Abstract
Introduction
Whereas sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in its beginnings was mainly performed to treat super-obesity, it has become as popular as gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity of any class. In contrast to this, the persisting problems of early staple line leaks and poor long-term results of SG regarding weight loss and new onset of gastroesophageal reflux have become increasingly obvious. The mini-gastric bypass (MGB) with its low complication rates and possibly better long-term results may be a good alternative to SG, especially in super-obesity.
Methods
In this context, two groups of mostly super-obese patients (SG and MGB) of a single bariatric center were retrospectively analyzed and compared for perioperative and early postoperative outcomes.
Results
Between August 2007 and March 2015, 169 patients underwent MGB, while 118 patients were operated by SG. Both groups were comparable for BMI at baseline (MGB = 54.1 kg/m2 vs. SG = 54.6 kg/m2, p = 0.657). Mean operation time (81.7 vs. 112.1 min, p < 0.0001) as well as hospital stay was lower in the MGB-group (4.5 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.0001). Perioperative (30 days) mortality was 0 % in MGB versus 0.8 % in SG (one patient). Perioperative complication rate was also lower in the MGB-group (3.0 vs. 9.3 %, p = 0.449). %EWL was significantly better after 1 year in MGB: 66.2 % (±13.9 %) versus 57.3 % (±19.0 %) in SG (p < 0.0001), as well as BMI which was 34.9 kg/m2 (±4.8 kg/m2) in MGB versus 38.5 kg/m2 (±8.6 kg/m2) in SG (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
MGB achieved superior weight loss at 1 year and had a lower 30-day complication rate in comparison with SG for super-obese patients. Thus, MGB might be superior to SG regarding the treatment of super-obesity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832
Stroh C, Weiner R, Horbach T, Ludwig K, Dressler M, Lippert H et al (2013) Kompetenznetz Adipositas, Arbeitsgruppe Adipositaschirurgie. New data on quality assurance in bariatric surgery in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 138:180–188
Franco JV, Ruiz PA, Palermo M, Gagner M (2011) A review of studies comparing three laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 21(9):1458–1468
Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Gagner M (2013) Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg 257(2):231–237
Yang X, Yang G, Wang W, Chen G, Yang H (2013) A meta-analysis: to compare the clinical results between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for the obese patients. Obes Surg 23(7):1001–1010
Peterli R, Borbély Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M et al (2013) Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg 258(5):690–694 (discussion 695)
Braghetto I, Csendes A, Lanzarini E, Papapietro K, Cárcamo C, Molina JC (2012) Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an acceptable primary bariatric procedure in obese patients? Early and 5-year postoperative results. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 22(6):479–486
Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252(2):319–324
Lee WJ, Lin YH (2014) Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg 24(10):1749–1756
Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, Gupta A, Balupuri S, Small PK (2013) “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg 23(11):1890–1898
Victorzon M (2015) Single-anastomosis gastric bypass: better, faster, and safer? Scand J Surg 104(1):48–53
Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Wei PL, Huang MT (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 242(1):20–28
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Tsou JJ, Chen SC, Chen JC (2012) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg 22(12):1827–1834
Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, Ribeiro R, Manno E, Greco F et al (2016) Efficacy of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission: the role of mini gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year of follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg 26(5):933–940
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Rutledge R (2001) The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg 11(3):276–280
Plamper A, Ehresmann F, Kolec S, Kleimann E, Rheinwalt K (2012) Total Oversewing in sleeve-gastrectomy—Is it worth it? [abstract]. Obes Surg 22:1374
Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, Diamantis T, Tsigris C, Psaltopoulou T (2014) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(5):984–991
Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, Rau C, Bruzzi M, Beaupel N et al (2015) One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg 25(6):951–958
Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, De Luca M, Manno E, Di Stefano C et al (2014) The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc 28(1):156–163
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, Daher R, Antoun NA, Nasr M (2012) One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg 22(5):697–703
Peraglie C (2016) Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older. Surg Endosc 30(1):38–43
Rutledge R, Walsh TR (2005) Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg 15(9):1304–1308
Disse E, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, Poncet G, Gouillat C, Robert M (2014) Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study. Obes Surg 24(6):841–846
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R (2014) Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg 24(10):1724–1728
Lee WJ, Pok EH, Almulaifi A, Tsou JJ, Ser KH, Lee YC (2015) Medium-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a matched comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg 25(8):1431–1438
Lee WJ, Chong K, Lin YH, Wei JH, Chen SC (2014) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of incretin effect. Obes Surg 24(9):1552–1562
Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR (2009) Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5(4):469–475
Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, Crosby RD (2013) Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the fourth international consensus summit on sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23(12):2013–2017
Alvarenga ES, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2016) Safety and efficacy of 1020 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed as a primary treatment modality for morbid obesity. A single-center experience from the metabolic and bariatric surgical accreditation quality and improvement program. Surg Endosc 30(7):2673–2678
Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, Griniatsos J, Felekouras E, Tsigris C (2014) Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(1):177–183
Stenard F, Iannelli A (2015) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastroenterol 21(36):10348–10357
Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, Schumacher DL (2013) Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(5):760–764
Pallati PK, Shaligram A, Shostrom VK, Oleynikov D, McBride CL, Goede MR (2014) Improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms after various bariatric procedures: review of the bariatric outcomes longitudinal database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(3):502–507
Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, Chen SC, Chen JC, Su YH (2011) Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(4):486–491
Hansson LE, Nyrén O, Hsing AW, Bergström R, Josefsson S, Chow WH et al (1996) The risk of stomach cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. N Engl J Med 335(4):242–249
Rieu PN, Jansen JB, Biemond I, Offerhaus GJ, Joosten HJ, Lamers CB (1992) Short-term results of gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y or Billroth II anastomosis for peptic ulcer. A prospective comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 39(1):22–26
Rutledge R, Kular KS, Deitel M (2015) Laparoscopic mini-gastric (one-anastomosis) bypass surgery. In: Agrawal S (ed) Obesity, bariatric and metabolic surgery: a practical guide. Springer, Switzerland, pp 415–425 (Chapt 43)
Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, Lucido FS, Fico DI, Docimo L (2016) Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(1):62–69. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.011
Acknowledgments
We kindly thank all the colleagues working in our different departments helping us to gain such promising results for our patients.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. A. Plamper, Dr. P. Lingohr, J. Nadal and Dr. K. Rheinwalt have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Ethical approval
For this retrospective study, ethical formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was collected from all individuals included in this study.
Additional information
Andreas Plamper and Philipp Lingohr have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plamper, A., Lingohr, P., Nadal, J. et al. Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results. Surg Endosc 31, 1156–1162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5085-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5085-5