Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Polypharmacy in the terminal stage of cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstracts

Purpose

This study aims to determine the numbers of patients with advanced cancer receiving polypharmacy at the end of their lives and analyze differences in drug prescription at a general oncology ward and a dedicated palliative care ward.

Methods

A retrospective single-center cohort study at a university hospital with a large cancer center was conducted. The charts of 100 patients who had died because of advanced cancer were reviewed; data concerning sociodemographic variables and medications were collected at four predefined time points (9, 6, 3, 0 days before death).

Results

Nine days before death, polypharmacy was registered in 95 % of patients; they had prescriptions for 11 (9–13) different medications per day (median, IQR). Although this number dropped significantly, on the last day as many as 61 % of the patients were still taking more than 4 drugs (median 6.5, IQR 4–9). No significant difference was noted between the oncology ward and the palliative care ward. Polypharmacy was largely dependent on the patients’ ECOG performance status as well as the type of ward, the number of days before death, and age. It was not influenced by gender, the duration of hospital stays, and the devices facilitating drug administration. The medications fulfilled the requirements of palliative care in the majority of patients; 90 % received treatment for pain and anxiety. Patients treated at the palliative ward received more opioids and psychoactive drugs while those at the oncology ward received more anti-cancer drugs and fluids.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy still is a problem in the large majority of patients with terminal cancer. Further studies should be focused on the patients’ quality of life, drug interactions, and adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L et al (2002) Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey. JAMA 287:337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merlis S, Sheppard C, Collins L, Fiorentino D (1970) Polypharmacy in psychiatry: patterns of differential treatment. Am J Psychiatry 126:1647–1651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cullen SC (1957) Polypharmacy in anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 104:113–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant-Whyte H (1961) Irrational polypharmacy in anaesthesia. S Afr Med J 35:1016–1021

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. (1966) Patients and polypharmacy. Can Med Assoc J 94:456.

  6. Veehof L, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp F, Jong BM (2000) The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study. Fam Pract 17:261–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM et al (2012) Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 65:989–995. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.02.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jyrkkä J, Vartiainen L, Hartikainen S et al (2006) Increasing use of medicines in elderly persons: a five-year follow-up of the Kuopio 75+Study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 62:151–158. doi:10.1007/s00228-005-0079-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW et al (2008) Polypharmacy: misleading, but manageable. Clin Interv Aging 3:383–389

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P et al (2011) Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over a three-year period in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20:514–522. doi:10.1002/pds.2116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hajjar ER, Hanlon JT, Sloane RJ et al (2005) Unnecessary drug use in frail older people at hospital discharge. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1518–1523. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53523.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maggiore RJ, Gross CP, Hurria A (2010) Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer. Oncologist 15:507–522. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. LeBlanc TW, McNeil MJ, Kamal AH et al (2015) Polypharmacy in patients with advanced cancer and the role of medication discontinuation. Lancet Oncol 16:e333–e341. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00080-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg RM, Mabee J, Chan L, Wong S (1996) Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in the ED: analysis of a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med 14:447–450. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90147-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamura BK, Bell CL, Inaba M, Masaki KH (2012) Outcomes of polypharmacy in nursing home residents. Clin Geriatr Med 28:217–236. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Popa MA, Wallace KJ, Brunello A et al (2014) Potential drug interactions and chemotoxicity in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. J Geriatr Oncol 5:307–314. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2014.04.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Leeuwen RWF, Swart EL, Boom FA et al (2010) Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among ambulatory cancer patients: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method. BMC Cancer 10:679. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J (2007) The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J 9:430–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lees J, Chan A (2011) Polypharmacy in elderly patients with cancer: clinical implications and management. Lancet Oncol 12:1249–1257. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70040-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riechelmann RP, Krzyzanowska MK, O’Carroll A, Zimmermann C (2007) Symptom and medication profiles among cancer patients attending a palliative care clinic. Support Care Cancer 15:1407–1412. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0253-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frechen S, Zoeller A, Ruberg K et al (2012) Drug interactions in dying patients: a retrospective analysis of hospice inpatients in Germany. Drug Saf 35:745–758. doi:10.2165/11631280-000000000-00000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nauck F, Ostgathe C, Klaschik E et al (2004) Drugs in palliative care: results from a representative survey in Germany. Palliat Med 18:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundy E, McMullan D, McShane P et al (2013) Polypharmacy and drug omissions across hospices in Northern Ireland. J Palliat Med 16:1446–1449. doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.0090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McLean S, Sheehy-Skeffington B, O’Leary N, O’Gorman A (2013) Pharmacological management of co-morbid conditions at the end of life: is less more? Ir J Med Sci 182:107–112. doi:10.1007/s11845-012-0841-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sera L, McPherson ML, Holmes HM (2014) Commonly prescribed medications in a population of hospice patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 31:126–131. doi:10.1177/1049909113476132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Currow DC, Stevenson JP, Abernethy AP et al (2007) Prescribing in palliative care as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:590–595. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01124.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the dedicated work and cooperation of the staff at the oncology and palliative care wards of the Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina A. Kierner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

None

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 92 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 87 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kierner, K.A., Weixler, D., Masel, E.K. et al. Polypharmacy in the terminal stage of cancer. Support Care Cancer 24, 2067–2074 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3007-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3007-z

Keywords

Navigation