Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer survivors’ post-surgery sexual problems are well documented and long lasting. Partners’ distress in this context leads to psychological morbidity which is poorly understood. Given the prevalence of prostate cancer diagnoses in older men, partners’ distress represents a public health concern. This study elucidates an important aspect of partners’ distress which has hitherto been undocumented. It can lead to further research and health-care provisions that will support couples in prostate cancer survivorship towards improved mental health and health outcomes.
Purpose
Partner sexual function has been viewed as a factor in men’s erectile function recovery after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. However, patients’ and partners’ perceptions on the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery has not been studied. We wanted to understand those perceptions and to see whether their perceptions were congruent.
Methods
Men and partners were recruited from a previous study and interviewed separately about the role of the partner. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory with the help of NVivo software.
Results
Ten men and nine partners participated; most were more than 1 year past surgery. Men were 62, and partners were 58 years old on average. Nine men had erectile dysfunction. Six female partners were post-menopausal, and a participating male partner had post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction. Men and partners agreed that partners provide emotional and logistical support. Both perceived the partner’s own sexual interest, not function, as critical to the couple’s sexual recovery. Some men felt pressured by partners’ initiative, feeling insecure about sexual performance. Men were unaware of partners’ sexual needs or needs for support. Partners expressed those needs but were unsure of what kind of support they needed.
Conclusion
Partners’ sexual and support needs during couples’ sexual recovery after prostatectomy should be acknowledged and addressed as a legitimate aspect of research and care for men recovering from prostatectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Given BA, Northouse L (2011) Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer? Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(5):451–2
Palapattu GS et al (2004) Assessment of perioperative psychological distress in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 172:1814–1817
Northouse L et al (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–34
Couper J (2006) W., et al., Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 15(11):937–53
Bruun P et al (2011) The lonely female partner: a central aspect of prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 31(5):294–9
Thomas KS, Bower JE, Williamson TJ, Hoyt MA, Wellisch D, Stanton AL, Irwin M (2012) Post-traumatic disorder symptoms and blunted diurnal cortisol production in partners of prostate cancer patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37(8):1181–90. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.12.008
Tanner T, Galbraith M, Hays L (2011) From a woman’s perspective: life as a partner of a prostate cancer survivor. J Midwifery Womens Health 56(2):154–60
Navon L, Morag A (2003) Advanced prostate cancer patients’ ways of coping with the hormonal therapy’s effect on body, sexuality, and spousal ties. Qual Health Res 13(10):1378–92
Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86(7):834–9
Chambers SK et al (2013) Couple distress after localised prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(11):2967–76
Sanda MG et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–61
Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D (2007) Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. J Sex Med 4(5):1394–403
Moskovic DJ et al (2010) The female factor: predicting compliance with a post-prostatectomy erectile preservation program. J Sex Med 7(11):3659–65
Shindel A et al (2005) Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2(6):833–41, discussion 841
Schover LR et al (2011) A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 118(2):500–9
Schover LR et al (2002) Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 95(8):1773–85
Sanders S et al (2006) Couples surviving prostate cancer: Long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 10(4):503–8
Ramsey SD et al (2013) Impact of prostate cancer on sexual relationships: a longitudinal perspective on intimate partners’ experiences. J Sex Med 10(12):3135–43
Jemal A et al (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):277–300
Wittmann D et al (2013) A one-day couple group intervention to enhance sexual recovery for surgically treated men with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. Urol Nurs 33(3):140–7
Canada AL et al (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12):2689–700
Davison BJ et al (2005) Development and evaluation of a prostate sexual rehabilitation clinic: a pilot project. BJU Int 96(9):1360–4
WHO, S.H.D.S (2002) Defining sexual health: a report of a technical consultation on sexual health. 28-31 January, 2002. World Health Organization, Sexual Health Document Series
Parkes CM (1971) Psycho-social transitions: a field for study. Soc Sci Med 5(2):101–15
Wittmann D, Foley S, Balon R (2011) A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: the role of grief and mourning. J Sex Marital Ther 37(2):130–44
Wittmann D, et al (2013) A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples’ sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. Epub ahead of publication
Charmaz K (2006) Construction grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi
LaRossa R (2005) Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. J Marriage Fam 67(4):837–857
NVivo 9. 2012, QSR International (Americas) Inc., 55 Cambridge Street, Burlington, MA 01803 USA
Reese JB et al (2010) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer 18(7):785–800
Manne S, Badr H (2008) Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer 112(11 Suppl):2541–55
Evertsen JM, Wolkenstein AS (2010) Female partners of patients after surgical prostate cancer treatment: interactions with physicians and support needs. BMC Fam Pract 11:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-11-19
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Healthcare Research (MICHR) Pilot and Collaborative Grant Program UL1RR024986 and by the American Cancer Society Doctoral Training Grant in Social Work DSW-10-098-023-SW.
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have a financial relationship with these entities. The authors have full control of the data, and the dataset is available for review if needed. Daniela Wittmann owns $4,000 in Pfizer stock. James Montie is on the Advisory Board of Histosonics, Inc. Ted Skolarus is a paid consultant for ArborMetrix, Inc., for work related to patient-centered communication tools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The study was approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board, and all participants signed an informed consent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wittmann, D., Carolan, M., Given, B. et al. Exploring the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 22, 2509–2515 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2244-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2244-x