Abstract
Over the past few decades, energy and water fluxes have been directly measured by a global flux network, which was established by regional and continental network sites based on an eddy covariance (EC) method. Although, the EC method possesses many advantages, its typical data coverage could not exceed 65 % due to various environmental factors including micrometeorological conditions and systematic malfunctions. In this study, four different methodologies were used to fill the gap in latent heat flux (LE) data. These methods were Food and Agriculture Organization Penman–Monteith (FAO_PM) equation, mean diurnal variation (MDV), Kalman filter, and dynamic linear regression (DLR). We used these methods to evaluate two flux towers at different land cover types located at Seolmacheon (SMC) and Cheongmicheon (CMC) in Korea. The LE estimated by four different approaches was a fairly close match to the observed LE, with the root mean square error ranging from 4.81 to 61.88 W m−2 at SMC and from 0.89 to 60.27 W m−2 at CMC. At both sites, the LE estimated by DLR showed the best result with the value of the coefficient of correlation (R), equal to 0.99. Cost-effectiveness analysis for evaluating four different gap-filling methods also confirmed that DLR showed the best cost effectiveness ratio (C/R). The Kalman filter showed the second highest C/R rank except in the winter season at SMC followed by MDV and FAO_PM. Energy closures with estimated LE led to further improved compare to the energy closure of the observed LE. The results showed that the estimated LE at CMC was a better fit with the observed LE than the estimated LE at SMC due to the more complicated topography and land cover at the SMC site. This caused more complex interactions between the surface and the atmosphere. The estimated LE with all approaches used in this study showed improvement in energy closure at both sites. The results of this study suggest that each method can be used as a gap-filling model for LE. However, it is important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each method, the purpose of research, characteristics of the study site, study period and data availability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi N, Warland JS, Berg AA (2006) Filling gaps in evapotranspiration measurements for water budget studies: evaluation of a Kalman filtering approach. Agric For Meteorol 141:57–66
Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–34
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56 FAO, Rome
Amthor JS (1995) Terrestrial higher-plant response to increasing atmospheric (CO2) in relation to the global carbon cycle. Glob Chang Biol 1:243–274
Aubinet M, Vesala T, Papale D (2012) Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer, New York
Baldocchi D et al (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415–2434
Bamberger I, Hörtnagl L, Walser M, Hansel A, Wohlfahrt G (2014) Gap-filling strategies for annual VOC flux data sets. Biogeosciences 11:2429–2442
Bi X et al (2007) Seasonal and diurnal variations in moisture, heat, and CO2 fluxes over grassland in the tropical monsoon region of southern China. J Geophys Res: Atmos 112:D10106. doi:10.1029/2006jd007889
Byun K, Liaqat UW, Choi M (2014) Dual-model approaches for evapotranspiration analyses over homo-and heterogeneous land surface conditions. Agric For Meteorol 197:169–187
Cava D, Contini D, Donateo A, Martano P (2008) Analysis of short-term closure of the surface energy balance above short vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 148:82–93
Chatfield C (2013) The analysis of time series: an introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Chen YY, Chu CR, Li MH (2012) A gap-filling model for eddy covariance latent heat flux: estimating evapotranspiration of a subtropical seasonal evergreen broad-leaved forest as an example. J Hydrol 468–469:101–110
Choi M (2013) Parameterizing daytime downward longwave radiation in two Korean regional flux monitoring network sites. J Hydrol 476:257–264
Choi M, Lee SO, Kwon H (2010) Understanding of the common land model performance for water and energy fluxes in a farmland during the growing season in Korea. Hydrol Process 24:1063–1071
Costa M, Gonçalves AM (2011) Clustering and forecasting of dissolved oxygen concentration on a river basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:151–163
Detto M, Verfaillie J, Anderson F, Xu L, Baldocchi D (2011) Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method. Agric For Meteorol 151:1312–1324
Exner-Kittridge MG, Rains MC (2010) Case study on the accuracy and cost/effectiveness in simulating reference evapotranspiration in West-Central Florida. J Hydrol Eng 15:696–703
Falge E et al (2001) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric For Meteorol 107:43–69
Foken T, Wimmer F, Mauder M, Thomas C, Liebethal C (2006) Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem. Atmos Chem Phys 6:4395–4402
Garcia M, Raes D, Allen R, Herbas C (2004) Dynamics of reference evapotranspiration in the Bolivian highlands (Altiplano). Agric For Meteorol 125:67–82
Göckede M, Rebmann C, Foken T (2004) A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex sites. Agric For Meteorol 127:175–188
Gonçalves AM, Costa M (2013) Predicting seasonal and hydro-meteorological impact in environmental variables modelling via Kalman filtering. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1021–1038
Hansen JE, Sato M, Lacis A, Ruedy R, Tegen I, Matthews E (1998) Climate forcings in the Industrial era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12753–12758
Hollinger DY, Richardson AD (2005) Uncertainty in eddy covariance measurements and its application to physiological models. Tree Physiol 25:873–885
Hong J, Kim J, Lee D, Lim JH (2008) Estimation of the storage and advection effects on H2O and CO2 exchanges in a hilly KoFlux forest catchment. Water Resour Res 44
