Erratum to: Trees DOI 10.1007/s00468-014-1058-2

The RMSE values in Figs. 3–8 were erroneously published. The corrected figures are given below:

Fig. 3
figure 1

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from DHP with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 2

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from DHP after correcting for the woody-to-total area ratio (W), clumping index (C) and needle-to-shoot area ratio (N) (LAIDHP-WCN) according to Eq. (1) with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 3

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from DHP after correcting for the automatic exposure with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 4

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from DHP after correcting for the woody-to-total area ratio (W), clumping index (C) and needle-to-shoot area ratio (N) and automatic exposure (E) (LAIDHP-WCNE) with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 5

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from LAI-2000 with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 6

Relationship between LAI estimated by litter collection (LAIlit) and effective LAI from LAI-2000 after correcting for the woody-to-total area ratio (W), clumping index (C) and needle-to-shoot area ratio (N) (LAI2000-WCN) according to Eq. (1) with different zenith angle ranges. The dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship

Full size image