Skip to main content
Log in

Variations in Healthy Swallowing Mechanics During Various Bolus Conditions Using Computational Analysis of Swallowing Mechanics (CASM)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bolus properties such as volume, consistency, and density have been shown to influence swallowing through the analysis of kinematics and timing in both normal and disordered swallowing. However, inherent intra- and inter-person variability of swallowing cloud interpretation of group data. Computational analysis of swallow mechanics (CASM) is an established methodology that uses coordinate tracking to map structural movements during swallowing and yields statistically powerful analyses at both the group and individual levels. In this study, the CASM method was used to determine how different bolus properties (volume, consistency, and density) altered swallow mechanics in healthy young adults at the group and individual levels. Videofluoroscopic swallow studies of 10 (4 females) healthy young adults were analyzed using CASM. Five bolus types were administered in each study (3 × 5 ml 40% w/v nectar, 3 × 5 ml 22% w/v thin, 3 × 5 ml 40% w/v thin, 3 × 10 ml 22% w/v thin, and 3 × 20 ml 22% w/v thin). Canonical variate analyses demonstrated that bolus condition did not affect swallowing mechanics at the group level, but bolus condition did affect pharyngeal swallow mechanics at the individual level. Functional swallow adaptations (e.g., hyoid movement) to bolus conditions were not uniform across participants, consistent with the nonsignificant group finding. These results suggest that individual swallowing systems of healthy young individuals vary in how they respond to bolus different conditions, highlighting the intrinsic variability of the swallow mechanism and the importance of individually tailored evaluation and treatment of swallowing. Findings warrant further investigation with different bolus conditions and aging and disordered populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steele CM, Miller AJ. Sensory input pathways and mechanisms in swallowing: a review. Dysphagia. 2010;25:323–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller AJ. The neurobiology of swallowing and dysphagia. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14:77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jean A. Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:929–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Logemann JA, Ergun GA, Facchini F. Deglutitive tongue action: volume accommodation and bolus propulsion. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:152–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Brasseur JG, Cook IJ, Lang IM. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G675–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarus CL, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Kahrilas PJ, Pajak T, Lazar R, Halper A. Effects of bolus volume, viscosity, and repeated swallows in nonstroke subjects and stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1066–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim Y, McCullough GH. Maximum hyoid displacement in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2008;23:274–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Shah V, Ha T. Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:1469–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodds WJ, Man KM, Cook IJ, Kahrilas PJ, Stewart ET, Kern MK. Influence of bolus volume on swallow-induced hyoid movement in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1307–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dantas RO, Dodds WJ. Effect of bolus volume and consistency on swallow-induced submental and infrahyoid electromyographic activity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1990;23:37–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stokely SL, Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Effects of barium concentration on oropharyngeal swallow timing measures. Dysphagia. 2014;29:78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink TA, Ross JB. Are we testing a true thin liquid? Dysphagia. 2009;24:285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Physiological variability in the deglutition literature: hyoid and laryngeal kinematics. Dysphagia. 2011;26:67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Temporal variability in the deglutition literature. Dysphagia. 2012;27:162–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lof GL, Robbins J. Test–retest variability in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 1990;4:236–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelso JAS. Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Button C, Davids K, Schollhorn W. Coordination profiling of movement systems. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 133–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearson WG Jr, Taylor BK, Blair J, Martin-Harris B. Computational analysis of swallowing mechanics underlying impaired epiglottic inversion. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1854–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson TZ, Obeidin F, Davidoff AA, Hightower CL, Johnson CZ, Rice SL, Sokolove RL, Taylor BK, Tuck JM, Pearson WG Jr. Coordinate mapping of hyolaryngeal mechanics in swallowing. J Vis Exp. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3791/51476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Use of an anatomical scalar to control for sex-based size differences in measures of hyoid excursion during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57:768–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Natarajan R, Stavness I, Pearson W. Semi-automatic tracking of hyolaryngeal coordinates in videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2017;5:379–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson WG, Zumwalt AC. Visualising hyolaryngeal mechanics in swallowing using dynamic MRI. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2014;2:208–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:353–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med. 2003;33:245–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCullough GH, Wertz RT, Rosenbek JC, Mills RH, Ross KB, Ashford JR. Inter- and intrajudge reliability of a clinical examination of swallowing in adults. Dysphagia. 2000;15:58–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JW, Randall DR, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Subjective assessment of videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156:901–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brates D, Molfenter SM, Thibeault SL. Assessing hyolaryngeal excursion: comparing quantitative methods to palpation at the bedside and visualization during videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9927-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mehak Noorani and Erica Herzberg for assistance with data analysis and Dr. Catriona Steele for permission to use the dataset described in this manuscript which was collected during Dr. Sonja Molfenter’s PhD Studies at the University of Toronto under Dr. Steele’s mentorship.

Funding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under award number 1R21DC015067-01 (Molfenter PI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Molfenter.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1635 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lenell, C., Brates, D., Pearson, W.G. et al. Variations in Healthy Swallowing Mechanics During Various Bolus Conditions Using Computational Analysis of Swallowing Mechanics (CASM). Dysphagia 35, 272–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10026-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10026-9

Keywords

Navigation