Hong J, Kwon H, Lim J, Byun Y, Lee J, Kim J (2009) Standardization of KoFlux eddy-covariance data processing. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 11:19–26
Hong J, Takagi K, Ohta T, Kodama Y (2014) Wet surface resistance of forest canopy in monsoon Asia: implications for eddy-covariance measurement of evapotranspiration. Hydrol Process 28:37–42
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jarvis AJ, Stauch VJ, Schulz K, Young PC (2004) The seasonal temperature dependency of photosynthesis and respiration in two deciduous forests. Glob Chang Biol 10:939–950
Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Fluids Eng 82:35–45
Kato T, Tang Y, Gu S, Hirota M, Du M, Li Y, Zhao X (2006) Temperature and biomass influences on interannual changes in CO2 exchange in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Glob Chang Biol 12:1285–1298
Kwon HJ, Lee JH, Lee YK, Lee JW, Jung SW, Kim J (2009) Seasonal variations of evapotranspiration observed in a mixed forest in the Seolmacheon catchment. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 11:39–47
Lee X, Massman WJ (2011) A perspective on thirty years of the Webb, Pearman and Leuning density corrections. Bound-Layer Meteorol 139:37–59
Lee X, Massman W, Law BE (2006) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, vol 29. Springer, New York
Li Z, Yu G, Wen X, Zhang L, Ren C, Fu Y (2005) Energy balance closure at ChinaFLUX sites. Sci China Ser D 48:51–62
Lindroth A, Mölder M, Lagergren F (2010) Heat storage in forest biomass improves energy balance closure. Biogeosciences 7:301–313. doi:10.5194/bg-7-301-2010
Loescher HW, Law BE, Mahrt L, Hollinger DY, Campbell J, Wofsy SC (2006) Uncertainties in, and interpretation of, carbon flux estimates using the eddy covariance technique. J Geophys Res D 111
Mahrt L (1998) Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15:416–429
Massman WJ (2000) A simple method for estimating frequency response corrections for eddy covariance systems. Agric For Meteorol 104:185–198
Mo X, Chen JM, Ju W, Black TA (2008) Optimization of ecosystem model parameters through assimilating eddy covariance flux data with an ensemble Kalman filter. Ecol Model 217:157–173
Moffat AM et al (2007) Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 147:209–232
Novick K, Brantley S, Miniat CF, Walker J, Vose J (2014) Inferring the contribution of advection to total ecosystem scalar fluxes over a tall forest in complex terrain. Agric For Meteorol 185:1–13
Ocana-Peinado F, Valderrama M, Aguilera A (2008) A dynamic regression model for air pollen concentration. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:59–63. doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0153-y
Pagowski M et al (2006) Application of dynamic linear regression to improve the skill of ensemble-based deterministic ozone forecasts. Atmos Environ 40:3240–3250
Papale D (2006) Towards a standardized processing of net ecosystem exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation. Biogeosciences 3:571–583
Samain O, Roujean JL, Geiger B (2008) Use of a Kalman filter for the retrieval of surface BRDF coefficients with a time-evolving model based on the ECOCLIMAP land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 112:1337–1346
Schmid HP (1994) Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes. Bound-Layer Meteorol 67:293–318
Stoy PC et al (2013) A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: the role of landscape scale heterogeneity. Agric For Meteorol 171–172:137–152
Todd RW, Evett SR, Howell TA (2000) The Bowen ratio-energy balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated alfalfa evaluated in a semi-arid, advective environment. Agric For Meteorol 103:335–348
Twine TE et al (2000) Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric For Meteorol 103:279–300
Vickers D, Mahrt L (1997) Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 14:512–526
Vinukollu RK, Wood EF, Ferguson CR, Fisher JB (2011) Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: evaluation of three process-based approaches. Remote Sens Environ 115:801–823
Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100
Whittle P (1953) The analysis of multiple stationary time series. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 125–139
Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Bound-Layer Meteorol 99:127–150
Wilson K et al (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113:223–243
Young PC (1999) Nonstationary time series analysis and forecasting. Prog Environ Sci 1:3–48
Young PC (2011) Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: an introduction for the student and practitioner. Springer, New York
Young PC, Pedregal DJ (1999) Recursive and en-bloc approaches to signal extraction. J Appl Stat 26:103–128
Young PC, Taylor CJ, Tych W, Pedregal DJ (2007) The Captain Toolbox. Centre for Research on Environmental Systems and Statistics The Captain Toolbox Centre for Research on Environmental Systems and Statistics
Yuan R, Kang M, Park S, Hong J, Lee D, Kim J (2007) The effect of coordinate rotation on the eddy covariance flux estimation in a hilly KoFlux forest catchment. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 9:8
Yuan R, Kang M, Park S, Hong J, Lee D, Kim J (2011) Expansion of the planar-fit method to estimate flux over complex terrain. Meteorol Atmos Phys 110:123–133
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Space core technology development program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future planning (NRF-2014M1A3A3A02034789). We would like to thank the Hydrological Survey Center (HSC) for providing flux tower data at SMC and CMC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J., Byun, K., Choi, M. et al. Evaluation of statistical gap fillings for continuous energy flux (evapotranspiration) measurements for two different land cover types. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29, 2021–2035 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1101-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1101-x