Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Some laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) patients are postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis. Few reports have reviewed the outcomes or validity of LG in such patients.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of LG for gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with T3 (subserosal invasion) or higher or N1 (metastasis in 1–2 regional lymph nodes), or higher disease (n = 36), with open gastrectomy (OG) for c-stage I gastric cancer patients (n = 62).

Results

D1 plus lymph node dissection was performed in all patients in the LG group. Blood loss was significantly lower in the LG group than in the OG group (P < 0.0010). The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was significantly shorter in the LG group than in the OG group (P = 0.0016). In the LG group, lymph node metastasis occurred in 1 patient, peritoneal dissemination in 2 patients, and liver metastasis in 1 patient. The 5-year survival rate did not significantly differ between the LG and OG groups (90.00 vs. 94.52 %; P = 0.6517).

Conclusions

Given the similarity in long-term outcomes between the LG and OG groups, LG is an appropriate indication for gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, Ponzano C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:S306–S311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Association JGC (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Association JGC (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang C, Hua J, Li J, Zhen J, Wang F, Zhao Q, Shuang J, Du J (2014) Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg 208:391–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang YL, Lin HG, Yang JW, Jiang FQ, Zhang T, Yang HM, Li CL, Cui Y (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:1490–1499

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Asao T, Yanagita Y, Nakamura J, Hosouchi Y, Takenoshita S, Nagamachi Y (1999) Usefulness of a visceral mini-retractor accessible without trocar port during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SR, Kim HO, Son BH, Shin JH, Yoo CH (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for upper and middle gastric cancer in short-term and long-term outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu C, Zhou S, Peng Z, Chen L (2015) Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy? Surg Endosc 29:1537–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin J, Huang C, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Wang J, Lu J (2014) A matched cohort study of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer without serosa invasion. Chin Med J (Engl) 127:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 12:7676–7683

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamura H, Yokota R, Homma S, Kondo Y (2009) Comparison of invasiveness between laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy. World J Surg 33:2389–2395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuhashi N, Osada S, Yamaguchi K, Saito S, Okumura N, Tanaka Y, Nonaka K, Takahashi T, Yoshida K (2013) Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy: a single-center safety and feasibility study. Surg Endosc 27:1973–1979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, Furukawa H, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y, Imamura H, Higashino M, Yamamura Y, Kurita A, Arai K (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357:1810–1820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, Kinoshita T, Furukawa H, Yamaguchi T, Nashimoto A, Fujii M, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y (2011) Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4387–4393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Yukie Saito, Ms. Tomoko Yano, Ms. Tomoko Ubukata, Ms. Yuka Matsui, Ms. Ayaka Ishida, and Ayaka Ishikubo for their excellent assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akiharu Kimura.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Akiharu Kimura, Kyoichi Ogata, Norimichi Kogure, Toru Yanoma, Masaki Suzuki, Yoshitaka Toyomasu, Tetsuro Ohno, Erito Mochiki, and Hiroyuki Kuwano have declared no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimura, A., Ogata, K., Kogure, N. et al. Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis. Surg Endosc 30, 2090–2096 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4462-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4462-9

Keywords

Navigation