Skip to main content
Log in

Canonical processes of semantically annotated media production

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Multimedia Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many multimedia systems allow the association of semantic annotations with media assets, there is no agreed-upon way of sharing these among systems. As an initial step within the multimedia community, we identify a small number of fundamental processes of media production, which we term canonical processes. We specify their inputs and outputs, but deliberately do not specify their inner workings, concentrating rather on the information flow between them. We thus identify a small set of building blocks that can be supported in semantically aware media production tools. The processes are identified in conjunction with a number of different research groups within the community who supply, in the companion papers, descriptions of existing systems and a mapping to them. We give a basic formalisation of the processes and discuss how this fits with other formalisation endeavours. We present a number of frequently asked questions during the development of the model and this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arndt, R., Troncy, R., Staab, S., Hardman, L., Vacura, M.: COMM: Designing a well-founded multimedia ontology for the Web. In The Semantic Web—ISWC/ASWC 2007, vol. 4825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 30–43, Busan, Korea, 11–15 November 2007

  2. Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A., Carlis, J.V.: Supporting multimedia designers: towards more effective design tools. In: Proceedings of Multimedia Modeling: Modeling Mutlimedia Information and Systems (MMM2001), pp. 267–286. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI) (2001)

  3. Bocconi, S., Nack, F., Hardman, L.: Using rhetorical annotations for generating video documentaries. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (2005)

  4. Davis, M.: Active capture: integrating human–computer interaction and computer vision/audition to automate media capture. In: ICME ’03, Proceedings, pp. 185–188 (2003)

  5. Dorai, C., Venkatesh, S.: Bridging the semantic gap in content management systems—computational media aesthetics. In: Dorai, C., Venkatesh, S. (eds) Media computing—computational media aesthetics, pp. 1–9. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

  6. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.,Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: EKAW ’02: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pp. 166–181. Siguenza, Spain, 01–04 October 2002. Springer, Heidelberg

  7. Halasz, F., Schwartz, M.: Grønbæck, K., Trigg, R. (eds) The dexter hypertext reference model. Commun ACM 37(2), 30–39 (1994)

  8. Hardman, L.: Modelling and Authoring Hypermedia Documents. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1998. ISBN: 90-74795-93-5, also available at http://www.cwi.nl/~lynda/thesis/

  9. ISO/IEC: Overview of the MPEG-7 Standard (version 6.0). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11/N4980, Pattaya (2001)

  10. Jain R. (2003). Experiential computing. Commun ACM 46(7): 48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerhervé, B., Ouali, A., Landon, P.: Design and production of new media artworks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Multimedia for Human Communication—From Capture to Convey (MHC 05) (2005)

  12. Kosch, H., Böszörményi, L., Döller, M., Libsie, M., Schojer, P., Kofler, A.: The life cycle of multimedia metadata. IEEE MultiMedia, (January–March) pp. 80–86 (2005)

  13. Nack, F., Lindsay, A.T.: Everything you wanted to know about MPEG-7: part 1. IEEE multiMedia, pp. 65–77 (1999)

  14. Nack, F., Putz, W.: Designing annotation before it’s needed. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 251–260. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 30 September–5 October, 2001

  15. Pereira F., Vetro A. and Sikora T. (2008). Multimedia retrieval and delivery: essential metadata challenges and standards. Proc IEEE 96(4): 721–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reif, G., Morger, M., Gall, H.: Semantic clipboard—semantically enriched data exchange between desktop applications. In: SemDesk2006 Workshop at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2006), Athens, GA, USA, November (2006)

  17. W3C.: Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.0) Specification. In: Cohen A (ed) W3C Recommendation, 7 August 2001

  18. W3C.: Web Ontology Language (OWL)—overview. W3C recommendation, 10 February 2004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Željko Obrenović.

Additional information

Lynda Hardman is also affiliated with the Technical University of Eindhoven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardman, L., Obrenović, Ž., Nack, F. et al. Canonical processes of semantically annotated media production. Multimedia Systems 14, 327–340 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-008-0134-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-008-0134-0

Keywords

Navigation