Abstract
This paper presents a systemic Bayesian network (BN) based approach for dynamic risk analysis of adjacent buildings in tunneling environments, consisting of risk/hazard identification, BN learning and BN validation. Two validation indicators are proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of the established BN model, aiming to ensure that the model predictions are not significantly different from actual observations. In the dynamic risk analysis framework, the predictive, sensitivity and diagnostic techniques are used to conduct the feed-forward control in the pre-construction stage, intermediate control in the construction stage and back-forward control in the post-accident stage, respectively. A case regarding some existing buildings adjacent to construction of the Wuhan Yangtze metro tunnel in China is presented. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, as well as its application potential. The proposed approach can be used by practitioners in the industry as a decision support tool to provide guidelines on the conservation of adjacent buildings against tunnel-induced damages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson KA, Prion S (2013) Making sense of methods and measurement: measures of central tendency. Clin Simul Nurs 9:617–618
Benke KK, Hamilton AJ (2008) Quantitative microbial risk assessment: uncertainty and measures of central tendency for skewed distributions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:533–539
Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 173:219–239
Cheng CY, Dasari GR, Chow YK, Leung CF (2007) Finite element analysis of tunnel-soil-pile interaction using displacement controlled model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:450–466
Clarke JA, Laefer DF (2014) Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:333–342
Cooper GF, Herskovits E (1992) A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Mach Learn 9:309–347
Cuaya G, Muñoz-Meléndez A, Carrera LN, Morales EF, Quiñones I, Pérez AI, Alessi A (2012) A dynamic Bayesian network for estimating the risk of falls from real gait data. Med Biol Eng Compu 51:29–37
Ding LY, Zhou C (2013) Development of web-based system for safety risk early warning in urban metro construction. Autom Constr 34:45–55
Ding L, Wang F, Luo H, Yu M, Wu X (2013) Feedforward analysis for shield-ground system. J Comput Civ Eng 27:231–242
Finno RJ, Voss FT Jr, Rossow E, Blackburn JT (2005) Evaluating damage potential in buildings affected by excavations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1199–1210
Heckerman D, Geiger D, Chickering DM (1995) Learning Bayesian networks: the combination of knowledge and statistical data. Mach Learn 20:197–243
Henriksen HJ, Rasmussen P, Brandt G, Von Buelow D, Jensen FV (2007) Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ Model Softw 22:1101–1113
Ho DC-W, Chau K-W, King-Chung Cheung A, Yau Y, Wong S-K, Leung H-F, Siu-Yu Lau S, Wong W-S (2008) A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong. Build Environ 43:764–775
Hopfe CJ, Augenbroe GLM, Hensen JLM (2013) Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment. Build Environ 69:81–90
Hsu WH (2004) Genetic wrappers for feature selection in decision tree induction and variable ordering in Bayesian network structure learning. Inf Sci 163:103–122
Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K (2009) Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:600–606
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P (2011) Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:925–932
Kwisthout J (2014) Most frugal explanations in Bayesian Networks. Artif Intell 69:655–681
Langseth H, Portinale L (2007) Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:92–108
Liao SM, Liu JH, Wang RL, Li ZM (2009) Shield tunneling and environment protection in Shanghai soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:454–465
Murphy AH, Winkler RL (1970) Scoring rules in probability assessment and evaluation. Acta Psychol 34:273–286
Mutshinda CM, Antai I, O’Hara RB (2008) A probabilistic approach to exposure risk assessment. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:441–449
Nasirzadeh F, Afshar A, Khanzadi M (2008) Dynamic risk analysis in construction projects. Can J Civ Eng 35:820–831
Neapolitan RE (2004) Learning Bayesian networks. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Oni S, Ko A, Druzdzel MJ, Wasyluk H (2001) Learning Bayesian network parameters from small data sets: application of Noisy-OR gates. Int J Approx Reason 27:165–182
Ou C-Y, Teng F-C, Wang I-W (2008) Analysis and design of partial ground improvement in deep excavations. Comput Geotech 35:576–584
Park HS, Cho SB (2011) Evolutionary attribute ordering in Bayesian networks for predicting the metabolic syndrome. Expert Syst Appl 39:4240–4249
Pearl J (1986) Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artif Intell 29:241–288
Ren J, Jenkinson I, Wang J, Xu D, Yang J (2009) An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 131:1–12
Robertson DE, Wang QJ, Malano H, Etchells T (2009) A Bayesian network approach to knowledge integration and representation of farm irrigation: 2. Model validation. Water Resour Res 45:2410–2423
Shenton W, Hart BT, Chan TU (2014) A Bayesian network approach to support environmental flow restoration decisions in the Yarra River, Australia. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:57–65
Uusitalo L (2007) Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol Model 203:312–318
Yang L, Lee J (2012) Bayesian Belief Network-based approach for diagnostics and prognostics of semiconductor manufacturing systems. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 28:66–74
Yoo C, Lee D (2008) Deep excavation-induced ground surface movement characteristics—a numerical investigation. Comput Geotech 35:231–252
Zhang D, Fang Q, Hou Y, Li P, Yuen Wong LN (2012) Protection of buildings against damages as a result of adjacent large-span tunneling in shallowly buried soft ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:903–913
Zhang L, Wu X, Ding L, Skibniewski MJ (2013a) A novel model for risk assessment of adjacent buildings in tunneling environments. Build Environ 65:185–194
Zhang L, Wu X, Ding L, Skibniewski MJ, Yan Y (2013b) Decision support analysis for safety control in complex project environments based on Bayesian Networks. Expert Syst Appl 40:4273–4282
Zhang L, Wu X, Chen Q, Skibniewski MJ, Hsu S-C (2014) Towards a safety management approach for adjacent buildings in tunneling environments: case study in China. Build Environ 75:222–235
Zhang L, Wu X, Chen Q, Skibniewski M, Zhong J (2015) Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:513–526
Zhu JY, Deshmukh A (2003) Application of Bayesian decision networks to life cycle engineering in green design and manufacturing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:91–103
Acknowledgments
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51378235), Hubei Provincial Natural Science Fund (Grant No. 2014CFA117), Wuhan City Construction Committee Support Project (Grant No. 201334) and Henan Provincial Natural Science Fund (Grant No. 132102210262) are acknowledged for their financial support of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, X., Jiang, Z., Zhang, L. et al. Dynamic risk analysis for adjacent buildings in tunneling environments: a Bayesian network based approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29, 1447–1461 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1045-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1045-1