct resection and the remaining two (10 %) underwent bile duct resection only, whereas almost all the (99 %) younger patients underwent hepatectomy (P = 0.021). Postoperative morbidity and mortality occurred in 57 and 5 % of the octogenarians, respectively. These rates were similar to those in the younger patients (P = 0.372 and P = 0.332, respectively). The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates in the octogenarians were both 56.8 %, and 3 patients survived for more than 5 years. Their survival rate was similar to that of the younger patients (P = 0.348).

Conclusions

Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be safely performed even in octogenarians, and careful patient selection can lead to acceptable morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival. Octogenarian patients should not be precluded from surgical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg. 2004;240:698–708 (discussion 10).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397–406 (discussion 7).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ezaki T, Yukaya H, Ogawa Y. Evaluation of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1987;74:471–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagasue N, Chang YC, Takemoto Y, Taniura H, Kohno H, Nakamura T. Liver resection in the aged (seventy years or older) with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 1993;113:148–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg. 1995;222:426–34 (discussion 34–7).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yeh CN, Jan YY, Chen MF. Hepatectomy for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1553–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menon KV, Al-Mukhtar A, Aldouri A, Prasad RK, Lodge PA, Toogood GJ. Outcomes after major hepatectomy in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:677–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazzoni G, Tocchi A, Miccini M, Bettelli E, Cassini D, De Santis M, et al. Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Figueras J, Ramos E, Lopez-Ben S, Torras J, Albiol M, Llado L, et al. Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients. When is it worthwhile? Clin Transl Oncol. 2007;9:392–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann CD, Neal CP, Pattenden CJ, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G, Dennison AR, et al. Major resection of hepatic colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients—an aggressive approach is justified. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:428–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Funagayama M, Kai M, Otani K, Ohuchida J. Hepatic resection is justified for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32:2223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shirabe K, Kajiyama K, Harimoto N, Gion T, Tsujita E, Abe T, et al. Early outcome following hepatic resection in patients older than 80 years of age. World J Surg. 2009;33:1927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oishi K, Itamoto T, Kobayashi T, Oshita A, Amano H, Ohdan H, et al. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients aged 75 years or more. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:695–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang J, Li BK, Chen GH, Li JQ, Zhang YQ, Li GH, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho SW, Steel J, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC. Safety of liver resection in the elderly: how important is age? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1088–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nanashima A, Abo T, Nonaka T, Fukuoka H, Hidaka S, Takeshita H, et al. Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection: are elderly patients suitable for surgery? J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:284–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Shionoya S. Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg. 1990;14:535–43 (discussion 44).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Nimura Y. “Anatomic” right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;243:28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, Noike T, Miwa S, Miyagawa S. Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg. 2003;238:84–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, Noie T, Takayama T, Kosuge T, et al. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg. 2003;238:73–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg. 2006;244:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N et al. Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999;230:808–18 (discussion 19).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, Ha TY, Moon DB, Jung DH, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:476–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2003;238:720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hemming AW, Kim RD, Mekeel KL, Fujita S, Reed AI, Foley DP et al. Portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2006;72:599–604 (discussion 5).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Nishio H, Ebata T, Igami T, Matsushita M, et al. Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2010;252:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, et al. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery. 2007;141:581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Shimada K, Kosuge T, Kimata Y, Sakuraba M, et al. Clinical significance of reconstruction of the right hepatic artery for biliary malignancy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391:203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaneoka Y, Yamaguchi A, Isogai M, Kumada T. Survival benefit of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma in comparison to hepatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2010;34:2662–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Takahashi Y, Nimura Y, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients. Ann Surg (in press).

  31. Sawada T, Kita J, Rokkaku K, Kato M, Shimoda M, Kubota K. Outcome of surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1971–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Oda K, et al. Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nishio H, Nagino M, Nimura Y. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Nagoya experience. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7:259–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Nimura Y, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the “new era”: the Nagoya University experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:449–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1992;215:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ikeyama T, Nagino M, Oda K, Ebata T, Nishio H, Nimura Y. Surgical approach to Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas: audit of 54 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H, Ebata T, Arai T, Nimura Y. Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 2006;243:364–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Nimura Y. One hundred consecutive hepatobiliary resections for biliary hilar malignancy: preoperative blood donation, blood loss, transfusion, and outcome. Surgery. 2005;137:148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kamiya S, Nagino M, Kanazawa H, Komatsu S, Mayumi T, Takagi K, et al. The value of bile replacement during external biliary drainage: an analysis of intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora. Ann Surg. 2004;239:510–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kanazawa H, Nagino M, Kamiya S, Komatsu S, Mayumi T, Takagi K, et al. Synbiotics reduce postoperative infectious complications: a randomized controlled trial in biliary cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:104–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sugawara G, Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T, Takagi K, Asahara T, et al. Perioperative synbiotic treatment to prevent postoperative infectious complications in biliary cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244:706–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Endo S, Yoshikawa Y, Hatanaka N, Tominaga H, Shimizu Y, Hiraoka K, et al. Treatment for gastric carcinoma in the oldest old patients. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hellmann S, Schafmayer C, Hinz S, Schniewind B, Tepel J, Broering DC, et al. Evaluation of the POSSUM score in surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:403–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pope D, Ramesh H, Gennari R, Corsini G, Maffezzini M, Hoekstra HJ, et al. Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): a comprehensive assessment of underlying characteristics of elderly cancer patients prior to elective surgery. Surg Oncol. 2006;15:189–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Adam R, Frilling A, Elias D, Laurent C, Ramos E, Capussotti L, et al. Liver resection of colorectal metastases in elderly patients. Br J Surg. 2010;97:366–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, Gamblin TC, Geller DA, Marsh JW, et al. Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Nagino.

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, Y., Ebata, T., Yokoyama, Y. et al. Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: a single center experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20, 324–331 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0529-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0529-3

Keywords

Navigation