The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS) is a series of five tasks with an objective scoring system. The purpose of this study was to estimate the interrater and test–retest reliability of the MISTELS metrics and to assess their internal consistency.
To determine interrater reliability, two trained observers scored 10 subjects, either live or on tape. Test–retest reliability was assessed by having 12 subjects perform two tests, the second immediately following the first. Interrater and test–retest reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Internal consistency between tasks was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha.
The interrater and test–retest reliabilities for the total scores were both excellent at 0.998 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.985–1.00] and 0.892 (95% CI, 0.665–0.968), respectively. Cronbach’s alpha for the first assessment of the test–retest was 0.86.
The MISTELS metrics have excellent reliability, which exceeds the threshold level of 0.8 required for high-stakes evaluations. These findings support the use of MISTELS for evaluation in many different settings, including residency training programs.
- American Psychological Association (1985) Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
- Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J 314: 572
- Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–302 CrossRef
- Derossis AM, Antoniuk M, Fried GM (1999) Evaluation of laparoscopic skills: a 2-year follow-up during residency training. Can J Surg 42: 293–296
- Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, Fried GM (1998) The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 12: 1117–1120 CrossRef
- Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175: 482–487 CrossRef
- Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17: 964–967 CrossRef
- Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13: 1077–1082 CrossRef
- Gall M, Borg W, Gall J (1996) Educational research: an introduction. Longman, White Plains, NY
- Hanna GB, Drew T, Clinch P, Hunter B, Cuschieri A (1998) Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg Endosc 12: 997–1000 CrossRef
- Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230 CrossRef
- Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204
- Shrout P, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull 86: 420–428 CrossRef
- Streiner D, Norman G (1996) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, New York
- The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques
Volume 20, Issue 5 , pp 744-747
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Laparoscopic training
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Steinberg–Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, #L9.309, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
- 2. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Pavillon 1420 boul. Mont-Royal, Montreal, Quebec, H2V 4P3, Canada