Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of social-emotional context in chronic cancer pain: patient-caregiver reverberations

Social-emotional context in chronic cancer pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 14 November 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Pain is a multifactorial and subjective experience. Psychological and social factors can modulate it. This study analyzed whether and how prolonged cancer pain is related to the social-relational environment’s characteristics. Specifically, we investigated whether the caregiver’s emotional support, his/her compassion ability or, on the contrary, his/her personal distress, associates with the patient’s pain level.

Methods

The sample consisted of 38 cancer patients suffering from pain and 38 family caregivers. The patients completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) referred to caregiver, and an interview concerning the patient’s perception of the caregiver’s compassion level. Caregivers completed the distress thermometer (DT), the BEES, and an interview assessment of their compassion level.

Results

Caregiver’s distress level correlated with patient’s pain intensity (r = .389; p = .028). Exploratory linear regression confirmed this association (R2 = .151; F (1, 30) = 5.33; p = .028; β = 0.389). The number of problems reported by caregivers correlated with the patients’ pain level (r = .375; p = .020), which was verified in a regression analysis (R2 = .140; F (1, 36) = 5.88; p = .020; β = 0.375). In particular, the caregiver’s amount of emotional problems was related to patient’s pain level (r = .427; p = .007); this result was reaffirmed in a regression (R2 = .182; F (1, 36) = 8.03; p = .007; β = 0.427).

Conclusions

Our results show an association between social suffering, as indicated by the caregiver’s emotional distress and the patient’s physical pain. The results also highlight high distress levels and emotional problems among caregivers. The work emphasizes the need of a bio-psychosocial approach in managing cancer pain, along with the necessity to find effective interventions to fight emotional distress in family caregivers. The recovery of the caregivers’ emotional resources could have beneficial implications on the patients’ pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 14 November 2018

    The last 4 authornames in the original manscript was inadvertently inverted and is now corrected in this article.

References

  1. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Panel (2003) National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15–17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(15):1110–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keefe FJ, Abernethy AP, Campbell CL (2005) Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain. Annu Rev Psychol 56:601–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannibal KE, Bishop MD (2014) Chronic stress, cortisol dysfunction, and pain: a psychoneuroendocrine rationale for stress management in pain rehabilitation. Phys Ther 94(12):1816–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Torta RG, Ieraci V (2013) Depressive disorders and pain: a joint model of diagnosis and treatment. J Pain Relief S 2:2167–0846

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lumley MA, Cohen JL, Borszcz GS, Cano A, Radcliffe AM, Porter LS, Schubiner H, Keefe FJ (2011) Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent research. J Clin Psychol 67(9):942–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC (2007) The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 133(4):581–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Linton SJ, Shaw WS (2011) Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther 91(5):700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sturgeon JA, Zautra AJ (2013) Psychological resilience, pain catastrophizing, and positive emotions: perspectives on comprehensive modeling of individual pain adaptation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 17(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koyama T, McHaffie JG, Laurienti PJ, Coghill RC (2005) The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(36):12950–12955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Colloca L, Grillon C (2014) Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lutgendorf, S. K., De Geest, K., Bender, D., Ahmed, A., Goodheart, M. J., Dahmoush, L., ... & Thaker, P. H. (2012) Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(23):2885–2890

  12. López-Martínez AE, Esteve-Zarazaga R, Ramírez-Maestre C (2008) Perceived social support and coping responses are independent variables explaining pain adjustment among chronic pain patients. J Pain 9(4):373–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor SE (2011) Social support: a review. The Oxford handbook of health psychology. OUP, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uchino BN (2006) Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med 29(4):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cole SW, Hawkley LC, Arevalo JM, Sung CY, Rose RM, Cacioppo JT (2007) Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biol 8(9):R189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Montoya P, Larbig W, Braun C, Preissl H, Birbaumer N (2004) Influence of social support and emotional context on pain processing and magnetic brain responses in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 50(12):4035–4044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenberger NI (2012) The pain of social disconnection: examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 13(6):421–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD (2003) Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 302(5643):290–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenberger NI, Jarcho JM, Lieberman MD, Naliboff BD (2006) An experimental study of shared sensitivity to physical pain and social rejection. Pain 126(1):132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein MJ, Claypool HM (2012) Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 38(2):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riva P, Wirth JH, Williams KD (2011) The consequences of pain: the social and physical pain overlap on psychological responses. Eur J Soc Psychol 41(6):681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blum K, Sherman DW (2010) Understanding the experience of caregivers: a focus on transitions. Semin Oncol Nurs 26(4):243–258 

  23. Schulz R, Sherwood PR (2008) Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. J Soc Work Educ 44(sup3):105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C (2010) Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology 19(10):1013–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Girgis A, Lambert S, Johnson C, Waller A, Currow D (2012) Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: a review. J Oncol Pract 9(4):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1156(1):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Loggia ML, Mogil JS, Bushnell MC (2008) Empathy hurts: compassion for another increases both sensory and affective components of pain perception. Pain 136(1):168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singer T, Klimecki OM (2014) Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol 24(18):R875–R878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eisenberg N, Eggum ND (2009) Empathic responding: sympathy and personal distress. In The social neuroscience of empathy 6:71–83 

  30. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R et al (2015) A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain 156(6):1003

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 103(7):1494–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehrabian A (1996) Manual for the balanced emotional empathy scale (BEES). (Available from Albert Mehrabian, 1130 Alta Mesa Road, Monterey, CA, USA 93940)

  33. Barrett-Lennard GT (2015) The relationship inventory: A complete resource and guide. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken

  34. Melzack R (1975) The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1(3):277–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M (2011) Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf-36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care Res 63(S11):S240–S252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1990) Empathy: conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motiv Emot 14(2):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wool MS, Mor V (2005) A multidimensional model for understanding cancer pain. Cancer Investig 23(8):727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miaskowski C, Kragness L, Dibble S, Wallhagen M (1997) Differences in mood states, health status, and caregiver strain between family caregivers of oncology outpatients with and without cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 13(3):138–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz R, Hebert RS, Dew MA, Brown SL, Scheier MF, Beach SR et al (2007) Patient suffering and caregiver compassion: new opportunities for research, practice, and policy. Gerontologist 47(1):4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zaza C, Baine N (2002) Cancer pain and psychosocial factors: a critical review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 24(5):526–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LM (2004) Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain 5(4):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hodges LJ, Humphris GM, Macfarlane G (2005) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 60(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Harding G, Campbell J, Parsons S, Rahman A, Underwood M (2010) British pain clinic practitioners’ recognition and use of the bio-psychosocial pain management model for patients when physical interventions are ineffective or inappropriate: results of a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(1):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Lamm C, Singer T (2012) Functional neural plasticity and associated changes in positive affect after compassion training. Cereb Cortex 23(7):1552–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Ricard M, Singer T (2013) Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(6):873–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina De Laurentis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Laurentis, M., Rossana, B., Andrea, B. et al. The impact of social-emotional context in chronic cancer pain: patient-caregiver reverberations. Support Care Cancer 27, 705–713 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4530-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4530-5

Keywords

Navigation