Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

A single-institution analysis of hospital resource utilization for 884 consecutive cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To analyze hospital resource utilization for laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair including the postoperative period.

Methods

Prospectively collected administrative data for incisional hernia repairs were examined. A total of 884 incisional hernia repairs were examined for trends in type of approach over time. Starting October 2001, detailed records were available, and examined for operating room (OR) time, cost data, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day postoperative hospital encounters.

Results

Of the total, 469 incisional hernias were approached laparoscopically (53%) and 415 open (47%). Laparoscopic repair had shorter LOS (1 ± 0.2 days vs 2 ± 0.6 days), longer OR time (149 ± 4 min vs 89 ± 4 min), higher supply costs ($2,237 ± $71 vs $664 ± $113), slightly lower total hospital cost ($6,396 ± $477 vs $7,197 ± $1,819), and slightly more postoperative hospital encounters (15% vs 13%). Use of laparoscopy increased over time (37% in 2000 vs 68% in 2004).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is becoming increasingly popular, and not at increased cost to the health care system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carbajo MA, Martin del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, de la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin F, Vaquero C, Inglada L (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13: 250–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMaria EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14: 326–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egea DA, Martinez JA, Cuenca GM, Miquel JD, Lorenzo JG, Albasini JL, Jordana MC (2004) Mortality following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: lessons from 90 consecutive cases and bibliographical analysis. Hernia 8: 208–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Birkmeyer JD (2002) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 137: 1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238: 391–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holzman MD, Purut CM, Reintgen K, Eubanks S, Pappas TN (1997) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 11: 32–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 39–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343: 392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17: 1778–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno-Egea A, Torralba JA, Girela E, Corral M, Bento M, Cartagena J, Vicente JP, Aguayo JL, Canteras M (2004) Immediate, early, and late morbidity with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and tolerance to composite mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raftopoulos I, Vanuno D, Khorsand J, Kouraklis G, Lasky P (2003) Comparison of open and laparoscopic prosthetic repair of large ventral hernias. JSLS 7: 227–332

    Google Scholar 

  12. Toy FK, Bailey RW, Carey S, Chappuis CW, Gagner M, Josephs LG, Mangiante EC, Park AE, Pomp A, Smoot RT Jr, Uddo JF Jr, Voeller GR (1998) Prospective, multicenter study of laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc 12: 955–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vrijland WW, Jeekel J, Steyerberg EW, Den Hoed PT, Bonjer HJ (2000) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 87: 348–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright BE, Niskanen BD, Peterson DJ, Ney AL, Odland MD, VanCamp J, Zera RT, Rodriguez JL (2002) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: are there comparative advantages over traditional methods of repair? Am Surg 68: 291–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Earle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earle, D., Seymour, N., Fellinger, E. et al. Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20, 71–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0091-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0091-z

Keywords

Navigation