Article

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 2452-2458

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

  • In Gyu KwonAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • , In ChoAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • , Ali GunerAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineDepartment of Surgery, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital
  • , Yoon Young ChoiAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • , Hyun Beak ShinAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • , Hyoung-Il KimAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineGastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
  • , Ji Yeong AnAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineGastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
  • , Jae-Ho CheongAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineGastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
  • , Sung Hoon NohAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineGastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
    • , Woo Jin HyungAffiliated withDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of MedicineGastric Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health SystemRobot and MIS Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System Email author 

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

Background

Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203 min, P = 0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time.

Conclusions

Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery Remnant gastric cancer Stomach Completion total gastrectomy