Skip to main content
Log in

A study of phase transitions for convergence analysis of spin glasses: application to portfolio selection problems

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, the spin glass paradigm has been gainfully used in solving a number of optimization problems by devising a mapping between our understanding of spin interactions within a natural spin glass and the given optimization problems. Among the determining factors in a natural spin glass, phase transition is a physical phenomenon that is controlled by temperature. Depending on the spin glass’s phase, spin glasses behave differently and may or may not reach the globally desired optimum. This study aims to determine this critical temperature below which convergence to a global optimum is more likely. Furthermore, we aim to determine the main parameters that characterize this critical temperature. Specifically, the critical temperature is studied as applied to the portfolio selection problem. It is shown that below the critical temperature, the glass consistently reaches the optimal states, whereas, convergence to optimum becomes increasingly unlikely if temperature exceeds this critical temperature. Application to five of the world’s major financial markets reveals that the critical temperature is directly proportional to covariance and the average return of assets and does not depend on the number of assets. In other words, all stock markets, that have the same asset covariance and average return, also have the same critical temperature. This is confirmed by several empirical tests such as correlation, entropy and hamming distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackley DH, Hinton GE, Sejnowski TJ (1985) A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cogn Sci 9:147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam Y (1997) Dynamics of Complex Systems. Addison Wesley Longman Inc., Amsterdam, pp 146–180

  • Bar-Yam Y (2005) About Engineering Complex Systems: Multiscale Analysis and Evolutionary Engineering. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 16–31

  • Berthier L, Young AP (2004) Time and length scales in spin glasses. J Phys Condens Matter 16:S729–S734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher S (1999) Extremal Optimization of graph partitioning at the percolation threshold. J Phys A Math Gen 32:5201–5211

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher S (2004) Extremal optimization at the phase transition of the 3-coloring problem. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69(6 Pt 2):066703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolthausen E, Bovier A (2007) “Spin Glasses,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Bulatov AA, Skvortsov ES (2008) “Phase transition for Local Search on planted SAT,” arXiv:0811.2546v1

  • Ciliberti S, Mezard M (2007) Risk minimization through portfolio replication. Europ Phy J B 57:175–180

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coppersmith D, Gamarnik D, Hajiaghayi M, Sorkin GB (2003) Random max sat, random max cut, and their phase transitions. J Rand Struct Algorithm 24(4):502–545

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor A, Kondor I (1999) Portfolio with nonlinear constraints and spin glasses. Phys A 274:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galluccio S, Bouchaud JP, Potters M (1998) Rational decisions, random matrices and spin glasses. J Phy A 259:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent IP, Walsh T (1996) The TSP phase transition. Artif Intell 88:349–358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann AK, Rieger H (2002) “Optimization Algorithms in Physics,” Wiley-VCH Verlag Co, Cambridge

  • Hartmann AK, Weigt M (2005) “Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Basics, Algorithms and Statistical Mechanics,” Wiley-VCH Verlag Co, Cambridge

  • Hinton GE, Sejnowski TJ, Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Learning and Relearning in Boltzmann Machines. Cambridge MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 282–317

  • Horiguchi T, Takahashi H, Hayashi K, Yamaguchi C (2004) Ising model for packet routing control. J Phy Lett A 330:192–197

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubermann BA, Hogg T (1987) Phase transitions in artificial intelligence systems. J Artif Intell 33:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingber L (1993) Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory. Math Comput Model 18(11):29–57

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lotov AV (2005) Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier in the Framework of Classical Approach to Multi-Objective Optimization. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04461, Practical Approaches to Multi-Objective Optimization, pp 235

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio Selection. J Finan 7:77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij JM, Kappen HJ (2004) Spin-glass phase transitions on real-world graphs. arXiv:0408378v2

  • Nishimori H (2001) Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing: An introduction. Clarendon press Oxford, Oxford

  • Nishimori H (2007) Spin glasses and information. Phys A 384:94–99

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nordblad Per (2004) Spin glasses: model systems for non-equilibrium dynamics. J Phys Condens Matter 16:S715–S722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar P (2000) A brief history of cellular automata. ACM Comput Surv 32(1):80–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN (2008) “Introduction to Genetic Algorithms,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Vafaei Jahan M, Akbarzadeh-T MR (2010) From local search to global conclusions: migrating spin glass-based distributed portfolio selection. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 14(2):591–601

  • Vafaei Jahan M, Akbarzadeh Totonchi MR (2012a) Composing local and global behavior: higher performance of spin glass based portfolio selection. J Comput Sci 3(4):238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafaei Jahan M, Akbarzadeh Totonchi MR (2012b) Extremal optimization vs. learning automata: strategies for spin selection in portfolio selection problems. Appl Soft Comput 12(10):3276–3284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waelbroeck H, Zertuche F (1999) Discrete chaos. J Phys A Math Gen 32(1):175–189

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Landau DP (2001) An efficient, multiple range random walk algorithm to calculate the density of states. Phys Rev Lett 86(10):2050–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portfolio selection benchmark data at http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/orlib/portinfo.html

  • Young AP (2007) Phase transitions in spin glasses. J Magn Magn Mater 310:1482–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Korf R (1996) A study of complexity transitions on the asymmetric traveling salesman problem. J Artif Intell 81(2):223–239

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Vafaei Jahan.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jahan, M.V., Akbarzadeh-T, MR. & Shahtahamassbi, N. A study of phase transitions for convergence analysis of spin glasses: application to portfolio selection problems. Soft Comput 17, 1883–1892 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1025-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1025-7

Keywords

Navigation