Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 2452–2458

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

Authors

  • In Gyu Kwon
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
  • In Cho
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
  • Ali Guner
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Department of SurgeryTrabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital
  • Yoon Young Choi
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
  • Hyun Beak Shin
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
  • Hyoung-Il Kim
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
  • Ji Yeong An
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
  • Jae-Ho Cheong
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
  • Sung Hoon Noh
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
    • Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine
    • Gastric Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
    • Robot and MIS Center, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health System
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3496-8

Cite this article as:
Kwon, I.G., Cho, I., Guner, A. et al. Surg Endosc (2014) 28: 2452. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3496-8

Abstract

Background

Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203 min, P = 0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time.

Conclusions

Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgeryRemnant gastric cancerStomachCompletion total gastrectomy

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014