Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Enhancing Connections-Telephone study: a pilot feasibility test of a cancer parenting program

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of the study were to (1) test the short-term impact of a telephone-delivered cancer parenting education program, the Enhancing Connections-Telephone (EC-T) Program, on maternal anxiety, depressed mood, parenting competencies, and child behavioral-emotional adjustment and (2) compare those outcomes with outcomes achieved from an in-person delivery of the same program (EC).

Methods

Thirty-two mothers comprised the sample for the within-group design and 77 mothers for the between-group design. Mothers were eligible if they had one or more dependent children and were recently diagnosed with stages 0–III breast cancer. Mothers in both groups received five intervention sessions at 2-week intervals from a patient educator using a fully scripted intervention manual.

Results

Outcomes from the within-group analysis revealed significant improvements on maternal anxiety, parenting competencies, and the child’s behavioral-emotional functioning. Outcomes from the between-group analysis showed the EC-T did as well or better than EC in positively affecting maternal anxiety, depressed mood, parenting competencies, and the child’s behavioral-emotional adjustment. Furthermore, the EC-T had a significantly greater impact than the EC on maternal confidence in helping their family and themselves manage the cancer’s impact and in staying calm during emotionally charged conversations about the breast cancer with their child.

Conclusions

Regardless of the channel of delivery, the Enhancing Connections Program has the potential to positively affect parenting competencies and behavioral-emotional adjustment in mothers and dependent children in the first year of stages 0–III maternal breast cancer. Its positive impact from telephone delivery holds promise for sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2015. Atlanta, GA. 2015; http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/allcancerfactsfigures/. Accessed January 21, 2016.

  2. Weaver KE, Rowland JH, Alfano CM, McNeel TS (2010) Parental cancer and the family: a population-based estimate of the number of US cancer survivors residing with their minor children. Cancer 116(18):4395A4401. doi:10.1002/cncr.25368

  3. Fann JR, Thomas-Rich AM, Katon WJ, Cowley D, Pepping M, McGregor BA, Gralow J (2008) Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 30(2):112–126. DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.10.008

  4. Compas BE, Worsham NL, Epping-Jordan JE, Grant KE, Mireault G, Howell DC, Malcarne VL (1994) When mom or dad has cancer: markers of psychological distress in cancer patients, spouses, and children. Health Psychol 13(6):507–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Compas BE, Worsham NL, Ey S, Howell DC (1996) When mom or dad has cancer: II. Coping, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress in children of cancer patients. Health Psychol 15(3):167–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown RT, Fuemmeler B, Anderson D, Jamieson S, Simonian S, Hall RK, Brescia F (2007) Adjustment of children and their mothers with breast cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 32(3):297–308. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsl015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigal JJ, Perry JC, Robbins JM, Gagne MA, Nassif E (2003) Maternal preoccupation and parenting as predictors of emotional and behavioral problems in children of women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(6):1155–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis FM (2011) Therapy for parental cancer and dependent children. In: Watson M, Kissane D (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy in cancer care. Wiley, NY, pp. 225–234

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Vannatta K, Ramsey RR, Noll RB, Gerhardt CA (2010) Associations of child adjustment with parent and family functioning: comparison of families of women with and without breast cancer. J Dev Behav Pediatr 31(1):9–16. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181c82a44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson M, St James-Roberts I, Ashley S et al (2006) Factors associated with emotional and behavioural problems among school age children of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 94(1):43–50. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rauch PK, Muriel AC (2004) The importance of parenting concerns among patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 49(1):37–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Behar L, Lewis FM (2015) Single parents coping with cancer and children. In: Christ G, Messner C, Behar L (eds) Handbook of oncology social work. Oxford University Press, NY, pp. 429–441

    Google Scholar 

  13. Issel LM, Ersek M, Lewis FM (1990) How children cope with mother’s breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 17(3 Suppl):5–12 

