Skip to main content
Log in

No man’s land: information needs and resources of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of men treated for prostate cancer will eventually develop castrate-resistant disease (CRPC) with metastases (mCRPC). There are several options for further treatment: chemotherapy, third-line hormone therapy, radium, immunotherapy, and palliation. Current ASCO guidelines for survivors of prostate cancer recommend that an individual’s information needs at all stages of disease are assessed and that patients are provided with or referred to the appropriate sources for information and support. Earlier reviews have highlighted the dearth of such services and we wished to see if the situation had improved more recently. Unfortunately, we conclude that there is still a lack of good-quality congruent information easily accessible specifically for men with mCRPC and insufficient data regarding the risks, harms, and benefits of different management plans. More research providing a clear evidence base about treatment consequences using patient reported outcome measures is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. (2010) Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet 376:1147–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berthold DR et al. (2008) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. JCO 26(2):242–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kantoff P, Higano CS (2012) Integration of immunotherapy into the management of advanced prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 30:S41–S47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. (2011) Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1995–2005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins V, Fallowfield LJ, Poole K (2001) Are members of multidisciplinary teams in breast cancer aware of each other's informational roles? Quality in Health Care 10(2):70–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams E, Boulton M, Watson E (2009) The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns 77(2):179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy B (2011) Family members of patients with cancer: what they know, how they know and what they want to know. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15:428–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care 24(5):618–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren E, Footman K, Tinelli M, et al. (2014) Do cancer-specific websites meet patient’s information needs? Patient Education and Counselling 95:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finney-Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, et al. (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Ed Coun 57:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, et al. (2010) The supportive care needs of family members of men with advanced prostate cancer. Can Oncol Nurs J 20:166–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, et al. (2011) The supportive care needs of men with advanced prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 38:189–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carter N, Miller PA, Murphy BR, et al. (2014) Healthcare providers’ perspectives of the supportive care needs of men with advanced prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 41:421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Basch E (2010) The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. N Engl J Med 362(10):865–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner S, Maher EJ, Young T, et al. (1996) What are the information priorities for cancer patients involved in treatment decisions? An experienced surrogate study in Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer 73:222–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis LM, Bernstein DS, Voest EE, et al. (2014) American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes. 32(12):1277–1280

  17. Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Dafni U, et al. (2015) A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Ann Oncol 26(8):1547–1573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank pH Associates for the administrative support and Sanofi for funding this scoping exercise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Jenkins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Jenkins and Professor Fallowfield’s group received funding from Ph Associates and Sanofi UK to conduct a scoping exercise in the area of mCRPC. The funders had no role in the research, literature review, or writing of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jenkins, V.A., Fallowfield, L.J. No man’s land: information needs and resources of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 24, 4471–4473 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3358-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3358-0

Keywords

Navigation