Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Irritation of inguinal nerves with laparoscopic hernia repair may cause chronic neuralgia and hypoesthesia. Hypoesthesia in particular is generally not assessed objectively. We objectively investigated hypoesthesia and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) with titanium spiral tacks (STs) compared with tissue adhesive (TA) for mesh fixation.

Methods

Mesh fixation in 80 TAPP procedures was randomized to fixation with ST (n = 40) or TA (n = 40). The outcome parameters included hypoesthesia assessed with von Frey monofilaments, early postoperative and chronic pain with the visual analog scale (VAS), morbidity (surgical-site infection, hematoma/seroma, relapse of hernia, trocar hernia), and recovery time to normal activity.

Results

Median (range) follow-up was 38 (13–56) months. Demographic and baseline parameters were similar in the two groups. Prevalence of hypoesthesia was significantly higher at all postoperative times in the ST group (6 weeks: 32 vs. 6%; 6 months: 38 vs. 14%; 12 months: 34 vs. 13%; 13–56 months: 32 vs. 4%). Mean hypoesthesia scores over all time points were significantly higher in the ST group. The percentages of regions with hypoesthesia (abdominal, inguinal, or genitofemoral) following all procedures were higher in the ST group after 6 weeks (14 vs. 2%), 6 months (15 vs. 5%), and 13–56 months (22 vs. 4%). The intensity of pain decreased significantly in both groups over time.

Conclusions

Postoperative hypoesthesia depends on the method of mesh fixation during TAPP and is significantly reduced with TA compared with stapling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001785

  3. Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Fugger R, Scheyer M (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12:385–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs. Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Butters M, Redecke J, Koninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of shouldice, lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94:562–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C (2010) Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C (2010) Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97:600–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hindmarsh AC, Cheong E, Lewis MP, Rhodes M (2003) Attendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 90:1152–1154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245:222–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 19:724–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrew DR, Gregory RP, Richardson DR (1994) Meralgia paraesthetica following laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 81:715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Broin EO, Horner C, Mealy K, Kerin MJ, Gillen P, O’Brien M, Tanner WA (1995) Meralgia paraesthetica following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An anatomical analysis. Surg Endosc 9:76–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K, Rumstadt B, Hagmuller E (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13:878–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beattie GC, Kumar S, Nixon SJ (2000) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: mesh fixation is unnecessary. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:71–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hollinsky C, Gobl S (1999) Bursting strength evaluation after different types of mesh fixation in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 13:958–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Walder N, Mittermayr R, Ohlinger W, Heinze A, Redl H (2007) Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair. Surg Endosc 21:1781–1785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jourdan IC, Bailey ME (1998) Initial experience with the use of N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate glue for the fixation of polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:291–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Pisanelli MC, Bartoli A, Di Zitti L, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Stefanoni M, Patriti A (2008) Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study. Surg Endosc 22:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Guaglio M, Croce E (2007) Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery 142:40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikkelsen T, Werner MU, Lassen B, Kehlet H (2004) Pain and sensory dysfunction 6 to 12 months after inguinal herniotomy. Anesth Analg 99:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beldi G, Haupt N, Ipaktchi R, Wagner M, Candinas D (2008) Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 22:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gerber S, Hammerli PA, Glattli A (2000) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. Evaluation of complications due to transabdominal approach. Chirurg 71:824–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gillion JF, Fagniez PL (1999) Chronic pain and cutaneous sensory changes after inguinal hernia repair: comparison between open and laparoscopic techniques. Hernia 3:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (2004) Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc 18:518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Brigitte Wanner for meticulous data collection and Dr. Stephan Vorburger for advice with statistical analysis. This study was supported by a grant from Anklin AG, 4102 Binningen, Switzerland.

Disclosures

Authors Lukas Brügger, Martina Boesch, Ramin Ipaktchi, Anita Kurmann, Daniel Candinas, and Guido Beldi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Lukas Brügger, Martina Bloesch, Anita Kurmann, Daniel Candinas & Guido Beldi

  2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Ramin Ipaktchi

Authors
  1. Lukas Brügger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martina Bloesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ramin Ipaktchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anita Kurmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Candinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guido Beldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Brügger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brügger, L., Bloesch, M., Ipaktchi, R. et al. Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks. Surg Endosc 26, 1079–1085 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2003-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2003-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation