Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for deterministic chaos in long-term high-resolution karstic streamflow time series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major challenges in hydrology consists in the conception of models to predict runoff evolution in time, as this is of crucial importance in water resource assessment and management. These models are required to provide estimations of high flows and low flows, so that appropriate short-term (flood) emergency measures and long-term (drought) management activities can be undertaken. However, due to the inherent nonlinearity of climate inputs (e.g. rainfall) and the heterogeneous nature of watersheds, understanding and modeling the catchment hydrologic response is tremendously challenging. This is particularly the case for karstic watersheds that are generally highly nonlinear and also sensitive to initial conditions. Investigation of the dynamic nature of hydrologic response is an important first step towards developing reliable models for such watersheds. To this end, this study examines the dynamic nature of streamflow discharge from karstic watersheds, especially the short-term variations. A nonlinear dynamic method, the correlation dimension method, is employed to unique long, continuous, and high-resolution (30-min) streamflow data from two karstic watersheds in the Pyrénées Mountains (Ariège) of France: the Aliou spring and the Baget spring. The results reveal the presence of deterministic chaos in the streamflow dynamics of the two watersheds, with attractor dimension values below 3. These results have great significance regarding the presence of deterministic chaos in karstic flows and in the issue of data size regarding chaos studies in hydrology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarbanel HDI, Brown R, Kadtke JB (1990) Prediction in chaotic nonlinear systems: Methods for time series with broadband Fourier spectra. Phys Rev A 41(4):1782–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshorbagy A, Simonovic SP, Panu US (2002) Estimation of missing streamflow data using principles of chaos theory. J Hydrol 255(1–4):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AM, Swinney HL (1986) Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys Rev A 33(2):1134–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasberger P, Proccacia I (1983) Measuring the strangeness pf strange attractors. Phys D 9:189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hense A (1987) On the possible existence of a strange attractor for the southern oscillation. Beitr Phys Atmos 60(1):34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzfuss J, Mayer-Kress G (1986) An approach to error-estimation in the application of dimension algorithms. In: Mayer-Kress G (ed) Dimensions and entropies in chaotic systems. Springer, New York, pp 114–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MN, Sivakumar B (2002) Characterization and prediction of runoff dynamics: a nonlinear dynamical view. Adv Water Resour 25(2):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, Lai F (1994) Analysis and prediction of chaos in rainfall and streamflow time series. J Hydrol 153:23–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, Xu PC, Li WK (2010) Modified correlation entropy estimation for a noisy chaotic time series. Chaos 20:023104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyoung MS, Kim HS, Sivakumar B, Singh VP, Ahn KS (2011) Dynamic characteristics of monthly rainfall in the Korean peninsula under climate change. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(4):613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part I: convolution and spectral analyses. J Hydrol 238(3–4):123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Masbou J, Beaulieu E, Mangin A (2011) Scaling behavior of the fluctuations in streamflow at the outlet of karstic watersheds, France. J Hydrol 410(3):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai YC, Lerner D (1998) Effective scaling regime for computing the correlation dimension from chaotic time series. Phys D 115:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrakis N, Andreou AS, Polydoropoulos P, Georgopoulos E, Bountis T (2000) Nonlinear analysis and forecasting of a brackish karstic spring. Water Resour Res 36(4):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin A (1984) Pour une meilleure connaissance des systèmes hydrologiques à partir des analyses corrélatoires et spectrales. J Hydrol 67:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerenberg MAH, Essex C (1990) Correlation dimension and systematic geometric effects. Phys Rev A 42(12):7065–7074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng WW, Panu US, Lennox WC (2007) Chaos based analytical techniques for daily extreme hydrological observations. J Hydrol 342:17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne AR, Provenzale A (1989) Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra. Phys D 35:357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard NH, Crutchfield JP, Farmer JD, Shaw RS (1980) Geometry from a time series. Phys Rev Lett 45:712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack GB (1999) Does the river run wild? Assessing chaos in hydrological systems. Adv Water Resour 23(3):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regonda S, Sivakumar B, Jain A (2004) Temporal scaling in river flow: can it be chaotic? Hydrol Sci J 49(3):373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe I, De Power FB, Sharifi MB, Georgakakos KP (1989) Chaos in rainfall. Water Resour Res 25(7):1667–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD, Kim HS, Eykholt R, Burlando P, Green TR (2005) Aggregation and sampling in deterministic chaos: implications for chaos identification in hydrological processes. Nonlinear Process Geophys 12:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schertzer D, Tchiguirinskaia I, Lovejoy S, Hubert P, Bendjoudi H et al (2002) Which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process? A discussion on ‘Evidence of chaos in the rainfall-runoff process’ by Sivakumar. Hydrol Sci J 47(1):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber T, Kantz H (1996) Observing and predicting chaotic signals: is 2%noise too much? In: Kravtsov YuA, Kadtke JB (eds) Predictability of complex dynamical systems. Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin, pp 43–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster HG (1988) Deterministic chaos. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B (2000) Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations. J Hydrol 227:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B (2004) Chaos theory in geophysics: past, present and future. Chaos Solitons Fractals 19(2):441–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B (2005) Correlation dimension estimation of hydrologic series and data size requirement: myth and reality. Hydrol Sci J 50(4):591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B (2009) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in hydrologic systems: latest developments and a look forward. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:1027–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B, Singh VP (2012) Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4119–4131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B, Berndtsson R, Olsson J, Jinno K et al (2002a) Reply to ‘which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process?’ by Schertzer. Hydrol Sci J 47(1):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B, Persson M, Berndtsson R, Uvo CB (2002b) Is correlation dimension a reliable indicator of low-dimensional chaos in short hydrological time series? Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2001WR000333

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehlik J (1999) Deterministic chaos in runoff series. J Hydrol Hydromech 47(4):271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand DA, Young LS (eds) Dynamical systems and turbulence, vol 898., Lecture Notes in MathematicsSpringer, Berlin, pp 366–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J (1990) Estimating the fractal dimension. J Opt Soc Am A 7:1055–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongal H, Berndtsson R (2014) Phase-space reconstruction and self-exciting threshold modeling approach to forecast lake water levels. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28(4):955–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongal H, Demirel MC, Booij MJ (2013) Seasonality of low flows and dominant processes in the Rhine River. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonis AA, Elsner JB (1988) The weather attractor over very short timescales. Nature 333:545–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonis AA, Elsner JB, Georgakakos KP (1993) Estimating the dimension of weather and climate attractors: important issues about the procedure and interpretation. J Atmos Sci 50:2549–2555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Vrijling JK, Van Gelder PHAJM, Mac J (2006) Testing for nonlinearity of streamflow processes at different timescales. J Hydrol 322:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The database benefits from CRITEX Program RBV-SOERE from INSU-CNRS and Aliou and Baget watersheds are part of the French national observatory SO KARST (www.sokarst.org). B. Sivakumar acknowledges the financial support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) through the Future Fellowship Grant (FT110100328).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Labat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labat, D., Sivakumar, B. & Mangin, A. Evidence for deterministic chaos in long-term high-resolution karstic streamflow time series. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 2189–2196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1175-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1175-5

Keywords

Navigation