Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of a bird model in unsteady flight

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a type of numerical simulation of a three-dimensional (3D) bionic bird with flapping wings in a viscous flow is studied. The model is a self-propelled flying bird capable of free rotation and translation whose flying motion follows the laws of conservation of momentum and angular momentum. The bird is propelled and lifted through flapping and rotating wings and most of thrust force and lift force are exerted on both wings. Both the vortex structures and the flight characteristics are also presented. The relationship between both wings’ movement and the vortex structures as well as that between both wings’ movement and flight characteristics are also analyzed in this paper. The study uses a 3D computational fluid dynamics package that includes the combined immersed boundary method, volume of fluid method, adaptive multigrid finite volume method, and control strategy for swimming and flying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xin ZQ, Wu CJ (2013) Shape optimization of the caudal fin of the three-dimensional self-propelled swimming fish. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 56:328–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shyy W, Lian YS, Tang J, Viieru D, Liu H (2008) Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number flyers. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang C-K, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:284–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sane SP, Dickinson MH (2001) The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. J Exp Biol 204:2607–2626

    Google Scholar 

  5. Poelma C, Dickson WB, Dickinson MH (2006) Time-resolved reconstruction of the full velocity field around a dynamically-scaled flapping wing. Exp. Fluids 41:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shyy W, Trizila P, Kang C, Aono H (2009) Can tip vortices enhance lift of a flapping wing? AIAA J 47:289–293

  7. Usherwood JR, Ellington CP (2002) The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings. J Exp Biol 205:1547–1564

    Google Scholar 

  8. Usherwood JR, Ellington CP (2002) The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail. J Exp Biol 205:1565–1576

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taira K, Colonius T (2009) Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 623:187–207

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong H, Mittal R, Najjar FM (2006) Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of low-aspect-ratio flapping foils. J Fluid Mech 566:309–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pennycuick CJ (1996) Wingbeat frequency of birds in steady cruising flight: new data and improved predictions. J Exp Biol 199:1613–1618

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ansari SA, Knowles K, Żbikowski R (2008) Insectlike flapping wings in the hover part 1: effect of wing kinematics. J Aircr 45:1945–1954

  13. Ellington CP, Van Den Berg C, Willmott AP, Thomas ALR (1996) Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384:626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dickinson MH, Lehmann F-O, Sane SP (1999) Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Nature 284:1954–1960

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu H, Ellington CP, Kawachi K, Van Den Berg C, Willmott AP (1998) A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering. J Exp Biol 201:461–477

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun M, Tang J (2002) Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Exp Biol 205:55–70

  17. Sun M, Tang J (2002) Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis. J Exp Biol 205:2413–2427

  18. Wang ZJ, Birch JM, Dickinson MH (2004) Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments. J Exp Biol 207:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu CJ (2013) Preface to the special topic on fluid mechanics. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 56:247–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tezduyar TE (2006) Interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for finite element computation of moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2983–3000

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—The deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351

  23. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—The deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371

  24. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng 21:359–398

  25. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760

  26. Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778

  27. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2014) Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C). Comput Mech 53:91–99

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC). Comput Mech 54:955–971

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Takizawa K (2014) Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space-time methods. Comput Mech 54:193–211

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10:252–271

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Mittal R, Iaccarino G (2005) Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev of Fluid Mech 37:239–261

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Majumdar S, Iaccarino G, and Durbin P (2001) RANS solvers with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Annu Res Briefs 353–366

  33. Iaccarino G, Verzicco R (2003) Immersed boundary technique for turbulent flow simulations. Appl Mech Rev 56:331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Iaccarino G, Kalitzin G, Khalighi B (2003) Towards an immersed boundary RANS flow solver. AIAA Paper 2003-0770

  35. Clarke DK, Salas MD, Hassan HA (1986) Euler calculations for multielement airfoils using Cartesian grids. AIAA J 24:353–358

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Mittal R, Bonilla C, Udaykumar HS (2003) Cartesian grid methods for simulating flows with moving boundaries. In: Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements-XI, pp 557–566

  37. Mittal R, Utturkar Y, Udaykumar HS (2002) Computational modeling and analysis of biomimetic flight mechanisms. AIAA Paper 2002-0865

  38. Mittal R, Seshadri V, Udaykumar HS (2004) Flutter, tumble and vortex induced autorotation. Theoret Comput Fluid Dyn 17:165–170

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Utturkar Y, Mittal R, Rampunggoon P, Cattafesta L (2002) Sensitivity of synthetic jets to the design of the jet cavity. AIAA Paper 2002-0124

  40. Wang L, Wu CJ (2010) An adaptive version of ghost-cell immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex stationary and moving boundaries. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 53:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Popinet S (2003) Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J Comput Phys 190:572–600

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Popinet S (2007) The Gerris Flow Solver. http://www.gfs.sf.net

  43. Wu CJ, Wang L (2009) Numerical simulations of self-propelled swimming of 3D bionic fish school. Sci China Ser E 52:658–669

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P (1988) Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88, pp 193–208

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 11372068 and the National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 Program), No. 2014CB744104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Chui-Jie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin-Lin, Z., Hui, G. & Chui-Jie, W. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of a bird model in unsteady flight. Comput Mech 58, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1233-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1233-3

Keywords

Navigation