  14. Zahlis EH, Lewis FM (1999) Mother’s story of the school-age child’s experience with the mother’s breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 16(2):25–43. doi:10.1300/J077V16N02_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huizinga GA, van der Graaf WT, Visser A, Dijkstra JS, Hoekstra-Weebers JE (2003) Psychosocial consequences for children of a parent with cancer: a pilot study. Cancer Nurs 26(3):195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson E, While D (2002) Children’s adjustment during the first year of a parent’s cancer diagnosis. J Psychosoc Oncol 20(1):15–36. doi:10.1300/J077v20n01_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Visser A, Huizinga GA, Hoekstra HJ et al (2005) Emotional and behavioural functioning of children of a parent diagnosed with cancer: a cross-informant perspective. Psycho oncology 14(9):746–758. doi:10.1002/pon.902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkatraman S, Lewis FM (2012) Preliminary testing of a standardized, self-report measure of children’s attributed cancer-related concerns. New Orleans, LA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zahlis EH (2001) The child’s worries about the mother’s breast cancer: sources of distress in school-age children. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(6):1019–1025

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Armsden GC, Lewis FM (1993) The child’s adaptation to parental medical illness: theory and clinical implications. Patient Educ Couns 22(3):153–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armsden GC, Lewis FM (1994) Behavioral adjustment and self-esteem of school-age children of women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 21(1):39–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis FM (2010) The family’s “stuck points” in adjusting to cancer. In: Holland JC et al (eds) Psycho-oncology. Oxford University Press, Oxford : NY, pp. 511–515

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis FM, Behar LC, Anderson KH, Shands ME, Zahlis EH, Darby E, Sinsheimer JA (2000) Blowing away the myths about the child’s experience with the mother’s breast cancer. In: Baider L, Cooper CL, De-Nour AK (eds) Cancer and the family. Wiley, NY, pp. 201–221

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis FM, Brandt PA, Cochrane BB et al (2015) The Enhancing Connections Program: a six-state randomized clinical trial of a cancer parenting program. J Consult Clin Psychol 83(1):12–23. doi:10.1037/a0038219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins WA, Harris M, and Susman A (1995) Parenting during middle childhood. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

  26. Collins WA, Laursen B (2004) Changing relationships, changing youth: interpersonal contexts of adolescent development. The Journal of Early Adolescence 24(1):55–62. doi:10.1177/0272431603260882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lerner RM, Castellino D, Terry P, Villarruel F, McKinney M (1995) Developmental contextual perspective on parenting. In: Bornstein M (ed) Handbook of parenting: volume 2: biology and ecology of parenting. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, pp. 285–309

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31(2):143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Conerly RC, Baker F, Dye J, Douglas CY, Zabora J (2002) Measuring depression in African American cancer survivors: the reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Study—Depression (CES-D) Scale. J Health Psychol 7(1):107–114. doi:10.1177/1359105302007001658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Given C, Given B, Rahbar M et al (2004) Does a symptom management intervention affect depression among cancer patients: results from a clinical trial. Psycho-Oncology 13(11):818–830. doi:10.1002/pon.807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P (1999) Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). J Psychosom Res 46(5):437–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ, Owen AE, Marsh BJ (1999) Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In: Maruish ME (ed) The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: instruments for adults. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 993–1021

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ellison ES (1985) A multidimensional, dual-perspective index of parental support. West J Nurs Res 7(4):401–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

  37. West BT, Welch KB, Galecki AT (2007) Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Leeuw J, Meijer E (2008) Introduction to multilevel analysis. In: De Leeuw J, Meijer E (eds) Handbook of multilevel analysis. Springer, NY

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Lewis FM, Deal LW (1995) Balancing our lives: a study of the married couple’s experience with breast cancer recurrence. Oncol Nurs Forum 22(6):943–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. PEW Research Center, Internet, Science & Technology. Internet survey: internet users demographics, January 4–14, 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, under award numbers R03 CA 178 488 and R01 CA 78 424. The content of the manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of [alphabetical] Tessa Floyd, Jonika Hash, Alicia M. Korkowski, Victor L. Martin, and Weichao Yuwen. The authors dedicate this paper to the families who participated in this study, our greatest teachers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frances Marcus Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial relationship with the funding organization that sponsored the research. The senior author has full control of all the primary data and agrees to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, F.M., Griffith, K.A., Walker, A. et al. The Enhancing Connections-Telephone study: a pilot feasibility test of a cancer parenting program. Support Care Cancer 25, 615–623 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3448-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3448-z

Keywords

Navigation