Skip to main content
Log in

Viscoplastic regularization of local damage models: revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local damage models are known to produce pathological mesh dependent results. Regularization techniques are therefore mandatory if local damage models are used for academic research or industrial applications. The viscoplastic framework can be used for regularization of local damage models. Despite of the easy implementation of viscoplasticity, this method of regularization did not gain much popularity in comparison to the non-local or gradient damage models. This work is an effort to further explore viscoplastic regularization for quasi-static problems. The focus of this work is on ductile materials. Two different types of strain rate hardening models i.e. the Power law (with a multiplicative strain rate part) and the simplified Bergström van Liempt (with an additive strain rate part) models are used in this study. The modified Lemaitre’s anisotropic damage model with a strain rate dependency was used in this study. It was found that the primary viscoplastic length scale is a function of the hardening and softening (damage) parameters and does not depend upon the prescribed strain rate whereas the secondary length scale is a function of the strain rate. As damage grows, the effective regularization length gradually decreases. When the effective regularization length gets shorter than the element length numerical results become mesh dependent again. This loss of objectivity can not be solved but the effect can be minimized by selecting a very fine mesh or by prescribing high deformation velocities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atzema EH, ten Horn CHLJ, Vegter H (2004) Influence of tooling layout on sheet forming process analysis. In: Neittaanmaki P, Rossi T, Korotov S, Onate E, Periaux J, Knorzer D (eds) Proceeding of European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering. Jyvskyl, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazant ZP, Jirasek M (2002) Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. J Eng Mech 128(11): 1119–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergström Y (1969) A dislocation model for the stress–strain behaviour of polycrystalline α-fe with special emphasis on the variation of the densities of mobile and immobile dislocations. J Mater Sci Eng 5: 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter-Leberre H (2005) Failure analysis of anisotropic sheet metal using a non-local plastic damage model. J Mater Process Technol 170: 457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coenen EWC, Kouznetsova VG, Geers MGD (2012) Novel boundary conditions for strain localization analyses in microstructural volume elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90(1): 1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowie JG, Azrin M, Olson GB (1989) Microvoid formation during shear deformation of ultrahigh strength steels. Metall Trans A 20A: 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Borst R, Sluys LJ, Muhlhaus HB, Pamin J (1993) Fundamental issues in finite element analyses of localisation of deformation. Eng Comput 10(2): 99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dube J-F, Pijaudier-Cabot G, La Borderie C (1996) Rate dependent damage model for concrete in dynamics. ASCE J Eng Mech 122(10): 939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engelen RAB (2005) Plasticity induced damage in metals. Non-local modeling at finite strains. PhD thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

  10. Estrin Y, Mecking H (1984) A unified phenomenological description of work hardening and creep based on one-parameter models. Acta Metall 32(1): 57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fictorie E, van den Boogaard AH, Atzema EH (2010) Influence of punch radius in a nakazima test for mild steel and aluminum. Int J Mater Form 3(1): 1179–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heeres OM, Suiker ASJ, de Borst R (2002) A comparison between the perzyna viscoplastic model and the consistency viscoplastic model. Eur J Mech A/Solids 21: 1–12

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Huh H, Kim SB, Song JH, Lim JH (2008) Dynamic tensile characteristics of trip-type and DP-type steel sheets for an auto-body. Int J Mech Sci 50: 918–931

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jirasek M (1998) Nonlocal models for damage and fracture: comparison of approaches. Int J Solids Struct 35(31–32): 4133–4145

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jirasek M, Rolshoven S (2003) Comparison of integral-type nonlocal plasticity models for strain-softening materials. Int J Eng Sci 41(13-14): 1553–1602

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leon-Garcia O, Petrov R, Kestens L (2007) Deformation and damage evolution of the microstructure around ti particles in if steel during tensile deformation. Key Eng Mater 348–349: 173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McVeigh C, Liu WK (2010) Multiresolution continuum modeling of micro-void assisted dynamic adiabatic shear band propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 58: 187–205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. McVeigh C, Vernereya F, Liu WK, Morana B, Olson G (2007) An interactive micro-void shear localization mechanism in high strength steels. J Mech Phys Solids 55: 225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Needleman A (1988) Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 67: 69–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders T (2012) Viscoplastic regularization of local damage models: a latent solution. Key Eng Mater 504–506: 845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders T, Huétink J (2011) Failure predictions for dp steel cross-die test using anisotropic damage. Int J Damage Mech. doi:10.1177/1056789511407646

  23. Peerlings RHJ, Brekelmans WAM, de Borst R, Geers MGD (1998) Softening, singularity and mesh sensitivity in quasi-brittle and fatigue damage, in nonlocal aspects in solid mechanics. In: Brillard A, Ganghoffer JF (eds) Proceedings of EUROMECH Colloquium 378. Mulhouse, France, pp 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree JHP, Spee I (1996) Some observations on localisation in non-local and gradient damage models. Eur J Mech A/Solids 15: 937–953

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD (2002) Localisation issues in local and nonlocal continuum approaches to fracture. Eur J Mech A Solids 21(2): 175–189

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Pirali P, Liaghat GhH, Ahmadi MT (2010) Viscoplasticity coupled with nonlocalized damage for incompatibilities due to strain softening. Mechanika 6(86): 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sluys LJ, de Borst R (1992) Wave propagation and localization in a rate-dependent cracked medium–model formulation and one-dimensional examples. Int J Solids Struct 29(23): 2945–2958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Steglich D, Siegmund T, Brocks W (1999) Micromechanical modeling of damage due to particle cracking in reinforced metals. Comput Mater Sci 16: 404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tasan CC (2010) Micro-mechanical characterization of ductile damage in sheet metal. PhD thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

  30. Tasan CC, Hoefnagels JPM, ten Horn CHLJ, Geers MGD (2009) Experimental analysis of strain path dependent ductile damage mechanics and forming limits. Mech Mater 41(11): 1264–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tvergaard V, Niordson C (2004) Nonlocal plasticity effects on interaction of different size voids. Int J Plast 20: 107–120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. van Liempt P (1994) Workhardening and substructural geometry of metals. J Mater Process Technol 45: 459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vegter H, ten Horn CHLJ, An Y, Atzema E, Pijlman HH, van den Boogaard TH, Huétink H (2003) Characterization and modelling of the plastic behaviour and its application in sheet metal forming simulation. In: Onate E, Owen DRJ (eds) COMPLAS VII, 7th international conference on computational plasticity. CIMNE, Barcelona

  34. Vysochinskiy D, Coudert T, Reyes A, Lademo OG (2012) Determination of forming limit strains using marciniak-kuczynski tests and automated digital image correlation procedures. Key Eng Mater 504–506: 17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang WM, Sluys LJ (2000) Formulation of an implicit algorithm for finite deformation viscoplasticity. Int J Solids Struct 37: 7329–7348

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang WM, Sluys LJ, de Borst R (1996) Interaction between material length scale and imperfection size for localisation phenomena in viscoplastic media. Eur J Mech A Solids 15: 447–464

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang WM, Sluys LJ, de Borst R (1997) Viscoplasticity for instabilities due to strain softening and strain-rate softening. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40: 3839–3864

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Niazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niazi, M.S., Wisselink, H.H. & Meinders, T. Viscoplastic regularization of local damage models: revisited. Comput Mech 51, 203–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0717-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0717-7

Keywords

Navigation