Erratum to: Pediatr Nephrol

DOI 10.1007/s00467-017-3610-y

In the abstract of this article, the number of C4d-negative patients was incorrectly given as 10 and the number of C4d-positive patients as 37. The third sentence of the Results paragraph of the abstract should correctly have read:“Compared with C4d-negative patients (n = 37), C4d-positive patients (n = 10) presented higher baseline proteinuria (1.66 ± 0.68 vs 0.47 ± 0.19 g/day/1.73 m2, p < 0.001), a progressive decline in eGFR (−10.04 ± 19.38 vs 1.70 ± 18.51 ml/min/1.73 m2/year; p = 0.045), and more frequently achieved the primary outcome (50.0 vs 10.8%, p = 0.013), and ESRD (30.0 vs 2.7%, p = 0.026)”.

This mistake was not repeated elsewhere in the article, and the results are all correct as given.

The authors regret this error and any inconvenience caused.