Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical resident’s training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is currently great discrepancy in the training requirements between medical societies regarding the recommended threshold number of colonoscopies needed to assess for technical competence. Our goal was to determine the number of colonoscopies performed by surgical residents, rate of cecal intubation, as well as trainee perceptions of colonoscopy training after completion of their training period.

Methods

This study consisted of a 12-item electronic survey completed by 21 surgical residents after their 2-month endoscopy rotation at a tertiary care, urban referral center. This survey assessed numbers of colonoscopies performed, number successful to the cecum, and perceptions of training in colonoscopy. The cecal intubation rate was used as a surrogate marker of technical competence.

Results

Twenty-one surgical residents performed a mean of 80 ± 35 total colonoscopies during the 2-month rotation. The average cecal intubation rate was 47% (range 9–78%). Resident comfort level for independently performing a total colonoscopy was scored a mean 3.6 on scale of 1–5 (5 = most comfortable), and 43% of the surgical residents planned on performing colonoscopy after residency training.

Conclusions

Surgical residents can obtain the recommended threshold for colonoscopy (N = 50) during a standard 2-month rotation. However, no resident was able to achieve technical competence in colonoscopy as defined by a 90% cecal intubation rate. These data suggest that the method of training of general surgery residents in colonoscopy may need reappraisal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 1997 Granting of privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Available at http://www.sages.org/publication/id/11/. Accessed 2 April 2009

  2. Toolbox of Assessment Methods, ACGME. Version 1.1; September 2000. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/assess/Toolbox.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2008

  3. American Association of Family Physicians (2008) Colonoscopy (Position Paper). Available at http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/c/colonoscopypositionpaper.html#Parsys0021. Accessed 2 April 2009

  4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2006) Surgery policy information. Available at http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_440/440_policyArchive.asp. Accessed 2 April 2009

  5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2007) ACGME Program requirements for fellowship education in the subspecialties of internal medicine. Available at http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/144pr707_ims.pdf. Accessed 27 November 2008

  6. Asfaha S, Alqahtani S, Hilsden RJ, MacLean AR, Beck PL (2008) Assessment of endoscopic training of general surgery residents in a North American health region. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1056–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63:S16–S28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spier BJ, Benson ME, Pfau PR, Nelligan, G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA (2009) Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowship: determining competence. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (in press)

  9. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera RT, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118:404

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak MV Jr (1996) Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44:54–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morales MP, Mancini GJ, Miedema BW, Rangnekar NJ, Koivunen DG, Ramshaw BJ, Eubanks WS, Stephenson HE (2008) Integrated flexible endoscopy training during surgical residency. Surg Endosc 22:2013–2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kowalski T, Kanchana T, Pungpapong S (2003) Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training 58:412–414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Bret J. Spier, Emily T. Durkin, Andrew J. Walker, Eugene Foley, Eric A. Gaumnitz, and Patrick R. Pfau have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick R. Pfau.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spier, B.J., Durkin, E.T., Walker, A.J. et al. Surgical resident’s training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions. Surg Endosc 24, 2556–2561 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1002-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1002-5

Keywords

Navigation