Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, there has been a controversy between creating an intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in right hemicolectomy. The purpose is to report our experience in intracorporeal anastomosis following right hemicolectomy in both malignant and benign pathologies.

Study design

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted at Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital (Murcia) between January 2000 and April 2014. The study includes all surgery patients who received a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. The criteria for exclusion were conversion to open surgery during the procedure due to technical difficulties during dissect. Tumours considered T4 were not excluded, nor were stage IV patients or those with a history of previous abdominal surgery.

Results

There were 173 patients (63 females) aged 67 (range 14–91) years, with body mass index of 27 (17–52) kg/m2 and ASA 1:2:3:4 of 12:78:68:15; 41 % had previous abdominal surgery and 70 % had a pre-existing comorbidity. Operating time was 142 (60–270) min. Specimen extraction site incision length was 8.1 (6–11.1) cm. Conversion rate was 9.2 %, and there were 39 complications (22.54 %) and 9 reoperations (5.2 %). Readmission rate was 5.2 %. Length of stay was 5.7 (1–35) days.

Conclusion

The intracorporeal procedure is a safe and feasible alternative for creating an ileocolic anastomosis. It involves a similar rate of complications and may prevent some of the drawbacks presented by extracorporeal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baixauili J, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Fazio VW (2003) Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 46:550–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schinkert RT (1991) Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34(11):1030–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2008) The long term results of randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB et al (2011) A case control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cirugía Española 89:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB et al (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case–control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di ZittiL (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy–systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1177–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scatizzi M, Kroning K, Borrelli A et al (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case–control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2013) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27:1730–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumberg D (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy performed using a completely intracorporeal technique is associated with similar outcomes in obese and thin patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franklin ME, CW, Salzmnn MD, Russek K, Garza U (2012) Comparative study between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomoses in right hemicolectomy. In: SAGES annual meeting

  21. Causey MW, Oguntoye M, Steele SR (2011) Incidence of complications following colectomy with mesenteric closure versus no mesenteric closure: does it really matter? J Surg Res 171:571–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kornmann VNN, Hagendoorn J, van Koeverden S, van Rambshorst B, Smits AB (2013) Totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is a technically and oncologically safe procedure. Acta Chir Belg 113:439–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T et al (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205(3):264–267 discussion 268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Drosdeck J, Harzman A, Suzo A et al (2013) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(12):4574–4580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lauscher JC, Grittner F, Stroux A (2012) Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL)?—a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(7):1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pereira JA, Pera M, Grande L (2013) Incidence of incisional hernia after open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cirugía Española 91(1):44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Claes K, Beckers R, Heindryckx E et al (2014) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan. Hernia 18(6):797–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH et al (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ihedioha U, Mackay G, Leung E et al (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22:689–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S et al (2008) Does the extraction—site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee L, Mappin-Kasirer B, Sender Liberman A et al (2012) High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection. Surg Endosc 26(11):3180–3185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel 1:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nieuwenhuizen J, Halm JA, Jeekel J et al (2007) Natural course of incisional hernia and indications for repair. Scand J Surg 96:293–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

J. Abrisqueta, N. Ibañez, J. Luján, Q, Hernández and P. Parrilla of the article do not have commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interests, patent-licensing arrangements, research support, speaker’s bureau, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Abrisqueta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrisqueta, J., Ibañez, N., Luján, J. et al. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 30, 65–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4162-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4162-5

Keyword

Navigation