Skip to main content
Log in

Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®)

Evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Before surgical simulators can be implemented for assessment of surgical training, their construct validity should be assessed.

Methods

Nine novices (NOV), nine medical students (MS), and nine residents (RES) underwent a laparoscopic skills training on the virtual reality (VR) simulator Lap Mentor®. Assessment of laparoscopic skill was based on parameters measured by the computer system before and after training.

Results

Significant difference existed between RES and NOV at seven of nine tasks before training on the VR simulator. After the training in some tasks significant differences were observed between the experienced group (RES) and the nonexperienced groups (MS and NOV) or between medical groups (RES and MS) and nonmedical group (NOV).

Conclusions

Performance parameters of the Lap-Mentor® can be used to distinguish between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunter JG, Sackier JM, Berci G (1994) Training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Quantifying the learning curve. Surg Endosc 8:28–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macmillan AI, Cuschieri A (1999) Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 177:274–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Madan AK, Frantzides CT (2007) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trainers for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Surg Endosc 21:209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, et al. (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182:137–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al. (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, et al. (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krummel TM (1998) Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann Surg 228:635–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, et al. (2007) Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc 21:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDougall EM, Corica FA, Boker JR, et al. (2006) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 202:779–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16:1746–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodrum DT, Andreatta PB, Yellamanchilli RK, et al. (2006) Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. Am J Surg 191:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, et al. (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25:1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This analysis was performed in cooperation with our Chinese friends Aimin Zhang and Yiyang Dai from the Department of General Surgery, Xiao Shan First People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, P. R. China and the Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang hospital, Hangzhou, P.R. China during their scholarship at the Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Charitè Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siegfried Beller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, A., Hünerbein, M., Dai, Y. et al. Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®). Surg Endosc 22, 1440–1444 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9625-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9625-x

Keywords

Navigation