Abstract
Background
There is ongoing debate about whether or not robot-assisted thyroidectomy is appropriate for modified radical neck dissection (MRND). The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted MRND with those of a conventional open procedure.
Methods
One hundred and forty-five patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, bilateral central neck dissection, and MRND (robotic, n = 28; open, n = 117) at our institution from June 2011 to June 2015 were enrolled in the study. The surgical completeness and complication rates in the robotic and open groups were retrospectively compared after 1:3 propensity score matching for age, sex, body mass index, tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension.
Results
The complication rates, including transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, were comparable between the study groups (p > 0.05). The operating time was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the open group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes, or stimulated serum thyroglobulin level between the two groups (p = 0.733, p = 0.663, and p = 0.285, respectively).
Conclusions
The surgical outcomes, including complication and completeness rates, were comparable between robot-assisted MRND using a bilateral axillary breast approach and conventional open surgery. Robot-assisted MRND can be recommended as an alternative to a conventional open procedure for thyroidectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399–2406
Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK (2009) Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19:e71–e75
Bae DS, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim E, Lee KE, Youn YK (2014) Current status of robotic thyroid surgery in South Korea: a web-based survey. World J Surg 38:2632–2639
Paek SH, Kang KH, Park SJ (2018) Expanding indications of robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 32:3480–3485
Chai YJ, Suh H, Woo JW, Yu HW, Song RY, Kwon H, Lee KE (2017) Surgical safety and oncological completeness of robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma larger than 2 cm. Surg Endosc 31:1235–1240
Kang SW, Lee SH, Ryu HR, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2010) Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surgery 148:1214–1221
Yu HW, Chai YJ, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Lee KE (2018) Robotic-assisted modified radical neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach (robotic BABA MRND) for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral lymph node metastasis. Surg Endosc 32:2322–2327
Choi JY, Kang KH (2017) Robotic modified radical neck dissection with bilateral axillo-breast approach. Gland Surg 6:243–249
Seup Kim B, Kang KH, Park SJ (2015) Robotic modified radical neck dissection by bilateral axillary breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck metastasis. Head Neck 37:37–45
Kang SW, Lee SH, Park JH, Jeong JS, Park S, Lee CR, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2012) A comparative study of the surgical outcomes of robotic and conventional open modified radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surg Endosc 26:3251–3257
Song RY, Sohn HJ, Paek SH, Kang KH (2018) The first report of robotic bilateral modified radical neck dissection through the bilateral axillo-breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with bilateral lateral neck metastasis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000590
Paek SH, Kang KH (2016) Robotic thyroidectomy and cervical neck dissection for thyroid cancer. Gland Surg 5:342–351
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26:1–133
Lee KE, Koo do H, Im HJ, Park SK, Choi JY, Paeng JC, Chung JK, Oh SK, Youn YK (2011) Surgical completeness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy after propensity score matching. Surgery 150:1266–1274
Paek SH, Kang KH, Park SJ (2018) A comparison of robotic versus open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 28:170–173
Kim MJ, Lee J, Lee SG, Choi JB, Kim TH, Ban EJ, Lee CR, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Jo YS, Chung WY (2017) Transaxillary robotic modified radical neck dissection: a 5-year assessment of operative and oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 31:1599–1606
Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424
Son SK, Kim JH, Bae JS, Lee SH (2015) Surgical safety and oncologic effectiveness in robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3022–3032
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Se Hyun Paek, Hye Ah Lee, Hyungju Kwon, Kyung Ho Kang, and Sung Jun Park have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paek, S.H., Lee, H.A., Kwon, H. et al. Comparison of robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection using a bilateral axillary breast approach with a conventional open procedure after propensity score matching. Surg Endosc 34, 622–627 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06808-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06808-9