Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The treatment of lymphedema related to breast cancer: a systematic review and evidence summary

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

To provide an evidence summary report on the question: What are the treatment options for women with lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer?

Methods

Cancer Care Ontario’s Supportive Care Guidelines Group (SCGG) employed systematic review methodology to produce an evidence summary on this topic. Evidence-based opinions were formulated to guide clinical decision making, and a formal external review process was conducted to validate the relevance of these opinions for Ontario practitioners.

Results

The systematic review search strategy identified ten randomized controlled trials which form the basis of this evidence summary report. Four key opinions offered by the SCGG are outlined below. Responses from the practitioner feedback process supported the validity of these opinions in Ontario. (1) There is some evidence to suggest that compression therapy and manual lymphatic drainage may improve established lymphedema, but further studies are needed. Compression garments should be worn from morning to night and be removed at bedtime. Patients should be advised that lymphedema is a lifelong condition and that compression garments must be worn on a daily basis. Patients can expect stabilization and/or modest improvement of edema with the use of the garment in the prescribed fashion. (2) There is no current evidence to support the use of medical therapies, including diuretics. (3) Additional efforts to define relevant clinical outcomes for the assessment of patients with lymphedema would be valuable. (4) These opinions are appropriate for patients with more than mild lymphedema, where the signs and symptoms are considered significant from the patients’ perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two additional clinical practice guidelines, one by the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG) on surgical management of breast cancer, and one by the National Breast Cancer Centre in Australia on management of early breast cancer surgery, were identified online at the time of our search but are no longer electronically accessible.

References

  1. Anderson L, Hojris I, Erlandsen M, et al (2000) Treatment of breast-cancer-related lymphedema with or without manual lymphatic drainage: a randomized study. Acta Oncol 39:399–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badger C, Seers K, Preston N, et al (2002) Physical therapies for reducing and controlling lymphoedema of the limbs (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford

  3. Bertelli G, Venturini M, Forno G, et al (1991) Conservative treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema: a controlled, randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2:575–578

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchard DK, Donohue JH, Reynolds C, et al (2003) Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Surg 138:482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Browman GP, Levine MN, Mohide EA, et al (1995) The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol 13:502–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Browning C (1997) The management of lymphoedema. In: Redman S, Pillar C, Turner J, Boyle F (eds) Lymphoedema: prevalence, risk factors and management: a review of research. NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, Sydney

  7. Casley-Smith JR, Morgan RG, Piller NB (1993) Treatment of lymphedema of the arms and legs with 5,6-benzo-pyrone. N Engl J Med 329:1158–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dini D, Del Mastro L, Gozz A, et al (1998) The role of pneumatic compression in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema. A randomized phase III study. Ann Oncol 9:187–191

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson VS, Pearson ML, Ganz PA, et al (2001) Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:96–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Golshan M, Martin WJ, Dowlatshahi K (2003) Sentinel lymph node biopsy lowers the rate of lymphedema when compared with standard axillary lymph node dissection. Am Surg 69:209–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris SR, Hugi MR, Olivotto IA, et al, for the Steering Committee for Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer (2001) Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 11. Lymphedema. CMAJ 164:191–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoe AL, Iven D, Royle GT, et al (1992) Incidence of arm swelling following axillary clearance for breast cancer. Br J Surg 79:261–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hornsby R (1995) The use of compression to treat lymphoedema. Prof Nurs 11:127–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Howell D, Ezzo J, Tuppo K, et al (2002) Complete decongestive therapy for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford

  15. Jacobson JS, Workman SB, Kronenberg F (2000) Research on complementary/alternative medicine for patients with breast cancer: a review of the biomedical literature. J Clin Oncol 18:668–683

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jani AB, Basu A, Heimann R, et al (2003) Sentinel lymph node versus axillary lymph node dissection for early-stage breast carcinoma: a comparison using a utility-adjusted number needed to treat analysis. Cancer 97:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johansson K, Lie E, Ekdahl C, et al (1998) A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology 31:56–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kissin MW, Querci della Roveret G, Easton D, et al (1986) Risk of lymphoedema following the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Surg 73:680–684

    Google Scholar 

  19. Logan V (1995) Incidence and prevalence of lymphedema: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 4:213–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loprinzi CL, Kugler JW, Sloan JA, et al (1999) Lack of effect of coumarin in women with lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:346–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Markowski J, Wilcox J, Helm P (1981) Lymphedema incidence after specific postmastectomy therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 62:449–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Megens A, Harris SR (1998) Physical therapist management of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: a critical review of its effectiveness. Phys Ther 78:1302–1311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oncology Nursing Society (1998) Manual for radiation oncology nursing practice and education. Oncology Nursing Press, Pittsburgh, PA (summary at http://www.ons.org/xp6/ONS/Library.xml/ONS_Publications.xml/Book_Excerpts.xml/ManualRadiationOncology/FrontPage.xml)

  24. Pain SJ, Purushotham AD (2000) Lymphoedema following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg 87:1128–1141

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pecking A, Lasry S, Boudinet A, et al (1988) Post surgical physiotherapeutic treatment: interest in secondary upper limb lymphedemas prevention. Prog Lymphology 11:562–564

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pecking AP, Fevrier B, Wargon C, et al (1997) Efficacy of Daflon 500 mg in the treatment of lymphedema (secondary to conventional therapy of breast cancer). Angiology 48:93–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piller NB, Morgan RG, Casley-Smith JR (1988) A double-blind, cross-over trial of O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides (benzopyrones) in the treatment of the arms and legs. Br J Plast Surg 41:20–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramos SM, O’Donnell LS, Knight G (1999) Edema volume, not timing, is the key to success in lymphedema treatment. Am J Surg 178:311–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schijven MP, Vingerhoets AJ, Rutten HJ, et al (2003) Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:341–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (1998) Breast cancer in women (publication no. 29). http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sign/guidelines/fulltext/29/index.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Supportive Care Guidelines Group would like to thank Ms. Lyn Kligman, Dr. Rebecca Wong, Ms. Mary Johnston, and Ms. Nancy Laetsch for taking the lead in drafting and revising this evidence summary report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca K. S. Wong.

Additional information

A complete list of Supportive Care Guidelines Group members is available at: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/access_1222.htm.

This work is presented on behalf of the members of the Supportive Care Guidelines Group of Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-based Care. A complete list of the members is available at http://www.cancercare.on.ca/access_1222.htm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kligman, L., Wong, R.K.S., Johnston, M. et al. The treatment of lymphedema related to breast cancer: a systematic review and evidence summary. Support Care Cancer 12, 421–431 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0627-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0627-0

Keywords

Navigation